Naive-Cone
0xdb0df0e49f9e927d62fa9b5b431539cda5241d6d
Wallet digest
Activity score
88/100
Performance measurable
Open positions
175
Open notional
$3.8K
Total PnL
$-2.8K
Realised
$2.4K
Win rate
83%
36 closed
Largest open positions
showing 10 of 175- CTBC FLYING OYSTER
LoL: GAM Esports vs CTBC Flying Oyster (BO3) - LCP Regular Season
10000 shares @ 1.0¢·now 8.0¢·exp May 17, 2026$800.00
$700.00
- NO
Will Odense BK win on 2026-05-17?
250 shares @ 42.0¢·now 100.0¢·exp May 17, 2026$249.88
$144.88
- YES
Will Feyenoord Rotterdam win on 2026-05-17?
200 shares @ 61.0¢·now 100.0¢·exp May 17, 2026$199.90
$77.90
- YES
Will FC Fredericia win on 2026-05-17?
200 shares @ 51.0¢·now 100.0¢·exp May 17, 2026$199.90
$97.90
- NO
Will AFC Ajax win on 2026-05-17?
200 shares @ 60.0¢·now 100.0¢·exp May 17, 2026$199.90
$79.90
- YES
Will AC Milan win on 2026-05-17?
200 shares @ 58.0¢·now 100.0¢·exp May 17, 2026$199.90
$83.90
- YES
Will LASK Linz win on 2026-05-17?
200 shares @ 45.0¢·now 99.5¢·exp May 17, 2026$198.90
$108.90
- YES
Will SK Sturm Graz win on 2026-05-17?
200 shares @ 47.0¢·now 99.5¢·exp May 17, 2026$198.59
$104.73
- YES
Will SpVgg Greuther Fürth win on 2026-05-17?
200 shares @ 47.0¢·now 98.2¢·exp May 17, 2026$196.30
$102.30
- NO
Will Brentford FC win on 2026-05-17?
250 shares @ 44.0¢·now 72.5¢·exp May 17, 2026$181.25
$71.25
Recent activity
- TRADEBUYLoL: GAM Esports vs CTBC Flying Oyster (BO3) - LCP Regular Season$50.00May 17, 14:29 UTC
- TRADEBUYLoL: GAM Esports vs CTBC Flying Oyster (BO3) - LCP Regular Season$50.00May 17, 14:29 UTC
- TRADEBUYLoL: Bilibili Gaming vs Anyone's Legend - Game 2 Winner$32.63May 17, 14:04 UTC
- TRADEBUYLoL: Bilibili Gaming vs Anyone's Legend - Game 2 Winner$7.49May 17, 14:04 UTC
- TRADEBUYLoL: Bilibili Gaming vs Anyone's Legend - Game 2 Winner$0.76May 17, 14:04 UTC
- TRADEBUYLoL: Bilibili Gaming vs Anyone's Legend - Game 2 Winner$1.21May 17, 14:03 UTC
- TRADEBUYLoL: Bilibili Gaming vs Anyone's Legend - Game 2 Winner$0.03May 17, 14:02 UTC
- TRADEBUYLoL: Bilibili Gaming vs Anyone's Legend - Game 2 Winner$3.00May 17, 14:02 UTC
- TRADEBUYLoL: Bilibili Gaming vs Anyone's Legend - Game 2 Winner$0.04May 17, 14:02 UTC
- TRADEBUYLoL: Bilibili Gaming vs Anyone's Legend - Game 2 Winner$0.24May 17, 14:02 UTC
- TRADEBUYLoL: Bilibili Gaming vs Anyone's Legend - Game 2 Winner$3.40May 17, 14:02 UTC
- TRADEBUYLoL: Bilibili Gaming vs Anyone's Legend - Game 2 Winner$1.21May 17, 14:01 UTC
- TRADESELLLoL: Bilibili Gaming vs Anyone's Legend - Game 1 Winner$3.89May 17, 13:51 UTC
- TRADESELLLoL: Bilibili Gaming vs Anyone's Legend - Game 1 Winner$0.01May 17, 13:49 UTC
- TRADESELLLoL: Bilibili Gaming vs Anyone's Legend - Game 1 Winner$0.00May 17, 13:48 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill DSC Arminia Bielefeld win on 2026-05-17?$72.00May 17, 13:47 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill DSC Arminia Bielefeld win on 2026-05-17?$18.00May 17, 13:47 UTC
- TRADESELLLoL: Bilibili Gaming vs Anyone's Legend - Game 1 Winner$0.04May 17, 13:45 UTC
- TRADESELLLoL: Bilibili Gaming vs Anyone's Legend - Game 1 Winner$0.04May 17, 13:44 UTC
- TRADESELLLoL: Bilibili Gaming vs Anyone's Legend - Game 1 Winner$0.07May 17, 13:44 UTC
Persistent ledger timeline
persistentNo trades for this wallet in Orrery's persistent ledger yet. The whale-ingest cron writes ≥ $5k trades every 10 minutes; check back after a recovery window.
Profile dimensions
Trade count + how recently they were active. Low = dormant.
How trustworthy the win-rate number is, based on sample size of closed markets.
Share of trades concentrated in their top category.
Share of positions taken while the market was still uncertain (30–70¢) rather than after direction was obvious.
How risky to blindly copy. Higher = riskier — large size, single-position exposure, or thin win-rate sample.
- Trades (all time)
- 50
- Avg trade size
- $44.36
- Top category
- —
- Category concentration
- 0%
- First seen
- May 17, 13:04 UTC
- Last active
- May 17, 14:29 UTC
- Win rate sample
- 36 closed
The single Activity score is kept for the leaderboard sort. The five dimensions above are the canonical read — copy-risk bar is inverted so green is always "better for the user".