Wooden-Hop
0xd8bb971bc95e16308f19d0eacba67106ede050eb
Wallet digest
Activity score
42/100
Performance: thin sample
Open positions
1
Open notional
$0.00
Total PnL
$-3.6K
Realised
$0.00
Win rate
n/a
too few closed
Recent activity
- REDEEMEthereum Up or Down - October 20, 10:30PM-10:45PM ET$500.00Oct 21, 03:05 UTC
- REDEEMEthereum Up or Down - October 20, 10:45PM-11:00PM ET$7.8KOct 21, 03:05 UTC
- SPLITEthereum Up or Down - October 20, 10:30PM-10:45PM ET$500.00Oct 21, 02:32 UTC
- TRADEBUYBitcoin Up or Down - October 20, 10:45PM-11:00PM ET$3.6KOct 21, 02:29 UTC
- TRADEBUYEthereum Up or Down - October 20, 10:45PM-11:00PM ET$747.50Oct 21, 02:29 UTC
- TRADEBUYEthereum Up or Down - October 20, 10:45PM-11:00PM ET$250.00Oct 21, 02:28 UTC
- TRADEBUYEthereum Up or Down - October 20, 10:45PM-11:00PM ET$2.9KOct 21, 02:28 UTC
Persistent ledger timeline
persistentNo trades for this wallet in Orrery's persistent ledger yet. The whale-ingest cron writes ≥ $5k trades every 10 minutes; check back after a recovery window.
Ledger intelligence
persistent7d volume
$0.00
0 trades
30d volume
$0.00
0 trades
Buy share
50%
Sample
low
0 ledger trades
No persistent whale trades for this wallet yet. The live Data API score above can still be useful, but the durable ledger sample is empty.
Profile dimensions
Trade count + how recently they were active. Low = dormant.
How trustworthy the win-rate number is, based on sample size of closed markets.
Share of trades concentrated in their top category.
Share of positions taken while the market was still uncertain (30–70¢) rather than after direction was obvious.
How risky to blindly copy. Higher = riskier — large size, single-position exposure, or thin win-rate sample.
- Trades (all time)
- 4
- Avg trade size
- $1.9K
- Top category
- —
- Category concentration
- 0%
- First seen
- Oct 21, 02:28 UTC
- Last active
- Oct 21, 03:05 UTC
- Win rate sample
- 0 closed
The single Activity score is kept for the leaderboard sort. The five dimensions above are the canonical read — copy-risk bar is inverted so green is always "better for the user".