Verifiable-Subsection
0xd805caaa67fd4443f160a718c0e8724f1ef89831
Wallet digest
Activity score
44/100
Performance: thin sample
Open positions
3
Open notional
$0.00
Total PnL
$-81.75
Realised
$0.00
Win rate
n/a
too few closed
Largest open positions
Recent activity
- TRADEBUYAirbnb (ABNB) Up or Down on November 10?$0.95Nov 9, 11:23 UTC
- TRADEBUYNasdaq 100 (NDX) Up or Down on November 5?$57.60Nov 5, 05:19 UTC
- TRADEBUYPalantir (PLTR) Up or Down on November 4?$23.20Nov 4, 02:45 UTC
- REDEEMNetflix (NFLX) Up or Down on October 31?$20.00Nov 3, 08:36 UTC
- TRADEBUYNetflix (NFLX) Up or Down on October 31?$17.60Oct 31, 07:14 UTC
- REDEEMBNB Up or Down on October 20?$3.1KOct 21, 06:00 UTC
- TRADEBUYBNB Up or Down on October 20?$0.64Oct 20, 11:56 UTC
- TRADEBUYBNB Up or Down on October 20?$450.00Oct 20, 11:53 UTC
- TRADEBUYBNB Up or Down on October 20?$478.50Oct 20, 11:52 UTC
Persistent ledger timeline
persistentNo trades for this wallet in Orrery's persistent ledger yet. The whale-ingest cron writes ≥ $5k trades every 10 minutes; check back after a recovery window.
Ledger intelligence
persistent7d volume
$0.00
0 trades
30d volume
$0.00
0 trades
Buy share
50%
Sample
low
0 ledger trades
No persistent whale trades for this wallet yet. The live Data API score above can still be useful, but the durable ledger sample is empty.
Profile dimensions
Trade count + how recently they were active. Low = dormant.
How trustworthy the win-rate number is, based on sample size of closed markets.
Share of trades concentrated in their top category.
Share of positions taken while the market was still uncertain (30–70¢) rather than after direction was obvious.
How risky to blindly copy. Higher = riskier — large size, single-position exposure, or thin win-rate sample.
- Trades (all time)
- 7
- Avg trade size
- $146.93
- Top category
- —
- Category concentration
- 0%
- First seen
- Oct 20, 11:52 UTC
- Last active
- Nov 9, 11:23 UTC
- Win rate sample
- 0 closed
The single Activity score is kept for the leaderboard sort. The five dimensions above are the canonical read — copy-risk bar is inverted so green is always "better for the user".