Pesky-Grape
0xca4ed85a85d089863c91f0e8fddb618029652e5c
Wallet digest
Activity score
42/100
Performance: thin sample
Open positions
1
Open notional
$0.00
Total PnL
$-550.00
Realised
$0.00
Win rate
n/a
too few closed
Recent activity
- REDEEMWill the 10-year Treasury yield hit 5.7% in 2025?$1.00Apr 28, 08:49 UTC
- REDEEMWill Palantir (PLTR) close at $196-$198 on the final day of trading of the week of Nov 17 – Nov 21?$1.41Nov 22, 03:09 UTC
- TRADEBUYRocket Lab (RKLB) Up or Down on November 21?$550.00Nov 21, 07:11 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Palantir (PLTR) close at $196-$198 on the final day of trading of the week of Nov 17 – Nov 21?$1.40Nov 15, 08:30 UTC
- TRADESELLWill the 10-year Treasury yield hit 5.7% in 2025?$3.5KNov 15, 08:26 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill the 10-year Treasury yield hit 5.7% in 2025?$3.5KNov 15, 08:09 UTC
Persistent ledger timeline
persistentNo trades for this wallet in Orrery's persistent ledger yet. The whale-ingest cron writes ≥ $5k trades every 10 minutes; check back after a recovery window.
Ledger intelligence
persistent7d volume
$0.00
0 trades
30d volume
$0.00
0 trades
Buy share
50%
Sample
low
0 ledger trades
No persistent whale trades for this wallet yet. The live Data API score above can still be useful, but the durable ledger sample is empty.
Profile dimensions
Trade count + how recently they were active. Low = dormant.
How trustworthy the win-rate number is, based on sample size of closed markets.
Share of trades concentrated in their top category.
Share of positions taken while the market was still uncertain (30–70¢) rather than after direction was obvious.
How risky to blindly copy. Higher = riskier — large size, single-position exposure, or thin win-rate sample.
- Trades (all time)
- 4
- Avg trade size
- $1.9K
- Top category
- —
- Category concentration
- 0%
- First seen
- Nov 15, 08:09 UTC
- Last active
- Apr 28, 08:49 UTC
- Win rate sample
- 0 closed
The single Activity score is kept for the leaderboard sort. The five dimensions above are the canonical read — copy-risk bar is inverted so green is always "better for the user".