Spirited-Invasion
0xc9b62c9bea228442dd68f5a8e6c5032562eb6232
Wallet digest
Activity score
50/100
Performance: thin sample
Open positions
21
Open notional
$0.00
Total PnL
$-4.3K
Realised
$0.00
Win rate
n/a
too few closed
Largest open positions
showing 10 of 21- YES
Fed decreases interest rates by 50+ bps after June 2025 meeting?
40028 shares @ 0.5¢·now 0.0¢·exp Jun 18, 2025$0.00
$-200.14
- YES
Fed decreases interest rates by 50+ bps after July 2025 meeting?
32667 shares @ 0.3¢·now 0.0¢·exp Jul 30, 2025$0.00
$-98.00
- YES
Will Microstrategy announce a Bitcoin purchase December 16-22?
1464 shares @ 6.8¢·now 0.0¢·exp Dec 23, 2025$0.00
$-100.00
- YES
Sunderland AFC vs. Manchester City FC: Both Teams to Score
1000 shares @ 45.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Jan 1, 2026$0.00
$-450.00
- YES
Will West Ham United FC win on 2026-01-06?
910 shares @ 32.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Jan 6, 2026$0.00
$-291.20
- YES
US Sassuolo Calcio vs. Juventus FC: Both Teams to Score
600 shares @ 50.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Jan 6, 2026$0.00
$-300.00
- MANCHESTER CITY FC
Spread: Manchester City FC (-1.5)
600 shares @ 37.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Jan 4, 2026$0.00
$-222.00
- YES
Will Algeria win on 2026-01-06?
600 shares @ 47.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Jan 6, 2026$0.00
$-281.99
- OVER
Tottenham Hotspur FC vs. Sunderland AFC: O/U 2.5
505 shares @ 38.6¢·now 0.0¢·exp Jan 4, 2026$0.00
$-195.20
- YES
Newcastle United FC vs. Crystal Palace FC: Both Teams to Score
502 shares @ 50.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Jan 4, 2026$0.00
$-251.02
Recent activity
- TRADEBUYWill West Ham United FC win on 2026-01-06?$291.20Jan 6, 18:01 UTC
- TRADEBUYUS Sassuolo Calcio vs. Juventus FC: Both Teams to Score$293.00Jan 6, 15:28 UTC
- TRADEBUYUS Sassuolo Calcio vs. Juventus FC: Both Teams to Score$5.00Jan 6, 12:07 UTC
- TRADEBUYUS Sassuolo Calcio vs. Juventus FC: Both Teams to Score$2.00Jan 6, 11:12 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Algeria win on 2026-01-06?$34.58Jan 6, 10:35 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Algeria win on 2026-01-06?$4.13Jan 6, 10:35 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Algeria win on 2026-01-06?$8.11Jan 6, 10:35 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Algeria win on 2026-01-06?$235.18Jan 6, 10:35 UTC
- TRADEBUYMacarthur FC vs. Auckland FC: O/U 2.5$23.00Jan 5, 09:47 UTC
- TRADEBUYMacarthur FC vs. Auckland FC: O/U 2.5$1.60Jan 5, 09:47 UTC
- TRADEBUYMacarthur FC vs. Auckland FC: O/U 2.5$0.68Jan 5, 09:46 UTC
- TRADEBUYMacarthur FC vs. Auckland FC: O/U 2.5$57.10Jan 5, 09:46 UTC
- TRADEBUYMacarthur FC vs. Auckland FC: O/U 2.5$6.73Jan 5, 09:46 UTC
- TRADEBUYMacarthur FC vs. Auckland FC: O/U 2.5$0.47Jan 5, 09:46 UTC
- TRADEBUYMacarthur FC vs. Auckland FC: O/U 2.5$3.20Jan 5, 09:46 UTC
- TRADEBUYMacarthur FC vs. Auckland FC: O/U 2.5$3.20Jan 5, 09:46 UTC
- REDEEMFulham FC vs. Liverpool FC: O/U 2.5$599.99Jan 5, 09:45 UTC
- TRADEBUYSpread: Manchester City FC (-1.5)$222.00Jan 4, 18:10 UTC
- TRADEBUYMorocco vs. Tanzania: O/U 1.5$114.00Jan 4, 17:20 UTC
- REDEEMLeeds United FC vs. Manchester United FC: Both Teams to Score$600.00Jan 4, 17:18 UTC
Persistent ledger timeline
persistentNo trades for this wallet in Orrery's persistent ledger yet. The whale-ingest cron writes ≥ $5k trades every 10 minutes; check back after a recovery window.
Ledger intelligence
persistent7d volume
$0.00
0 trades
30d volume
$0.00
0 trades
Buy share
50%
Sample
low
0 ledger trades
No persistent whale trades for this wallet yet. The live Data API score above can still be useful, but the durable ledger sample is empty.
Profile dimensions
Trade count + how recently they were active. Low = dormant.
How trustworthy the win-rate number is, based on sample size of closed markets.
Share of trades concentrated in their top category.
Share of positions taken while the market was still uncertain (30–70¢) rather than after direction was obvious.
How risky to blindly copy. Higher = riskier — large size, single-position exposure, or thin win-rate sample.
- Trades (all time)
- 44
- Avg trade size
- $96.44
- Top category
- —
- Category concentration
- 0%
- First seen
- Jan 2, 18:31 UTC
- Last active
- Jan 6, 18:01 UTC
- Win rate sample
- 0 closed
The single Activity score is kept for the leaderboard sort. The five dimensions above are the canonical read — copy-risk bar is inverted so green is always "better for the user".