Powerless-Pea
0xd01358afcbb1de91bd134edbd90affcc054ec6d7
Activity score
91/100
Performance: thin sample
Open positions
1
Open notional
$159.92
Total PnL
$9.52
Realised
$0.00
Win rate
n/a
too few closed
Largest open positions
Recent activity
- TRADEBUYEthereum Up or Down - May 10, 10AM ET$151.032h ago
- REDEEMEthereum Up or Down - May 9, 6PM ET$279.8013h ago
- REDEEMEthereum Up or Down - May 9, 2PM ET$22.0018h ago
- TRADEBUYEthereum Up or Down - May 9, 6PM ET$76.3318h ago
- TRADEBUYEthereum Up or Down - May 9, 6PM ET$98.4218h ago
- TRADEBUYEthereum Up or Down - May 9, 6PM ET$9.8018h ago
- REDEEMEthereum Up or Down - May 9, 12PM ET$0.0020h ago
- TRADEBUYEthereum Up or Down - May 9, 2PM ET$20.5622h ago
- REDEEMEthereum Up or Down - May 9, 10AM ET$0.0023h ago
- TRADEBUYEthereum Up or Down - May 9, 12PM ET$1.861d ago
- TRADEBUYEthereum Up or Down - May 9, 10AM ET$0.891d ago
- REDEEMEthereum Up or Down - May 8, 5PM ET$0.002d ago
- REDEEMEthereum Up or Down - May 8, 2PM ET$0.002d ago
- TRADEBUYEthereum Up or Down - May 8, 5PM ET$6.422d ago
- REDEEMEthereum Up or Down - May 8, 1PM ET$0.002d ago
- TRADEBUYEthereum Up or Down - May 8, 2PM ET$2.602d ago
- TRADEBUYEthereum Up or Down - May 8, 2PM ET$2.542d ago
- TRADEBUYEthereum Up or Down - May 8, 2PM ET$4.002d ago
- TRADEBUYEthereum Up or Down - May 8, 2PM ET$0.642d ago
- TRADEBUYEthereum Up or Down - May 8, 1PM ET$2.122d ago
Profile dimensions
Trade count + how recently they were active. Low = dormant.
How trustworthy the win-rate number is, based on sample size of closed markets.
Share of trades concentrated in their top category.
Share of positions taken while the market was still uncertain (30–70¢) rather than after direction was obvious.
How risky to blindly copy. Higher = riskier — large size, single-position exposure, or thin win-rate sample.
- Trades (all time)
- 38
- Avg trade size
- $14.34
- Top category
- —
- Category concentration
- 0%
- First seen
- 3d ago
- Last active
- 2h ago
- Win rate sample
- 0 closed
The single Activity score is kept for the leaderboard sort. The five dimensions above are the canonical read — copy-risk bar is inverted so green is always "better for the user".
