Mindless-Basics
0xd9f0faa79023189b5eae824def66e4889326e0a7
Wallet digest
Activity score
50/100
Performance: thin sample
Open positions
14
Open notional
$0.00
Total PnL
$-4.2K
Realised
$0.00
Win rate
n/a
too few closed
Largest open positions
showing 10 of 14- OVER
CD Tondela vs. Sport Lisboa e Benfica: O/U 3.5
1467 shares @ 34.1¢·now 0.0¢·exp Feb 1, 2026$0.00
$-500.00
- UNDER
Heracles Almelo vs. Fortuna Sittard: O/U 2.5
988 shares @ 50.6¢·now 0.0¢·exp Feb 1, 2026$0.00
$-500.00
- UNDER
Gil Vicente FC vs. FC Famalicão: O/U 2.5
821 shares @ 60.9¢·now 0.0¢·exp Feb 1, 2026$0.00
$-500.00
- OVER
SD Huesca vs. Cádiz CF: O/U 1.5
761 shares @ 65.7¢·now 0.0¢·exp Feb 1, 2026$0.00
$-500.00
- UNDER
RCD Mallorca vs. Sevilla FC: O/U 2.5
658 shares @ 60.8¢·now 0.0¢·exp Feb 2, 2026$0.00
$-400.00
- NO
Will RCD Mallorca win on 2026-02-02?
615 shares @ 65.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Feb 2, 2026$0.00
$-400.00
- OVER
Manchester United FC vs. Tottenham Hotspur FC: O/U 2.5
517 shares @ 65.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Feb 7, 2026$0.00
$-335.96
- UNDER
Fortuna Sittard vs. Sparta Rotterdam: O/U 3.5
403 shares @ 71.9¢·now 0.0¢·exp Feb 7, 2026$0.00
$-290.00
- BOLOGNA FC 1909
Spread: AC Milan (-1.5)
357 shares @ 84.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Feb 3, 2026$0.00
$-300.00
- YES
Will Bologna FC 1909 vs. AC Milan end in a draw?
323 shares @ 31.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Feb 3, 2026$0.00
$-100.00
Recent activity
- REDEEMRayo Vallecano de Madrid vs. Real Oviedo: O/U 3.5$399.99Jun 3, 07:42 UTC
- TRADEBUYRayo Vallecano de Madrid vs. Real Oviedo: O/U 3.5$2.00Feb 14, 17:55 UTC
- TRADEBUYRayo Vallecano de Madrid vs. Real Oviedo: O/U 3.5$184.33Feb 10, 21:53 UTC
- REDEEMAS Roma vs. Cagliari Calcio: O/U 2.5$1.1KFeb 10, 12:42 UTC
- TRADEBUYRayo Vallecano de Madrid vs. Real Oviedo: O/U 3.5$19.99Feb 9, 22:13 UTC
- TRADEBUYAS Roma vs. Cagliari Calcio: O/U 2.5$600.00Feb 9, 13:08 UTC
- REDEEMFC Bayern München vs. TSG 1899 Hoffenheim: O/U 4.5$0.00Feb 9, 07:51 UTC
- REDEEMWill US Lecce vs. Udinese Calcio end in a draw?$0.00Feb 9, 07:51 UTC
- REDEEMWill Toulouse FC win on 2026-02-08?$0.00Feb 9, 07:51 UTC
- REDEEMFC Bayern München vs. TSG 1899 Hoffenheim: O/U 4.5$0.00Feb 9, 07:51 UTC
- REDEEMFC Bayern München vs. TSG 1899 Hoffenheim: O/U 4.5$0.00Feb 9, 07:51 UTC
- REDEEMWill US Lecce win on 2026-02-08?$100.00Feb 9, 07:49 UTC
- REDEEMClub Atlético de Madrid vs. Real Betis Balompié: O/U 3.5$300.00Feb 9, 07:49 UTC
- REDEEMDeportivo Alavés vs. Getafe CF: O/U 2.5$394.74Feb 9, 07:49 UTC
- REDEEMLiverpool FC vs. Manchester City FC: O/U 1.5$714.29Feb 9, 07:49 UTC
- TRADEBUYRayo Vallecano de Madrid vs. Real Oviedo: O/U 3.5$4.14Feb 8, 21:47 UTC
- TRADEBUYRayo Vallecano de Madrid vs. Real Oviedo: O/U 3.5$100.00Feb 8, 13:17 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Cádiz CF win on 2026-02-07?$100.00Feb 8, 12:38 UTC
- TRADEBUYLiverpool FC vs. Manchester City FC: O/U 1.5$600.00Feb 8, 12:34 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill US Lecce vs. Udinese Calcio end in a draw?$34.00Feb 8, 12:32 UTC
Persistent ledger timeline
persistentNo trades for this wallet in Orrery's persistent ledger yet. The whale-ingest cron writes ≥ $5k trades every 10 minutes; check back after a recovery window.
Ledger intelligence
persistent7d volume
$0.00
0 trades
30d volume
$0.00
0 trades
Buy share
50%
Sample
low
0 ledger trades
No persistent whale trades for this wallet yet. The live Data API score above can still be useful, but the durable ledger sample is empty.
Profile dimensions
Trade count + how recently they were active. Low = dormant.
How trustworthy the win-rate number is, based on sample size of closed markets.
Share of trades concentrated in their top category.
Share of positions taken while the market was still uncertain (30–70¢) rather than after direction was obvious.
How risky to blindly copy. Higher = riskier — large size, single-position exposure, or thin win-rate sample.
- Trades (all time)
- 34
- Avg trade size
- $222.28
- Top category
- —
- Category concentration
- 0%
- First seen
- Feb 7, 12:09 UTC
- Last active
- Jun 3, 07:42 UTC
- Win rate sample
- 1 closed
The single Activity score is kept for the leaderboard sort. The five dimensions above are the canonical read — copy-risk bar is inverted so green is always "better for the user".