Vast-Assessment
0xd6d1ce1c252b839316e2e29664bed4c46c65074b
Wallet digest
Activity score
50/100
Performance: thin sample
Open positions
40
Open notional
$0.00
Total PnL
$-538.52
Realised
$0.00
Win rate
n/a
too few closed
Largest open positions
showing 10 of 40- JILIN NORTHEAST TIGERS
Guangdong Southern Tigers vs. Jilin Northeast Tigers
169 shares @ 11.5¢·now 0.0¢·exp Apr 17, 2026$0.00
$-19.47
- JILIN NORTHEAST TIGERS
Zhejiang Lions vs. Jilin Northeast Tigers
91 shares @ 11.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Mar 25, 2026$0.00
$-10.00
- GUANGDONG SOUTHERN TIGERS
Shandong Hi-Speed Kirin vs. Guangdong Southern Tigers
89 shares @ 33.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Apr 13, 2026$0.00
$-29.21
- LIAONING FLYING LEOPARDS
Qingdao Eagles vs. Liaoning Flying Leopards
87 shares @ 33.8¢·now 0.0¢·exp Apr 17, 2026$0.00
$-29.40
- GUANGZHOU LOONG LIONS
Guangzhou Loong Lions vs. Beijing Ducks
86 shares @ 38.8¢·now 0.0¢·exp Mar 21, 2026$0.00
$-33.34
- NO
Will the price of Bitcoin be above $76,000 on April 17?
76 shares @ 64.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Apr 17, 2026$0.00
$-48.70
- BEIJING ROYAL FIGHTERS
Zhejiang Lions vs. Beijing Royal Fighters
67 shares @ 29.9¢·now 0.0¢·exp Mar 27, 2026$0.00
$-20.00
- ZHEJIANG LIONS
Shanxi Loongs vs. Zhejiang Lions
66 shares @ 44.4¢·now 0.0¢·exp Apr 22, 2026$0.00
$-29.50
- BUCKS
Bucks vs. 76ers
61 shares @ 8.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Apr 12, 2026$0.00
$-4.86
- JIANGSU DRAGONS
Zhejiang Lions vs. Jiangsu Dragons
56 shares @ 9.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Apr 5, 2026$0.00
$-5.00
Recent activity
- REDEEMTianjin Pioneers vs. Qingdao Eagles$16.20Apr 18, 16:11 UTC
- REDEEMShenzhen Leopards vs. Ningbo Rockets$16.35Apr 18, 16:11 UTC
- REDEEMXinjiang Flying Tigers vs. Shanghai Sharks$26.50Apr 18, 16:11 UTC
- REDEEMShandong Hi-Speed Kirin vs. Beijing Ducks$27.11Apr 18, 16:11 UTC
- TRADEBUYXinjiang Flying Tigers vs. Shanghai Sharks$20.81Apr 17, 09:42 UTC
- TRADEBUYNanjing Monkey King vs. Zhejiang Lions$3.00Apr 17, 09:42 UTC
- TRADEBUYShandong Hi-Speed Kirin vs. Beijing Ducks$17.00Apr 17, 09:41 UTC
- TRADEBUYTianjin Pioneers vs. Qingdao Eagles$10.00Apr 17, 09:41 UTC
- TRADEBUYShenzhen Leopards vs. Ningbo Rockets$13.00Apr 17, 09:41 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill the price of Bitcoin be above $76,000 on April 17?$50.00Apr 17, 09:39 UTC
- REDEEMWill the price of Bitcoin be above $74,000 on April 15?$92.21Apr 17, 09:35 UTC
- TRADEBUYBeijing Royal Fighters vs. Shandong Hi-Speed Kirin$20.00Apr 15, 11:24 UTC
- TRADEBUYShanxi Loongs vs. Zhejiang Lions$30.00Apr 15, 11:23 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill the price of Bitcoin be above $74,000 on April 15?$50.00Apr 15, 11:22 UTC
- TRADESELLWill the price of Bitcoin be above $74,000 on April 15?$130.84Apr 15, 11:17 UTC
- REDEEMBeijing Ducks vs. Qingdao Eagles$72.82Apr 15, 06:07 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill the price of Bitcoin be above $74,000 on April 15?$50.00Apr 14, 14:36 UTC
- TRADEBUYBeijing Ducks vs. Qingdao Eagles$50.00Apr 14, 11:20 UTC
- TRADEBUYShandong Hi-Speed Kirin vs. Liaoning Flying Leopards$10.00Apr 13, 12:18 UTC
- REDEEMSuns vs. Thunder$16.87Apr 13, 12:16 UTC
Persistent ledger timeline
persistentNo trades for this wallet in Orrery's persistent ledger yet. The whale-ingest cron writes ≥ $5k trades every 10 minutes; check back after a recovery window.
Ledger intelligence
persistent7d volume
$0.00
0 trades
30d volume
$0.00
0 trades
Buy share
50%
Sample
low
0 ledger trades
No persistent whale trades for this wallet yet. The live Data API score above can still be useful, but the durable ledger sample is empty.
Profile dimensions
Trade count + how recently they were active. Low = dormant.
How trustworthy the win-rate number is, based on sample size of closed markets.
Share of trades concentrated in their top category.
Share of positions taken while the market was still uncertain (30–70¢) rather than after direction was obvious.
How risky to blindly copy. Higher = riskier — large size, single-position exposure, or thin win-rate sample.
- Trades (all time)
- 35
- Avg trade size
- $23.42
- Top category
- —
- Category concentration
- 0%
- First seen
- Apr 6, 08:52 UTC
- Last active
- Apr 18, 16:11 UTC
- Win rate sample
- 0 closed
The single Activity score is kept for the leaderboard sort. The five dimensions above are the canonical read — copy-risk bar is inverted so green is always "better for the user".