Tender-Pocket
0xc65a759ee5a88a7f37d537a033f9103a71c42e83
Wallet digest
Activity score
67/100
Performance: thin sample
Open positions
124
Open notional
$49.70
Total PnL
$-3.4K
Realised
$-1.22
Win rate
n/a
too few closed
Largest open positions
showing 10 of 124- YES
Damac Saudi Club vs. Al Fayha Saudi Club: Draw at halftime?
67 shares @ 45.0¢·now 42.5¢·exp May 15, 2026$28.33
$-1.67
- UNDER
Damac Saudi Club vs. Al Fayha Saudi Club: O/U 1.5
81 shares @ 31.0¢·now 26.5¢·exp May 15, 2026$21.37
$-3.63
- UNDER
Sport Lisboa e Benfica vs. FC Alverca: O/U 2.5
404 shares @ 33.3¢·now 0.0¢·exp Feb 8, 2026$0.00
$-134.60
- UNDER
Ulsan HD FC vs. Jeju SK FC: O/U 2.5
283 shares @ 53.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp May 13, 2026$0.00
$-150.00
- UNDER
Sporting CP vs. Sport Lisboa e Benfica: O/U 1.5
234 shares @ 24.3¢·now 0.0¢·exp Apr 19, 2026$0.00
$-56.68
- UNDER
Al Hilal Saudi Club vs. Al Ettifaq Saudi Club: O/U 1.5
230 shares @ 10.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Feb 13, 2026$0.00
$-23.00
- UNDER
Al Hazem SC vs. Al Okhdood SC: O/U 2.5
181 shares @ 14.9¢·now 0.0¢·exp Feb 12, 2026$0.00
$-27.00
- UNDER
West Ham United FC vs. Manchester United FC: O/U 1.5
180 shares @ 15.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Feb 10, 2026$0.00
$-27.00
- UNDER
Paris Saint-Germain FC vs. Olympique de Marseille: O/U 1.5
180 shares @ 15.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Feb 8, 2026$0.00
$-27.00
- UNDER
Málaga CF vs. Cultural y Deportiva Leonesa: O/U 2.5
160 shares @ 50.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Feb 8, 2026$0.00
$-80.00
Recent activity
- TRADEBUYDamac Saudi Club vs. Al Fayha Saudi Club: Draw at halftime?$30.49May 15, 12:32 UTC
- TRADEBUYDamac Saudi Club vs. Al Fayha Saudi Club: O/U 1.5$25.52May 15, 12:31 UTC
- TRADESELLValencia CF vs. Rayo Vallecano de Madrid: O/U 2.5$151.62May 14, 21:48 UTC
- TRADESELLReal Madrid CF vs. Real Oviedo: O/U 2.5$146.90May 14, 21:48 UTC
- TRADESELLAl Qadisiyah Saudi Club vs. Al Hazem SC: O/U 3.5$82.14May 14, 21:47 UTC
- REDEEMAl Fateh Saudi Club vs. Al Najmah Saudi Club: O/U 3.5$176.47May 14, 21:05 UTC
- TRADEBUYReal Madrid CF vs. Real Oviedo: O/U 2.5$50.99May 14, 19:06 UTC
- TRADEBUYAl Qadisiyah Saudi Club vs. Al Hazem SC: O/U 3.5$37.61May 14, 12:03 UTC
- TRADESELLAl Qadisiyah Saudi Club vs. Al Hazem SC: O/U 2.5$37.59May 14, 12:03 UTC
- TRADEBUYAl Ettifaq Saudi Club vs. Al Ittihad Saudi Club: O/U 2.5$50.91May 14, 11:12 UTC
- TRADEBUYAl Qadisiyah Saudi Club vs. Al Hazem SC: O/U 2.5$40.89May 14, 11:10 UTC
- TRADEBUYValencia CF vs. Rayo Vallecano de Madrid: O/U 2.5$86.12May 14, 08:51 UTC
- TRADEBUYAl Fateh Saudi Club vs. Al Najmah Saudi Club: O/U 3.5$91.32May 14, 08:50 UTC
- REDEEMCA River Plate vs. Gimnasia y Esgrima de La Plata: O/U 2.5$169.49May 14, 06:00 UTC
- TRADEBUYCA River Plate vs. Gimnasia y Esgrima de La Plata: O/U 1.5$45.91May 13, 23:19 UTC
- TRADEBUYCA River Plate vs. Gimnasia y Esgrima de La Plata: O/U 2.5$101.23May 13, 23:16 UTC
- REDEEMRCD Espanyol de Barcelona vs. Athletic Club: O/U 2.5$219.30May 13, 22:28 UTC
- REDEEMStade Brestois 29 vs. RC Strasbourg Alsace: O/U 3.5$227.94May 13, 22:23 UTC
- TRADEBUYCA Rosario Central vs. Racing Club: O/U 1.5$49.97May 13, 21:47 UTC
- TRADEBUYRCD Espanyol de Barcelona vs. Athletic Club: O/U 2.5$126.61May 13, 12:35 UTC
Persistent ledger timeline
persistentNo trades for this wallet in Orrery's persistent ledger yet. The whale-ingest cron writes ≥ $5k trades every 10 minutes; check back after a recovery window.
Profile dimensions
Trade count + how recently they were active. Low = dormant.
How trustworthy the win-rate number is, based on sample size of closed markets.
Share of trades concentrated in their top category.
Share of positions taken while the market was still uncertain (30–70¢) rather than after direction was obvious.
How risky to blindly copy. Higher = riskier — large size, single-position exposure, or thin win-rate sample.
- Trades (all time)
- 43
- Avg trade size
- $53.60
- Top category
- —
- Category concentration
- 0%
- First seen
- Apr 19, 16:45 UTC
- Last active
- May 15, 12:32 UTC
- Win rate sample
- 1 closed
The single Activity score is kept for the leaderboard sort. The five dimensions above are the canonical read — copy-risk bar is inverted so green is always "better for the user".