Steel-Whirlpool
0xd336d7df5229c20e0f847fe51605fc53ff84f5e8
Wallet digest
Activity score
50/100
Performance: thin sample
Open positions
6
Open notional
$0.00
Total PnL
$-47.79
Realised
$-1.99
Win rate
n/a
too few closed
Largest open positions
- YES
Fed increases interest rates by 25+ bps after January 2025 meeting?
10001 shares @ 0.2¢·now 0.0¢·exp Jan 29, 2025$0.00
$-19.99
- NO
Will Powell say "crypto" or "Bitcoin" during January press conference?
500 shares @ 1.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Jan 29, 2025$0.00
$-5.00
- YES
Trump nominates Elon Musk to Cabinet?
445 shares @ 1.1¢·now 0.0¢·exp Jan 31, 2025$0.00
$-4.89
- YES
Fed decreases interest rates by 25 bps after January 2025 meeting?
306 shares @ 1.9¢·now 0.0¢·exp Jan 29, 2025$0.00
$-5.82
- NO
No change in Fed interest rates after January 2025 meeting?
255 shares @ 2.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Jan 29, 2025$0.00
$-5.10
- YES
Will Powell say "inflation" 60 or more times during January press conference?
125 shares @ 4.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Jan 29, 2025$0.00
$-5.00
Recent activity
- TRADEBUYWill Powell say "crypto" or "Bitcoin" during January press conference?$5.00Jan 29, 20:18 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Powell say "inflation" 60 or more times during January press conference?$5.00Jan 29, 20:06 UTC
- TRADESELLWill Powell say "inflation" 40 or more times during January press conference?$100.00Jan 29, 19:55 UTC
- TRADEBUYNo change in Fed interest rates after January 2025 meeting?$5.10Jan 29, 17:06 UTC
- TRADESELLFed decreases interest rates by 25 bps after January 2025 meeting?$5.10Jan 29, 17:06 UTC
- TRADEBUYFed decreases interest rates by 25 bps after January 2025 meeting?$3.72Jan 29, 17:05 UTC
- TRADESELLTrump nominates Elon Musk to Cabinet?$0.08Jan 29, 17:04 UTC
- TRADESELLTrump nominates Elon Musk to Cabinet?$0.04Jan 29, 17:04 UTC
- TRADESELLTrump nominates Elon Musk to Cabinet?$3.60Jan 29, 17:03 UTC
- TRADEBUYFed decreases interest rates by 25 bps after January 2025 meeting?$7.80Jan 29, 17:02 UTC
- TRADESELLWill Powell say "inflation" 40 or more times during January press conference?$7.80Jan 29, 17:01 UTC
- TRADESELLWill Bitcoin reach $110,000 by March 31?$233.88Jan 27, 21:01 UTC
- REDEEMWill Bitcoin reach $85,000 in December?$0.00Jan 27, 16:04 UTC
- REDEEMWill Trump say "Israel" during Fox News Oval Office interview?$0.00Jan 27, 16:04 UTC
- REDEEMWill Biden say "ceasefire" during farewell address?$0.00Jan 27, 16:03 UTC
- REDEEMWill Trump withdraw from Paris climate agreement in first 100 days?$0.00Jan 27, 16:03 UTC
- REDEEMWill the FED change rates to another level after December meeting?$0.00Jan 27, 16:03 UTC
- REDEEMWill Bitcoin reach $90,000 in December?$0.00Jan 27, 16:03 UTC
- TRADESELLWill Powell say "inflation" 40 or more times during January press conference?$142.72Jan 27, 16:02 UTC
- TRADESELLWill Powell say "inflation" 40 or more times during January press conference?$136.80Jan 27, 15:59 UTC
Persistent ledger timeline
persistentNo trades for this wallet in Orrery's persistent ledger yet. The whale-ingest cron writes ≥ $5k trades every 10 minutes; check back after a recovery window.
Ledger intelligence
persistent7d volume
$0.00
0 trades
30d volume
$0.00
0 trades
Buy share
50%
Sample
low
0 ledger trades
No persistent whale trades for this wallet yet. The live Data API score above can still be useful, but the durable ledger sample is empty.
Profile dimensions
Trade count + how recently they were active. Low = dormant.
How trustworthy the win-rate number is, based on sample size of closed markets.
Share of trades concentrated in their top category.
Share of positions taken while the market was still uncertain (30–70¢) rather than after direction was obvious.
How risky to blindly copy. Higher = riskier — large size, single-position exposure, or thin win-rate sample.
- Trades (all time)
- 44
- Avg trade size
- $75.87
- Top category
- —
- Category concentration
- 0%
- First seen
- Dec 28, 00:16 UTC
- Last active
- Jan 29, 20:18 UTC
- Win rate sample
- 2 closed
The single Activity score is kept for the leaderboard sort. The five dimensions above are the canonical read — copy-risk bar is inverted so green is always "better for the user".