Negligible-Oyster
0xd73ce7fc62b8734d2700c51f7e1d6b1381392e42
Wallet digest
Activity score
100/100
Performance: thin sample
Open positions
1
Open notional
$52.12
Total PnL
$27.27
Realised
$0.00
Win rate
n/a
too few closed
Recent activity
- TRADEBUYWill $Trump FDV be $25-30b on Feb 1?$24.85Jan 29, 20:24 UTC
- TRADESELLWill Lamar Jackson win NFL MVP for the 2024-25 season?$34.94Jan 29, 03:10 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Lamar Jackson win NFL MVP for the 2024-25 season?$32.26Jan 28, 15:28 UTC
- TRADESELLWill Inter Milan win the Serie A?$29.31Jan 27, 14:22 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Inter Milan win the Serie A?$29.88Jan 27, 00:59 UTC
- TRADESELLWill the AfD win 20-25% of the vote in the German election?$31.14Jan 16, 08:34 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill the AfD win 20-25% of the vote in the German election?$31.82Jan 13, 14:57 UTC
- TRADESELLYoon arrested by January 31?$47.78Jan 13, 06:38 UTC
- TRADEBUYYoon arrested by January 31?$49.59Jan 12, 11:03 UTC
Persistent ledger timeline
persistentNo trades for this wallet in Orrery's persistent ledger yet. The whale-ingest cron writes ≥ $5k trades every 10 minutes; check back after a recovery window.
Ledger intelligence
persistent7d volume
$0.00
0 trades
30d volume
$0.00
0 trades
Buy share
50%
Sample
low
0 ledger trades
No persistent whale trades for this wallet yet. The live Data API score above can still be useful, but the durable ledger sample is empty.
Profile dimensions
Trade count + how recently they were active. Low = dormant.
How trustworthy the win-rate number is, based on sample size of closed markets.
Share of trades concentrated in their top category.
Share of positions taken while the market was still uncertain (30–70¢) rather than after direction was obvious.
How risky to blindly copy. Higher = riskier — large size, single-position exposure, or thin win-rate sample.
- Trades (all time)
- 9
- Avg trade size
- $34.62
- Top category
- —
- Category concentration
- 0%
- First seen
- Jan 12, 11:03 UTC
- Last active
- Jan 29, 20:24 UTC
- Win rate sample
- 0 closed
The single Activity score is kept for the leaderboard sort. The five dimensions above are the canonical read — copy-risk bar is inverted so green is always "better for the user".