Webbed-Crocodile
0xc9cd0a034ff47c621a9fea395d6696b81dbb432c
Wallet digest
Activity score
30/100
Performance measurable
Open positions
69
Open notional
$0.00
Total PnL
$-28.0K
Realised
$-2.2K
Win rate
0%
8 closed
Largest open positions
showing 10 of 69- KNICKS
Mavericks vs. Knicks
7450 shares @ 22.5¢·now 0.0¢·exp Jan 19, 2026$0.00
$-1.7K
- CLIPPERS
Clippers vs. Bulls
2500 shares @ 42.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Jan 21, 2026$0.00
$-1.1K
- RAPTORS
Raptors vs. Lakers
2500 shares @ 45.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Jan 19, 2026$0.00
$-1.1K
- MAGIC
Magic vs. Grizzlies
2500 shares @ 40.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Jan 18, 2026$0.00
$-999.99
- SINNER
Qatar Open: Jakub Mensik vs Jannik Sinner
2480 shares @ 65.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Feb 26, 2026$0.00
$-1.6K
- RADUCANU
Australian Open Women's: Anastasia Potapova vs Emma Raducanu
2050 shares @ 29.8¢·now 0.0¢·exp Feb 4, 2026$0.00
$-611.50
- HURKACZ
Australian Open Men's: Hubert Hurkacz vs Ethan Quinn
2000 shares @ 53.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Feb 5, 2026$0.00
$-1.1K
- BAEZ
Australian Open Men's: Sebastian Baez vs Luciano Darderi
2000 shares @ 56.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Feb 4, 2026$0.00
$-1.1K
- TEMPLE OWLS
Florida Atlantic Owls vs. Temple Owls
2000 shares @ 40.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Jan 18, 2026$0.00
$-800.00
- 76ERS
Suns vs. 76ers
2000 shares @ 43.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Jan 21, 2026$0.00
$-860.00
Recent activity
- TRADEBUYRio Open: Joao Fonseca vs Ignacio Buse$2.37Feb 19, 22:22 UTC
- TRADEBUYQatar Open: Jakub Mensik vs Jannik Sinner$32.50Feb 19, 20:27 UTC
- TRADEBUYQatar Open: Jakub Mensik vs Jannik Sinner$19.50Feb 19, 20:27 UTC
- TRADEBUYQatar Open: Jakub Mensik vs Jannik Sinner$89.70Feb 19, 20:27 UTC
- TRADEBUYQatar Open: Jakub Mensik vs Jannik Sinner$6.50Feb 19, 20:27 UTC
- TRADEBUYQatar Open: Jakub Mensik vs Jannik Sinner$1.3KFeb 19, 20:27 UTC
- TRADEBUYQatar Open: Jakub Mensik vs Jannik Sinner$8.63Feb 19, 20:27 UTC
- TRADEBUYQatar Open: Jakub Mensik vs Jannik Sinner$157.37Feb 19, 20:27 UTC
- TRADESELLQatar Open: Carlos Alcaraz vs Karen Khachanov$999.00Feb 19, 20:26 UTC
- TRADEBUYQatar Open: Carlos Alcaraz vs Karen Khachanov$600.00Feb 19, 18:04 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Real Madrid win the 2025–26 La Liga?$5.00Feb 16, 21:45 UTC
- REDEEMRotterdam Open: Alex de Minaur vs Botic van de Zandschulp$1.2KFeb 15, 19:49 UTC
- TRADEBUYRotterdam Open: Alex de Minaur vs Botic van de Zandschulp$33.34Feb 13, 15:57 UTC
- TRADEBUYRotterdam Open: Alex de Minaur vs Botic van de Zandschulp$55.80Feb 13, 15:57 UTC
- TRADEBUYRotterdam Open: Alex de Minaur vs Botic van de Zandschulp$12.60Feb 13, 15:57 UTC
- TRADEBUYRotterdam Open: Alex de Minaur vs Botic van de Zandschulp$57.60Feb 13, 15:57 UTC
- TRADEBUYRotterdam Open: Alex de Minaur vs Botic van de Zandschulp$27.00Feb 13, 15:57 UTC
- TRADEBUYRotterdam Open: Alex de Minaur vs Botic van de Zandschulp$90.00Feb 13, 15:57 UTC
- TRADEBUYRotterdam Open: Alex de Minaur vs Botic van de Zandschulp$59.40Feb 13, 15:57 UTC
- TRADEBUYRotterdam Open: Alex de Minaur vs Botic van de Zandschulp$27.00Feb 13, 15:57 UTC
Persistent ledger timeline
persistentNo trades for this wallet in Orrery's persistent ledger yet. The whale-ingest cron writes ≥ $5k trades every 10 minutes; check back after a recovery window.
Ledger intelligence
persistent7d volume
$0.00
0 trades
30d volume
$0.00
0 trades
Buy share
50%
Sample
low
0 ledger trades
No persistent whale trades for this wallet yet. The live Data API score above can still be useful, but the durable ledger sample is empty.
Profile dimensions
Trade count + how recently they were active. Low = dormant.
How trustworthy the win-rate number is, based on sample size of closed markets.
Share of trades concentrated in their top category.
Share of positions taken while the market was still uncertain (30–70¢) rather than after direction was obvious.
How risky to blindly copy. Higher = riskier — large size, single-position exposure, or thin win-rate sample.
- Trades (all time)
- 46
- Avg trade size
- $117.53
- Top category
- —
- Category concentration
- 0%
- First seen
- Feb 5, 14:19 UTC
- Last active
- Feb 19, 22:22 UTC
- Win rate sample
- 8 closed
The single Activity score is kept for the leaderboard sort. The five dimensions above are the canonical read — copy-risk bar is inverted so green is always "better for the user".