Outrageous-Prune
0xcd96c0214d2a88c932e52e47c723ed1fd93c43c4
Wallet digest
Activity score
35/100
Performance: thin sample
Open positions
1
Open notional
$0.00
Total PnL
$-20.00
Realised
$0.00
Win rate
n/a
too few closed
Recent activity
- REDEEMNBA: Will the Warriors beat the Pacers by more than 4.5 points in their December 13 matchup?$0.00Dec 19, 01:25 UTC
- REDEEMNBA: Will the Nuggets beat the Wizards by more than 4.5 points in their December 13 matchup?$0.00Dec 19, 01:24 UTC
- REDEEMNBA: Will the Nuggets beat the Wizards by more than 4.5 points in their December 13 matchup?$21.53Dec 19, 01:24 UTC
- REDEEMNBA: Who will win the Grizzlies v. Suns game on November 12th?$0.00Dec 14, 05:35 UTC
- REDEEMNBA: Will the 76ers beat the Raptors by more than 2.5 points in their November 11th matchup?$2.40Nov 13, 01:15 UTC
Persistent ledger timeline
persistentNo trades for this wallet in Orrery's persistent ledger yet. The whale-ingest cron writes ≥ $5k trades every 10 minutes; check back after a recovery window.
Ledger intelligence
persistent7d volume
$0.00
0 trades
30d volume
$0.00
0 trades
Buy share
50%
Sample
low
0 ledger trades
No persistent whale trades for this wallet yet. The live Data API score above can still be useful, but the durable ledger sample is empty.
Profile dimensions
Trade count + how recently they were active. Low = dormant.
How trustworthy the win-rate number is, based on sample size of closed markets.
Share of trades concentrated in their top category.
Share of positions taken while the market was still uncertain (30–70¢) rather than after direction was obvious.
How risky to blindly copy. Higher = riskier — large size, single-position exposure, or thin win-rate sample.
- Trades (all time)
- 0
- Avg trade size
- $0.00
- Top category
- —
- Category concentration
- 0%
- First seen
- Nov 13, 01:15 UTC
- Last active
- Dec 19, 01:25 UTC
- Win rate sample
- 0 closed
The single Activity score is kept for the leaderboard sort. The five dimensions above are the canonical read — copy-risk bar is inverted so green is always "better for the user".