Rash-Crewmen
0xd29738d7a981bbe4ede05b31bbf726531a5b2c15
Wallet digest
Activity score
50/100
Performance: thin sample
Open positions
8
Open notional
$0.00
Total PnL
$-9.7K
Realised
$-449.08
Win rate
n/a
too few closed
Largest open positions
- TIEN
Rolex Paris Masters: Learner Tien vs Andrey Rublev
9177 shares @ 38.3¢·now 0.0¢·exp Nov 4, 2025$0.00
$-3.5K
- YES
Will Real Betis win on 2025-10-27?
5154 shares @ 29.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Oct 27, 2025$0.00
$-1.5K
- MICHELSEN
Rolex Paris Masters: Alex Michelsen vs Zizou Bergs
3549 shares @ 42.3¢·now 0.0¢·exp Nov 3, 2025$0.00
$-1.5K
- MAROZSAN
Rolex Paris Masters: Fabian Marozsan vs Arthur Rinderknech
2474 shares @ 31.7¢·now 0.0¢·exp Nov 3, 2025$0.00
$-785.39
- ALCARAZ
Rolex Paris Masters: Carlos Alcaraz vs Cameron Norrie
2162 shares @ 27.8¢·now 0.0¢·exp Nov 4, 2025$0.00
$-601.00
- YES
Will RC Strasbourg Alsace win on 2025-10-26?
1733 shares @ 27.7¢·now 0.0¢·exp Oct 26, 2025$0.00
$-479.62
- WONG
Prudential Hong Kong Tennis Open: Cody Wong vs Viktoria Morvayova
1570 shares @ 49.4¢·now 0.0¢·exp Nov 3, 2025$0.00
$-774.80
- KOBORI
Prudential Hong Kong Tennis Open: Momoko Kobori vs Ajla Tomljanovic
930 shares @ 10.7¢·now 0.0¢·exp Nov 3, 2025$0.00
$-100.00
Recent activity
- TRADEBUYRolex Paris Masters: Learner Tien vs Andrey Rublev$618.79Oct 28, 20:29 UTC
- TRADEBUYRolex Paris Masters: Learner Tien vs Andrey Rublev$400.00Oct 28, 20:29 UTC
- TRADEBUYRolex Paris Masters: Learner Tien vs Andrey Rublev$1.2KOct 28, 20:29 UTC
- TRADEBUYRolex Paris Masters: Learner Tien vs Andrey Rublev$500.00Oct 28, 20:28 UTC
- TRADEBUYRolex Paris Masters: Learner Tien vs Andrey Rublev$295.85Oct 28, 20:28 UTC
- TRADEBUYRolex Paris Masters: Learner Tien vs Andrey Rublev$500.00Oct 28, 20:27 UTC
- TRADEBUYRolex Paris Masters: Carlos Alcaraz vs Cameron Norrie$601.00Oct 28, 20:24 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Real Betis win on 2025-10-27?$494.59Oct 27, 19:11 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Real Betis win on 2025-10-27?$500.00Oct 27, 19:11 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Real Betis win on 2025-10-27?$500.00Oct 27, 19:11 UTC
- TRADEBUYRolex Paris Masters: Alex Michelsen vs Zizou Bergs$500.00Oct 27, 16:14 UTC
- TRADEBUYRolex Paris Masters: Alex Michelsen vs Zizou Bergs$500.00Oct 27, 16:13 UTC
- TRADEBUYRolex Paris Masters: Alex Michelsen vs Zizou Bergs$500.00Oct 27, 16:12 UTC
- TRADESELLRolex Paris Masters: Aleksandar Kovacevic vs Miomir Kecmanovic$10.4KOct 27, 16:11 UTC
- TRADEBUYRolex Paris Masters: Aleksandar Kovacevic vs Miomir Kecmanovic$1.3KOct 27, 14:54 UTC
- TRADEBUYRolex Paris Masters: Aleksandar Kovacevic vs Miomir Kecmanovic$500.00Oct 27, 14:53 UTC
- TRADEBUYRolex Paris Masters: Aleksandar Kovacevic vs Miomir Kecmanovic$500.00Oct 27, 14:52 UTC
- TRADEBUYRolex Paris Masters: Aleksandar Kovacevic vs Miomir Kecmanovic$500.00Oct 27, 14:51 UTC
- TRADEBUYRolex Paris Masters: Aleksandar Kovacevic vs Miomir Kecmanovic$375.00Oct 27, 14:51 UTC
- TRADEBUYRolex Paris Masters: Fabian Marozsan vs Arthur Rinderknech$285.39Oct 27, 14:42 UTC
Persistent ledger timeline
persistentNo trades for this wallet in Orrery's persistent ledger yet. The whale-ingest cron writes ≥ $5k trades every 10 minutes; check back after a recovery window.
Ledger intelligence
persistent7d volume
$0.00
0 trades
30d volume
$0.00
0 trades
Buy share
50%
Sample
low
0 ledger trades
No persistent whale trades for this wallet yet. The live Data API score above can still be useful, but the durable ledger sample is empty.
Profile dimensions
Trade count + how recently they were active. Low = dormant.
How trustworthy the win-rate number is, based on sample size of closed markets.
Share of trades concentrated in their top category.
Share of positions taken while the market was still uncertain (30–70¢) rather than after direction was obvious.
How risky to blindly copy. Higher = riskier — large size, single-position exposure, or thin win-rate sample.
- Trades (all time)
- 38
- Avg trade size
- $1.6K
- Top category
- —
- Category concentration
- 0%
- First seen
- Oct 26, 14:46 UTC
- Last active
- Oct 28, 20:29 UTC
- Win rate sample
- 1 closed
The single Activity score is kept for the leaderboard sort. The five dimensions above are the canonical read — copy-risk bar is inverted so green is always "better for the user".