Appropriate-Figure
0xcc9d18e76b0b4501546f2412795484d86359e0ed
Wallet digest
Activity score
50/100
Performance: thin sample
Open positions
9
Open notional
$0.00
Total PnL
$-276.30
Realised
$0.00
Win rate
n/a
too few closed
Largest open positions
- OVER
FC Barcelona vs. Newcastle United FC: O/U 10.5 Total Corners
99 shares @ 60.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Mar 18, 2026$0.00
$-59.32
- OVER
Newcastle United FC vs. AFC Bournemouth: O/U 10.5 Total Corners
99 shares @ 56.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Apr 18, 2026$0.00
$-55.26
- NO
Iraq vs. Bolivia: Both Teams to Score
64 shares @ 54.7¢·now 0.0¢·exp Apr 1, 2026$0.00
$-35.11
- YES
AZ vs. Fortuna Sittard: Both Teams to Score
63 shares @ 57.7¢·now 0.0¢·exp Apr 4, 2026$0.00
$-36.36
- YES
Will Racing Club de Lens win on 2026-04-04?
50 shares @ 40.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Apr 4, 2026$0.00
$-20.00
- OVER
Paris Saint-Germain FC vs. Liverpool FC: O/U 10.5 Total Corners
40 shares @ 51.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Apr 8, 2026$0.00
$-20.36
- YES
Paris Saint-Germain FC vs. Liverpool FC: Both Teams to Score
35 shares @ 60.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Apr 8, 2026$0.00
$-20.75
- OVER
Liverpool FC vs. Tottenham Hotspur FC: O/U 2.5
27 shares @ 70.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Mar 15, 2026$0.00
$-19.14
- NO
Will the Court Force Trump to Refund Tariffs?
14 shares @ 71.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Jun 30, 2026$0.00
$-10.00
Recent activity
- TRADEBUYNewcastle United FC vs. AFC Bournemouth: O/U 10.5 Total Corners$11.20Apr 18, 13:56 UTC
- TRADEBUYNewcastle United FC vs. AFC Bournemouth: O/U 10.5 Total Corners$44.80Apr 18, 13:54 UTC
- REDEEMChelsea FC vs. Manchester City FC: O/U 10.5 Total Corners$34.64Apr 13, 03:12 UTC
- TRADEBUYChelsea FC vs. Manchester City FC: O/U 10.5 Total Corners$5.83Apr 12, 15:29 UTC
- TRADEBUYChelsea FC vs. Manchester City FC: O/U 10.5 Total Corners$10.27Apr 12, 15:29 UTC
- REDEEMWill Brighton & Hove Albion FC win on 2026-04-11?$26.68Apr 12, 05:48 UTC
- REDEEMWill Brentford FC win on 2026-04-11?$29.59Apr 12, 05:48 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Brighton & Hove Albion FC win on 2026-04-11?$16.47Apr 11, 14:01 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Brentford FC win on 2026-04-11?$16.50Apr 11, 14:00 UTC
- TRADEBUYParis Saint-Germain FC vs. Liverpool FC: O/U 10.5 Total Corners$10.47Apr 8, 18:52 UTC
- TRADEBUYParis Saint-Germain FC vs. Liverpool FC: O/U 10.5 Total Corners$10.05Apr 8, 18:51 UTC
- TRADEBUYParis Saint-Germain FC vs. Liverpool FC: Both Teams to Score$21.00Apr 8, 18:50 UTC
- REDEEMWill FC Barcelona win on 2026-04-04?$41.51Apr 5, 14:22 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill FC Barcelona win on 2026-04-04?$20.24Apr 4, 18:26 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Racing Club de Lens win on 2026-04-04?$20.00Apr 4, 18:21 UTC
- TRADEBUYAZ vs. Fortuna Sittard: Both Teams to Score$8.86Apr 4, 16:11 UTC
- TRADEBUYAZ vs. Fortuna Sittard: Both Teams to Score$1.39Apr 4, 15:53 UTC
- TRADEBUYAZ vs. Fortuna Sittard: Both Teams to Score$26.10Apr 4, 15:12 UTC
- REDEEMWill Rayo Vallecano de Madrid win on 2026-04-03?$76.59Apr 4, 02:17 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Rayo Vallecano de Madrid win on 2026-04-03?$38.88Apr 3, 19:29 UTC
Persistent ledger timeline
persistentNo trades for this wallet in Orrery's persistent ledger yet. The whale-ingest cron writes ≥ $5k trades every 10 minutes; check back after a recovery window.
Ledger intelligence
persistent7d volume
$0.00
0 trades
30d volume
$0.00
0 trades
Buy share
50%
Sample
low
0 ledger trades
No persistent whale trades for this wallet yet. The live Data API score above can still be useful, but the durable ledger sample is empty.
Profile dimensions
Trade count + how recently they were active. Low = dormant.
How trustworthy the win-rate number is, based on sample size of closed markets.
Share of trades concentrated in their top category.
Share of positions taken while the market was still uncertain (30–70¢) rather than after direction was obvious.
How risky to blindly copy. Higher = riskier — large size, single-position exposure, or thin win-rate sample.
- Trades (all time)
- 36
- Avg trade size
- $17.65
- Top category
- —
- Category concentration
- 0%
- First seen
- Mar 6, 17:22 UTC
- Last active
- Apr 18, 13:56 UTC
- Win rate sample
- 0 closed
The single Activity score is kept for the leaderboard sort. The five dimensions above are the canonical read — copy-risk bar is inverted so green is always "better for the user".