0xd82c2e4fe2e75321ef2bbe2017bfce0585f087a6
0xd82c2e4fe2e75321ef2bbe2017bfce0585f087a6
Wallet digest
Activity score
62/100
Performance: thin sample
Open positions
1
Open notional
$95.00
Total PnL
$-155.00
Realised
$0.00
Win rate
n/a
too few closed
Recent activity
- TRADEBUYWill Fernando Dias da Costa win the 2025 Guinea-Bissau presidential election?$250.00Apr 27, 21:51 UTC
- YIELD$0.02Apr 23, 00:16 UTC
- TRADESELLWill Portugal win the 2026 FIFA World Cup?$256.22Apr 22, 19:24 UTC
- YIELD$0.02Apr 22, 00:15 UTC
- YIELD$0.02Apr 21, 00:10 UTC
- YIELD$0.02Apr 20, 00:12 UTC
- YIELD$0.02Apr 19, 00:13 UTC
- YIELD$0.01Apr 18, 00:13 UTC
- YIELD$0.00Apr 17, 00:10 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Portugal win the 2026 FIFA World Cup?$115.00Apr 16, 20:23 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Portugal win the 2026 FIFA World Cup?$125.00Apr 16, 12:53 UTC
Persistent ledger timeline
persistentNo trades for this wallet in Orrery's persistent ledger yet. The whale-ingest cron writes ≥ $5k trades every 10 minutes; check back after a recovery window.
Ledger intelligence
persistent7d volume
$0.00
0 trades
30d volume
$0.00
0 trades
Buy share
50%
Sample
low
0 ledger trades
No persistent whale trades for this wallet yet. The live Data API score above can still be useful, but the durable ledger sample is empty.
Profile dimensions
Trade count + how recently they were active. Low = dormant.
How trustworthy the win-rate number is, based on sample size of closed markets.
Share of trades concentrated in their top category.
Share of positions taken while the market was still uncertain (30–70¢) rather than after direction was obvious.
How risky to blindly copy. Higher = riskier — large size, single-position exposure, or thin win-rate sample.
- Trades (all time)
- 4
- Avg trade size
- $186.55
- Top category
- —
- Category concentration
- 0%
- First seen
- Apr 16, 12:53 UTC
- Last active
- Apr 27, 21:51 UTC
- Win rate sample
- 0 closed
The single Activity score is kept for the leaderboard sort. The five dimensions above are the canonical read — copy-risk bar is inverted so green is always "better for the user".