Kindly-Reveal
0xdb54281bf845c6aba9706577be59eae1bc2fed71
Wallet digest
Activity score
50/100
Performance: thin sample
Open positions
12
Open notional
$0.00
Total PnL
$-2.3K
Realised
$0.00
Win rate
n/a
too few closed
Largest open positions
showing 10 of 12- TEAM WE
LoL: Team WE vs EDward Gaming - Game 2 Winner
700 shares @ 62.9¢·now 0.0¢·exp Dec 24, 2025$0.00
$-440.70
- TEAM WE
LoL: Invictus Gaming vs Team WE - Game 2 Winner
595 shares @ 47.3¢·now 0.0¢·exp Dec 23, 2025$0.00
$-281.65
- ROCKETS
Rockets vs. Kings
533 shares @ 56.5¢·now 0.0¢·exp Dec 22, 2025$0.00
$-300.83
- CAVALIERS
Cavaliers vs. Knicks
482 shares @ 87.6¢·now 0.0¢·exp Dec 25, 2025$0.00
$-422.56
- OVER
Celtics vs. Raptors: O/U 220.5
451 shares @ 88.8¢·now 0.0¢·exp Dec 21, 2025$0.00
$-400.00
- OH MY GOD
LoL: Oh My God vs JD Gaming - Game 1 Winner
400 shares @ 53.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Dec 22, 2025$0.00
$-212.00
- OVER
Grizzlies vs. Clippers: O/U 226.5
208 shares @ 48.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Dec 16, 2025$0.00
$-100.00
- BILIBILI GAMING
LoL: Bilibili Gaming vs Oh My God - Game 1 Winner
182 shares @ 54.8¢·now 0.0¢·exp Dec 23, 2025$0.00
$-100.00
- EDWARD GAMING
LoL: JD Gaming vs EDward Gaming - Game 3 Winner
59 shares @ 17.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Dec 27, 2025$0.00
$-10.00
- LGD GAMING
LoL: LGD Gaming vs EDward Gaming (BO3)
37 shares @ 54.2¢·now 0.0¢·exp Dec 21, 2025$0.00
$-20.00
Recent activity
- TRADEBUYLoL: JD Gaming vs EDward Gaming - Game 3 Winner$10.00Dec 27, 11:39 UTC
- TRADEBUYCavaliers vs. Knicks$44.02Dec 25, 19:20 UTC
- TRADEBUYCavaliers vs. Knicks$343.20Dec 25, 19:11 UTC
- TRADEBUYCavaliers vs. Knicks$35.34Dec 25, 19:05 UTC
- TRADEBUYCavaliers vs. Knicks: 1H Moneyline$13.58Dec 25, 17:39 UTC
- TRADESELLLoL: JD Gaming vs Bilibili Gaming - Game 2 Winner$399.60Dec 24, 13:32 UTC
- TRADEBUYLoL: JD Gaming vs Bilibili Gaming - Game 2 Winner$396.00Dec 24, 13:21 UTC
- TRADESELLLoL: JD Gaming vs Bilibili Gaming - Game 1 Winner$399.60Dec 24, 12:53 UTC
- TRADEBUYLoL: JD Gaming vs Bilibili Gaming - Game 1 Winner$176.00Dec 24, 12:33 UTC
- TRADEBUYLoL: JD Gaming vs Bilibili Gaming - Game 1 Winner$178.00Dec 24, 12:33 UTC
- TRADEBUYLoL: Team WE vs EDward Gaming - Game 2 Winner$281.14Dec 24, 11:15 UTC
- TRADEBUYLoL: Team WE vs EDward Gaming - Game 2 Winner$26.57Dec 24, 11:14 UTC
- TRADEBUYLoL: Team WE vs EDward Gaming - Game 2 Winner$18.69Dec 24, 11:14 UTC
- TRADEBUYLoL: Team WE vs EDward Gaming - Game 2 Winner$114.30Dec 24, 11:14 UTC
- TRADESELLLoL: Oh My God vs LNG Esports (BO3)$799.20Dec 24, 09:51 UTC
- TRADESELLLoL: Oh My God vs LNG Esports - Game 1 Winner$9.99Dec 24, 09:39 UTC
- TRADEBUYLoL: Oh My God vs LNG Esports (BO3)$196.00Dec 24, 09:38 UTC
- TRADEBUYLoL: Oh My God vs LNG Esports (BO3)$420.00Dec 24, 09:34 UTC
- TRADEBUYLoL: Oh My God vs LNG Esports - Game 1 Winner$5.00Dec 24, 07:28 UTC
- TRADEBUYLoL: Bilibili Gaming vs Oh My God - Game 1 Winner$100.00Dec 23, 09:21 UTC
Persistent ledger timeline
persistentNo trades for this wallet in Orrery's persistent ledger yet. The whale-ingest cron writes ≥ $5k trades every 10 minutes; check back after a recovery window.
Ledger intelligence
persistent7d volume
$0.00
0 trades
30d volume
$0.00
0 trades
Buy share
50%
Sample
low
0 ledger trades
No persistent whale trades for this wallet yet. The live Data API score above can still be useful, but the durable ledger sample is empty.
Profile dimensions
Trade count + how recently they were active. Low = dormant.
How trustworthy the win-rate number is, based on sample size of closed markets.
Share of trades concentrated in their top category.
Share of positions taken while the market was still uncertain (30–70¢) rather than after direction was obvious.
How risky to blindly copy. Higher = riskier — large size, single-position exposure, or thin win-rate sample.
- Trades (all time)
- 49
- Avg trade size
- $160.26
- Top category
- —
- Category concentration
- 0%
- First seen
- Dec 16, 05:53 UTC
- Last active
- Dec 27, 11:39 UTC
- Win rate sample
- 0 closed
The single Activity score is kept for the leaderboard sort. The five dimensions above are the canonical read — copy-risk bar is inverted so green is always "better for the user".