Stunning-Leash
0xc49ec39e261a5e98178e4ac1e14fb69866f38284
Wallet digest
Activity score
50/100
Performance: thin sample
Open positions
8
Open notional
$0.00
Total PnL
$-3.7K
Realised
$0.00
Win rate
n/a
too few closed
Largest open positions
- UP
Google (GOOGL) Up or Down on March 5?
5830 shares @ 46.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Mar 5, 2026$0.00
$-2.7K
- DOWN
Amazon (AMZN) Up or Down on December 19?
1580 shares @ 59.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Dec 19, 2025$0.00
$-932.20
- DOWN
NYA (NYA) Up or Down on November 11?
110 shares @ 80.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Nov 11, 2025$0.00
$-88.00
- NRG ESPORTS
LoL: NRG Esports vs Citadel Gaming (BO3) - North American Challengers League Regular Season
14 shares @ 83.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Apr 30, 2026$0.00
$-11.62
- GROUND ZERO GAMING
LoL: Ground Zero Gaming vs CTBC Flying Oyster (BO3) - Esports World Cup Asia-Pacific Qualifier Playoffs
12 shares @ 43.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp May 6, 2026$0.00
$-5.16
- UP
XRP Up or Down on April 12?
12 shares @ 73.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Apr 12, 2026$0.00
$-8.76
- DOWN
Hyperliquid Up or Down - April 13, 8:00PM-12:00AM ET
11 shares @ 40.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Apr 14, 2026$0.00
$-4.59
- TEAM NS
Dota 2: Team NS vs Stray Team (BO3) - BetBoom Streamers Battle Group A
10 shares @ 55.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp May 18, 2026$0.00
$-5.50
Recent activity
- TRADEBUYDota 2: Team NS vs Stray Team (BO3) - BetBoom Streamers Battle Group A$5.50May 18, 14:11 UTC
- TRADEBUYLoL: Ground Zero Gaming vs CTBC Flying Oyster (BO3) - Esports World Cup Asia-Pacific Qualifier Playoffs$5.25May 6, 00:21 UTC
- REDEEMLoL: Weibo Gaming vs Anyone's Legend - Game 1 Winner$12.00Apr 29, 01:28 UTC
- TRADEBUYLoL: NRG Esports vs Citadel Gaming (BO3) - North American Challengers League Regular Season$11.62Apr 29, 01:28 UTC
- TRADEBUYLoL: Weibo Gaming vs Anyone's Legend - Game 1 Winner$7.20Apr 25, 04:20 UTC
- TRADEBUYHyperliquid Up or Down - April 13, 8:00PM-12:00AM ET$4.80Apr 14, 01:15 UTC
- TRADEBUYXRP Up or Down on April 12?$8.76Apr 11, 21:17 UTC
- REDEEMEthereum Up or Down - March 29, 9:00PM-9:15PM ET$5.05Mar 30, 01:18 UTC
- TRADEBUYEthereum Up or Down - March 29, 9:00PM-9:15PM ET$5.00Mar 30, 01:14 UTC
- REDEEMSolana Up or Down - March 28, 7:15AM-7:30AM ET$13.51Mar 28, 11:32 UTC
- TRADEBUYSolana Up or Down - March 28, 7:15AM-7:30AM ET$7.00Mar 28, 11:18 UTC
- REDEEMBitcoin Up or Down - March 18, 11:15PM-11:30PM ET$9.65Mar 19, 03:32 UTC
- TRADEBUYBitcoin Up or Down - March 18, 11:15PM-11:30PM ET$5.00Mar 19, 03:15 UTC
- TRADEBUYGoogle (GOOGL) Up or Down on March 5?$2.7KMar 5, 07:08 UTC
- TRADEBUYAmazon (AMZN) Up or Down on December 19?$932.20Dec 19, 01:31 UTC
- REDEEMAmazon (AMZN) Up or Down on December 4?$820.00Dec 5, 01:29 UTC
- TRADEBUYAmazon (AMZN) Up or Down on December 4?$401.80Dec 4, 13:15 UTC
- TRADEBUYNYA (NYA) Up or Down on November 11?$88.00Nov 11, 14:20 UTC
- REDEEMApple (AAPL) Up or Down on November 10?$80.00Nov 11, 09:46 UTC
- TRADEBUYApple (AAPL) Up or Down on November 10?$57.60Nov 10, 14:07 UTC
Persistent ledger timeline
persistentNo trades for this wallet in Orrery's persistent ledger yet. The whale-ingest cron writes ≥ $5k trades every 10 minutes; check back after a recovery window.
Ledger intelligence
persistent7d volume
$0.00
0 trades
30d volume
$0.00
0 trades
Buy share
50%
Sample
low
0 ledger trades
No persistent whale trades for this wallet yet. The live Data API score above can still be useful, but the durable ledger sample is empty.
Profile dimensions
Trade count + how recently they were active. Low = dormant.
How trustworthy the win-rate number is, based on sample size of closed markets.
Share of trades concentrated in their top category.
Share of positions taken while the market was still uncertain (30–70¢) rather than after direction was obvious.
How risky to blindly copy. Higher = riskier — large size, single-position exposure, or thin win-rate sample.
- Trades (all time)
- 35
- Avg trade size
- $383.47
- Top category
- —
- Category concentration
- 0%
- First seen
- Oct 28, 05:42 UTC
- Last active
- May 18, 14:11 UTC
- Win rate sample
- 0 closed
The single Activity score is kept for the leaderboard sort. The five dimensions above are the canonical read — copy-risk bar is inverted so green is always "better for the user".