Defenseless-Divider
0xd8f351c0c44c246e2ba70278f476980e43d0e577
Wallet digest
Activity score
64/100
Performance: thin sample
Open positions
7
Open notional
$22.64
Total PnL
$-7.98
Realised
$-0.34
Win rate
n/a
too few closed
Largest open positions
- YES
Will New York Times (NYT) beat quarterly earnings?
11 shares @ 97.0¢·now 100.0¢·exp Nov 5, 2025$11.34
$0.34
- NO
Will Johnnie Vibes win the 2025 National Heads-Up Poker Championship?
8 shares @ 99.9¢·now 100.0¢·exp Dec 31, 2025$8.13
$0.01
- YES
Will DraftKings say "Prediction" during earnings call?
2 shares @ 99.1¢·now 100.0¢·exp Nov 7, 2025$2.02
$0.02
- NO
Will Stephen Chidwick win the 2025 National Heads-Up Poker Championship?
1 shares @ 99.9¢·now 100.0¢·exp Dec 31, 2025$1.16
$0.00
- YES
Will Chino Rheem win the 2025 National Heads-Up Poker Championship?
4000 shares @ 0.1¢·now 0.0¢·exp Dec 31, 2025$0.00
$-4.00
- NO
Israel military action against Iran before July?
3 shares @ 61.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Jun 30, 2025$0.00
$-2.00
- LAZIO
UEFA Europa League: Lazio vs. Bodø/Glimt (To Advance)
2 shares @ 85.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Apr 10, 2025$0.00
$-2.00
Recent activity
- TRADESELLWill Johnnie Vibes win the 2025 National Heads-Up Poker Championship?$319.68Nov 5, 09:01 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill New York Times (NYT) beat quarterly earnings?$11.00Nov 4, 13:21 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill DraftKings say "Prediction" during earnings call?$2.00Nov 4, 13:20 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Johnnie Vibes win the 2025 National Heads-Up Poker Championship?$327.80Nov 4, 13:19 UTC
- TRADESELLWill Stephen Chidwick win the 2025 National Heads-Up Poker Championship?$344.00Nov 4, 13:18 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Stephen Chidwick win the 2025 National Heads-Up Poker Championship?$345.50Nov 4, 13:18 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Chino Rheem win the 2025 National Heads-Up Poker Championship?$4.00Nov 4, 13:17 UTC
- TRADESELLWill Apple release a foldable iPhone in 2025?$1.11Nov 4, 13:16 UTC
- REDEEMWill Trump announce Kevin Warsh as next Fed Chair?$2.13Nov 4, 13:15 UTC
- REDEEMIsrael retaliates against Houthis before May?$2.41Nov 4, 13:15 UTC
- TRADEBUYUEFA Europa League: Lazio vs. Bodø/Glimt (To Advance)$2.00Apr 1, 13:36 UTC
- TRADEBUYIsrael military action against Iran before July?$2.00Apr 1, 13:36 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Apple release a foldable iPhone in 2025?$1.00Apr 1, 13:35 UTC
- TRADEBUYIsrael retaliates against Houthis before May?$2.00Apr 1, 13:35 UTC
- TRADESELLWill LaMelo Ball lead the NBA in Assists?$1.00Apr 1, 13:35 UTC
- REDEEMWill Trump's 2025 joint address get 34-38m viewers?$0.00Apr 1, 13:34 UTC
- REDEEMWill John Fetterman applaud during Trump's address to Congress?$2.02Apr 1, 13:34 UTC
- REDEEMWill Ilhan Omar applaud during Trump's address to Congress?$2.04Apr 1, 13:34 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Trump's 2025 joint address get 34-38m viewers?$1.00Mar 5, 09:51 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Ilhan Omar applaud during Trump's address to Congress?$2.00Mar 5, 09:51 UTC
Persistent ledger timeline
persistentNo trades for this wallet in Orrery's persistent ledger yet. The whale-ingest cron writes ≥ $5k trades every 10 minutes; check back after a recovery window.
Ledger intelligence
persistent7d volume
$0.00
0 trades
30d volume
$0.00
0 trades
Buy share
50%
Sample
low
0 ledger trades
No persistent whale trades for this wallet yet. The live Data API score above can still be useful, but the durable ledger sample is empty.
Profile dimensions
Trade count + how recently they were active. Low = dormant.
How trustworthy the win-rate number is, based on sample size of closed markets.
Share of trades concentrated in their top category.
Share of positions taken while the market was still uncertain (30–70¢) rather than after direction was obvious.
How risky to blindly copy. Higher = riskier — large size, single-position exposure, or thin win-rate sample.
- Trades (all time)
- 37
- Avg trade size
- $37.74
- Top category
- —
- Category concentration
- 0%
- First seen
- Dec 20, 12:28 UTC
- Last active
- Nov 5, 09:01 UTC
- Win rate sample
- 1 closed
The single Activity score is kept for the leaderboard sort. The five dimensions above are the canonical read — copy-risk bar is inverted so green is always "better for the user".