0xce3d12fca8624f2189f02be0b176257c7d50acef
0xce3d12fca8624f2189f02be0b176257c7d50acef
Wallet digest
Activity score
64/100
Performance: thin sample
Open positions
3
Open notional
$5.50
Total PnL
$0.03
Realised
$0.00
Win rate
n/a
too few closed
Largest open positions
- UP
Bitcoin Up or Down - January 15, 9:00AM-9:15AM ET
5 shares @ 99.0¢·now 100.0¢·exp Jan 15, 2026$5.50
$0.05
- UP
Bitcoin Up or Down - January 15, 8:30AM-8:45AM ET
2 shares @ 1.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Jan 15, 2026$0.00
$-0.02
- YES
Will Trump nominate Arthur Laffer as the next Fed chair?
2 shares @ 0.1¢·now 0.0¢·exp Dec 31, 2026$0.00
$-0.00
Recent activity
- TRADEBUYBitcoin Up or Down - January 15, 9:00AM-9:15AM ET$5.45Jan 15, 14:10 UTC
- TRADEBUYBitcoin Up or Down - January 15, 8:30AM-8:45AM ET$0.02Jan 15, 13:42 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Trump nominate Arthur Laffer as the next Fed chair?$0.00Jan 14, 12:19 UTC
Persistent ledger timeline
persistentNo trades for this wallet in Orrery's persistent ledger yet. The whale-ingest cron writes ≥ $5k trades every 10 minutes; check back after a recovery window.
Ledger intelligence
persistent7d volume
$0.00
0 trades
30d volume
$0.00
0 trades
Buy share
50%
Sample
low
0 ledger trades
No persistent whale trades for this wallet yet. The live Data API score above can still be useful, but the durable ledger sample is empty.
Profile dimensions
Trade count + how recently they were active. Low = dormant.
How trustworthy the win-rate number is, based on sample size of closed markets.
Share of trades concentrated in their top category.
Share of positions taken while the market was still uncertain (30–70¢) rather than after direction was obvious.
How risky to blindly copy. Higher = riskier — large size, single-position exposure, or thin win-rate sample.
- Trades (all time)
- 3
- Avg trade size
- $1.82
- Top category
- —
- Category concentration
- 0%
- First seen
- Jan 14, 12:19 UTC
- Last active
- Jan 15, 14:10 UTC
- Win rate sample
- 0 closed
The single Activity score is kept for the leaderboard sort. The five dimensions above are the canonical read — copy-risk bar is inverted so green is always "better for the user".