Muddy-Endpoint
0xc8ea1169d55f8ba91bdf258a1d999a728af62557
Activity score
72/100
Performance: thin sample
Open positions
1
Open notional
$5.00
Total PnL
$0.00
Realised
$0.00
Win rate
n/a
too few closed
Largest open positions
Recent activity
- TRADEBUYMap 3: Odd/Even Total Kills?$5.003h ago
- REDEEMExact Score: FK Oleksandriya 1 - 2 FK Zorya Luhansk?$5.003h ago
- TRADEBUYExact Score: FK Oleksandriya 1 - 2 FK Zorya Luhansk?$5.006h ago
- REDEEMTotal Kills Over/Under 51.5 in Game 1?$5.0023h ago
- TRADEBUYTotal Kills Over/Under 51.5 in Game 1?$5.001d ago
- REDEEMExact Score: FC Košice 1 - 2 KFC Komárno?$5.002d ago
- REDEEMYann Gboho: Anytime Goalscorer$5.002d ago
- TRADEBUYExact Score: FC Košice 1 - 2 KFC Komárno?$4.992d ago
- REDEEMTotal Kills Over/Under 30.5 in Game 3?$5.002d ago
- TRADEBUYYann Gboho: Anytime Goalscorer$5.002d ago
- TRADEBUYTotal Kills Over/Under 30.5 in Game 3?$5.002d ago
- REDEEMTotal Kills Over/Under 35.5 in Game 2?$5.003d ago
- TRADEBUYTotal Kills Over/Under 35.5 in Game 2?$5.003d ago
- REDEEMExact Score: AC Nagano Parceiro 0 - 2 FC Gifu?$5.003d ago
- REDEEMSpread: Al Qadisiyah Saudi Club (-2.5)$5.003d ago
- REDEEMSpread: Bengaluru FC (-2.5)$5.003d ago
- TRADEBUYExact Score: AC Nagano Parceiro 0 - 2 FC Gifu?$4.953d ago
- TRADEBUYSpread: Al Qadisiyah Saudi Club (-2.5)$5.003d ago
- REDEEMSpread: FC Goa (-2.5)$0.583d ago
- REDEEMFirst Blood in Game 2?$5.003d ago
Profile dimensions
Trade count + how recently they were active. Low = dormant.
How trustworthy the win-rate number is, based on sample size of closed markets.
Share of trades concentrated in their top category.
Share of positions taken while the market was still uncertain (30–70¢) rather than after direction was obvious.
How risky to blindly copy. Higher = riskier — large size, single-position exposure, or thin win-rate sample.
- Trades (all time)
- 24
- Avg trade size
- $4.43
- Top category
- —
- Category concentration
- 0%
- First seen
- 27d ago
- Last active
- 3h ago
- Win rate sample
- 0 closed
The single Activity score is kept for the leaderboard sort. The five dimensions above are the canonical read — copy-risk bar is inverted so green is always "better for the user".
