Useless-Dragonfruit
0xd3ee16a0a5ce96a6e51ecd5eee6bdc5c3a6545f0
Activity score
72/100
Performance: thin sample
Open positions
1
Open notional
$9.51
Total PnL
$-0.49
Realised
$0.00
Win rate
n/a
too few closed
Largest open positions
Recent activity
- TRADEBUYAVS Futebol vs. FC Porto: O/U 1.5$10.052h ago
- REDEEMSpread: Yokohama F·Marinos (-2.5)$5.106h ago
- REDEEMSpread: Yokohama F·Marinos (-1.5)$5.496h ago
- REDEEMWill Yokohama F·Marinos vs. Kashima Antlers end in a draw?$2.257h ago
- TRADEBUYWill Yokohama F·Marinos vs. Kashima Antlers end in a draw?$2.0110h ago
- TRADEBUYSpread: Yokohama F·Marinos (-2.5)$5.0012h ago
- TRADEBUYSpread: Yokohama F·Marinos (-1.5)$5.0112h ago
- REDEEMColorado Rockies vs. Philadelphia Phillies$5.2616h ago
- TRADEBUYColorado Rockies vs. Philadelphia Phillies$5.0118h ago
- TRADESELLSpread: US Lecce (-1.5)$9.1718h ago
- REDEEMSpread: Brentford FC (-1.5)$10.3218h ago
- TRADEBUYSpread: US Lecce (-1.5)$9.011d ago
- TRADEBUYSpread: Brentford FC (-1.5)$10.011d ago
- TRADESELLSpread: Chelsea FC (-1.5)$10.651d ago
- TRADEBUYSpread: Chelsea FC (-1.5)$10.021d ago
- REDEEMSpread: Cerezo Ōsaka (-2.5)$7.291d ago
- REDEEMAuckland FC vs. Adelaide United FC: O/U 3.5$11.111d ago
- TRADEBUYSpread: Cerezo Ōsaka (-2.5)$7.011d ago
- REDEEMWill SC Paderborn 07 win on 2026-05-08?$0.001d ago
- REDEEMSpread: Beijing Guoan FC (-1.5)$0.001d ago
Profile dimensions
Trade count + how recently they were active. Low = dormant.
How trustworthy the win-rate number is, based on sample size of closed markets.
Share of trades concentrated in their top category.
Share of positions taken while the market was still uncertain (30–70¢) rather than after direction was obvious.
How risky to blindly copy. Higher = riskier — large size, single-position exposure, or thin win-rate sample.
- Trades (all time)
- 30
- Avg trade size
- $7.63
- Top category
- —
- Category concentration
- 0%
- First seen
- 12d ago
- Last active
- 2h ago
- Win rate sample
- 0 closed
The single Activity score is kept for the leaderboard sort. The five dimensions above are the canonical read — copy-risk bar is inverted so green is always "better for the user".
