Tense-Savory
0xd3993c60aadf7eff9832c8a7fb029e7e5309185f
Wallet digest
Activity score
50/100
Performance: thin sample
Open positions
24
Open notional
$0.00
Total PnL
$-3.7K
Realised
$0.00
Win rate
n/a
too few closed
Largest open positions
showing 10 of 24- KNICKS
Knicks vs. Cavaliers
600 shares @ 40.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Feb 25, 2026$0.00
$-240.00
- NO
Will Sunderland AFC win on 2026-02-02?
600 shares @ 48.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Feb 2, 2026$0.00
$-288.00
- BUCKS
Celtics vs. Bucks
550 shares @ 26.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Mar 3, 2026$0.00
$-143.00
- YES
Will SK Brann win on 2026-02-19?
500 shares @ 23.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Feb 19, 2026$0.00
$-115.00
- NO
Will Manchester United FC win on 2026-02-07?
500 shares @ 39.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Feb 7, 2026$0.00
$-195.00
- ASTRALIS
Counter-Strike: FUT Esports vs Astralis (BO3) - ESL Pro League Stage 1
480 shares @ 40.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Mar 3, 2026$0.00
$-192.00
- NO
Will Real Madrid CF win on 2026-03-11?
450 shares @ 75.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Mar 11, 2026$0.00
$-337.39
- NO
Will FC Barcelona win on 2026-03-08?
400 shares @ 41.9¢·now 0.0¢·exp Mar 8, 2026$0.00
$-167.70
- DEVILS
Islanders vs. Devils
400 shares @ 51.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Feb 6, 2026$0.00
$-204.00
- RAPTORS
Pistons vs. Raptors
350 shares @ 48.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Feb 12, 2026$0.00
$-168.00
Recent activity
- MAKER_REBATE$1.28Apr 24, 01:00 UTC
- TRADESELLLoL: LGD Gaming vs EDward Gaming (BO3) - LPL Group Nirvana$341.00Apr 23, 08:46 UTC
- TRADEBUYLoL: LGD Gaming vs EDward Gaming (BO3) - LPL Group Nirvana$152.97Apr 23, 08:14 UTC
- TRADEBUYLoL: LGD Gaming vs EDward Gaming (BO3) - LPL Group Nirvana$199.03Apr 23, 08:14 UTC
- REDEEMUS x Iran diplomatic meeting by April 18, 2026?$350.00Apr 22, 07:42 UTC
- REWARD$1.03Apr 17, 00:00 UTC
- TRADEBUYUS x Iran diplomatic meeting by April 18, 2026?$322.00Apr 16, 15:08 UTC
- TRADESELLUS x Iran permanent peace deal by April 22, 2026?$332.00Apr 16, 11:46 UTC
- TRADEBUYUS x Iran permanent peace deal by April 22, 2026?$336.00Apr 16, 11:11 UTC
- TRADESELLUS x Iran permanent peace deal by April 22, 2026?$264.18Apr 16, 08:59 UTC
- TRADESELLUS x Iran permanent peace deal by April 22, 2026?$8.15Apr 16, 08:58 UTC
- TRADESELLUS x Iran permanent peace deal by April 22, 2026?$8.15Apr 16, 08:57 UTC
- TRADESELLUS x Iran permanent peace deal by April 22, 2026?$31.55Apr 16, 08:57 UTC
- TRADEBUYUS x Iran permanent peace deal by April 22, 2026?$312.00Apr 16, 08:52 UTC
- TRADESELLUS x Iran permanent peace deal by April 22, 2026?$133.16Apr 16, 08:35 UTC
- TRADESELLUS x Iran permanent peace deal by April 22, 2026?$5.00Apr 16, 08:34 UTC
- TRADESELLUS x Iran permanent peace deal by April 22, 2026?$3.90Apr 16, 08:33 UTC
- TRADESELLUS x Iran permanent peace deal by April 22, 2026?$5.00Apr 16, 08:32 UTC
- TRADESELLUS x Iran permanent peace deal by April 22, 2026?$5.00Apr 16, 08:32 UTC
- TRADESELLUS x Iran permanent peace deal by April 22, 2026?$1.90Apr 16, 08:31 UTC
Persistent ledger timeline
persistentNo trades for this wallet in Orrery's persistent ledger yet. The whale-ingest cron writes ≥ $5k trades every 10 minutes; check back after a recovery window.
Ledger intelligence
persistent7d volume
$0.00
0 trades
30d volume
$0.00
0 trades
Buy share
50%
Sample
low
0 ledger trades
No persistent whale trades for this wallet yet. The live Data API score above can still be useful, but the durable ledger sample is empty.
Profile dimensions
Trade count + how recently they were active. Low = dormant.
How trustworthy the win-rate number is, based on sample size of closed markets.
Share of trades concentrated in their top category.
Share of positions taken while the market was still uncertain (30–70¢) rather than after direction was obvious.
How risky to blindly copy. Higher = riskier — large size, single-position exposure, or thin win-rate sample.
- Trades (all time)
- 40
- Avg trade size
- $249.94
- Top category
- —
- Category concentration
- 0%
- First seen
- Mar 30, 08:03 UTC
- Last active
- Apr 24, 01:00 UTC
- Win rate sample
- 0 closed
The single Activity score is kept for the leaderboard sort. The five dimensions above are the canonical read — copy-risk bar is inverted so green is always "better for the user".