Nonstop-Might
0xcf1980894dae64fbdacd026d49f756b1b61df24e
Wallet digest
Activity score
43/100
Performance: thin sample
Open positions
2
Open notional
$0.00
Total PnL
$-114.96
Realised
$0.00
Win rate
n/a
too few closed
Recent activity
- REDEEMWill Peter Dutton be the next Prime Minister of Australia after the 2025 election?$0.00May 13, 12:46 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Peter Dutton be the next Prime Minister of Australia after the 2025 election?$58.08May 3, 09:35 UTC
- TRADEBUYTrump ends Ukraine war in first 90 days?$112.96Apr 23, 11:55 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Dogecoin reach $0.28 in April?$1.00Apr 23, 11:36 UTC
- TRADEBUYTrump ends Ukraine war in first 90 days?$1.00Apr 23, 11:29 UTC
- TRADESELLWill the price of Ethereum be between $1600 and $1700 on Apr 25?$2.57Apr 23, 11:17 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill the price of Ethereum be between $1600 and $1700 on Apr 25?$3.00Apr 23, 11:16 UTC
Persistent ledger timeline
persistentNo trades for this wallet in Orrery's persistent ledger yet. The whale-ingest cron writes ≥ $5k trades every 10 minutes; check back after a recovery window.
Ledger intelligence
persistent7d volume
$0.00
0 trades
30d volume
$0.00
0 trades
Buy share
50%
Sample
low
0 ledger trades
No persistent whale trades for this wallet yet. The live Data API score above can still be useful, but the durable ledger sample is empty.
Profile dimensions
Trade count + how recently they were active. Low = dormant.
How trustworthy the win-rate number is, based on sample size of closed markets.
Share of trades concentrated in their top category.
Share of positions taken while the market was still uncertain (30–70¢) rather than after direction was obvious.
How risky to blindly copy. Higher = riskier — large size, single-position exposure, or thin win-rate sample.
- Trades (all time)
- 6
- Avg trade size
- $29.77
- Top category
- —
- Category concentration
- 0%
- First seen
- Apr 23, 11:16 UTC
- Last active
- May 13, 12:46 UTC
- Win rate sample
- 0 closed
The single Activity score is kept for the leaderboard sort. The five dimensions above are the canonical read — copy-risk bar is inverted so green is always "better for the user".