Expensive-Psychologist
0xd6eec77f9e4ef4b330440d245c7969bbbef12269
Wallet digest
Activity score
42/100
Performance: thin sample
Open positions
4
Open notional
$0.00
Total PnL
$-12.00
Realised
$0.00
Win rate
n/a
too few closed
Largest open positions
- WIZARDS
Thunder vs. Wizards
33 shares @ 9.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Jan 19, 2025$0.00
$-3.00
- PELICANS
Pelicans vs. Celtics
30 shares @ 10.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Jan 19, 2025$0.00
$-3.00
- YES
Will Southampton win on 2025-01-16?
27 shares @ 11.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Jan 16, 2025$0.00
$-3.00
- JAZZ
Jazz vs. Suns
18 shares @ 17.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Jan 18, 2025$0.00
$-3.00
Recent activity
- TRADEBUYWill Southampton win on 2025-01-16?$3.00Jan 13, 15:19 UTC
- TRADEBUYPelicans vs. Celtics$3.00Jan 12, 13:41 UTC
- TRADEBUYThunder vs. Wizards$3.00Jan 12, 13:40 UTC
- TRADEBUYJazz vs. Suns$3.00Jan 11, 21:55 UTC
Persistent ledger timeline
persistentNo trades for this wallet in Orrery's persistent ledger yet. The whale-ingest cron writes ≥ $5k trades every 10 minutes; check back after a recovery window.
Ledger intelligence
persistent7d volume
$0.00
0 trades
30d volume
$0.00
0 trades
Buy share
50%
Sample
low
0 ledger trades
No persistent whale trades for this wallet yet. The live Data API score above can still be useful, but the durable ledger sample is empty.
Profile dimensions
Trade count + how recently they were active. Low = dormant.
How trustworthy the win-rate number is, based on sample size of closed markets.
Share of trades concentrated in their top category.
Share of positions taken while the market was still uncertain (30–70¢) rather than after direction was obvious.
How risky to blindly copy. Higher = riskier — large size, single-position exposure, or thin win-rate sample.
- Trades (all time)
- 4
- Avg trade size
- $3.00
- Top category
- —
- Category concentration
- 0%
- First seen
- Jan 11, 21:55 UTC
- Last active
- Jan 13, 15:19 UTC
- Win rate sample
- 0 closed
The single Activity score is kept for the leaderboard sort. The five dimensions above are the canonical read — copy-risk bar is inverted so green is always "better for the user".