Honest-Compliance
0xc6b26661a196e7a1d9a8b4b4a0cd2ab6c6042a56
Wallet digest
Activity score
35/100
Performance: thin sample
Open positions
1
Open notional
$0.00
Total PnL
$-75.00
Realised
$0.00
Win rate
n/a
too few closed
Recent activity
- REDEEMWorld Cup: Saturday - France vs. England$0.00Dec 11, 22:15 UTC
- REDEEMWorld Cup: Saturday - Portugal vs. Morocco$76.86Dec 10, 19:54 UTC
- REDEEMWorld Cup: Saturday - Will Argentina beat Australia?$0.00Dec 6, 19:53 UTC
- REDEEMWorld Cup: Wednesday - Will Mexico beat Saudi Arabia?$0.00Dec 2, 18:48 UTC
- REDEEMWill $ETH fall below $1,000 by July 31?$0.00Nov 27, 17:49 UTC
- REDEEMWill the Fed increase interest rates by 75 bps after its November meeting?$71.40Nov 10, 23:26 UTC
- REDEEMWill Bitcoin or Ethereum perform better in July 2022?$0.00Nov 7, 12:30 UTC
- REDEEMWill the Fed set interest rates above 2.25% (75 bps or more) after their scheduled July meeting?$265.07Jul 29, 10:14 UTC
Persistent ledger timeline
persistentNo trades for this wallet in Orrery's persistent ledger yet. The whale-ingest cron writes ≥ $5k trades every 10 minutes; check back after a recovery window.
Ledger intelligence
persistent7d volume
$0.00
0 trades
30d volume
$0.00
0 trades
Buy share
50%
Sample
low
0 ledger trades
No persistent whale trades for this wallet yet. The live Data API score above can still be useful, but the durable ledger sample is empty.
Profile dimensions
Trade count + how recently they were active. Low = dormant.
How trustworthy the win-rate number is, based on sample size of closed markets.
Share of trades concentrated in their top category.
Share of positions taken while the market was still uncertain (30–70¢) rather than after direction was obvious.
How risky to blindly copy. Higher = riskier — large size, single-position exposure, or thin win-rate sample.
- Trades (all time)
- 0
- Avg trade size
- $0.00
- Top category
- —
- Category concentration
- 0%
- First seen
- Jul 29, 10:14 UTC
- Last active
- Dec 11, 22:15 UTC
- Win rate sample
- 0 closed
The single Activity score is kept for the leaderboard sort. The five dimensions above are the canonical read — copy-risk bar is inverted so green is always "better for the user".