Revolving-Vinyl-Average
0xde0f5594d2867335c5d1d8d8578ec33f5f4dddd3
Wallet digest
Activity score
83/100
Performance: thin sample
Open positions
7
Open notional
$1.0K
Total PnL
$-117.92
Realised
$0.00
Win rate
n/a
too few closed
Largest open positions
- NO
Chongqing Tonglianglong FC vs. Yunnan Yukun FC: Both Teams to Score
516 shares @ 76.7¢·now 100.0¢·exp May 20, 2026$515.97
$119.77
- YES
Will Chongqing Tonglianglong FC vs. Yunnan Yukun FC end in a draw?
500 shares @ 52.0¢·now 100.0¢·exp May 20, 2026$499.75
$239.75
- NO
Liaoning Tieren FC vs. Qingdao Hainiu FC: Both Teams to Score
500 shares @ 48.0¢·now 0.1¢·exp May 20, 2026$0.25
$-239.75
- YES
Liaoning Tieren FC vs. Qingdao Hainiu FC: Draw at halftime?
213 shares @ 45.9¢·now 0.1¢·exp May 20, 2026$0.11
$-97.49
- YES
Will Liaoning Tieren FC vs. Qingdao Hainiu FC end in a draw?
200 shares @ 43.0¢·now 0.1¢·exp May 20, 2026$0.10
$-85.90
- OVER
Chelsea FC vs. Tottenham Hotspur FC: O/U 3.5
180 shares @ 29.6¢·now 0.0¢·exp May 19, 2026$0.00
$-53.30
- YES
Manchester City FC leading at halftime?
2 shares @ 42.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp May 19, 2026$0.00
$-1.00
Recent activity
- TRADEBUYWill Chongqing Tonglianglong FC vs. Yunnan Yukun FC end in a draw?$43.33May 20, 13:27 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Chongqing Tonglianglong FC vs. Yunnan Yukun FC end in a draw?$216.67May 20, 13:27 UTC
- TRADEBUYChongqing Tonglianglong FC vs. Yunnan Yukun FC: Both Teams to Score$387.66May 20, 13:14 UTC
- TRADEBUYChongqing Tonglianglong FC vs. Yunnan Yukun FC: Both Teams to Score$2.23May 20, 13:06 UTC
- TRADEBUYChongqing Tonglianglong FC vs. Yunnan Yukun FC: Both Teams to Score$9.05May 20, 13:05 UTC
- TRADESELLZhejiang Zhiye FC vs. Shandong Taishan FC: Both Teams to Score$102.02May 20, 12:51 UTC
- TRADESELLLiaoning Tieren FC vs. Qingdao Hainiu FC: O/U 1.5$126.45May 20, 12:37 UTC
- TRADESELLLiaoning Tieren FC vs. Qingdao Hainiu FC: Both Teams to Score$130.33May 20, 12:36 UTC
- TRADESELLShanghai Shenhua FC vs. Wuhan San Zhen FC: O/U 1.5$230.63May 20, 12:34 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Liaoning Tieren FC vs. Qingdao Hainiu FC end in a draw?$87.47May 20, 12:24 UTC
- TRADESELLZhejiang Zhiye FC vs. Shandong Taishan FC: O/U 1.5$224.98May 20, 12:03 UTC
- TRADEBUYLiaoning Tieren FC vs. Qingdao Hainiu FC: Both Teams to Score$243.74May 20, 11:43 UTC
- TRADEBUYLiaoning Tieren FC vs. Qingdao Hainiu FC: Draw at halftime?$93.49May 20, 11:11 UTC
- TRADEBUYLiaoning Tieren FC vs. Qingdao Hainiu FC: Draw at halftime?$5.69May 20, 11:07 UTC
- TRADEBUYLiaoning Tieren FC vs. Qingdao Hainiu FC: Both Teams to Score$76.62May 20, 10:43 UTC
- TRADEBUYLiaoning Tieren FC vs. Qingdao Hainiu FC: O/U 1.5$100.63May 20, 10:32 UTC
- TRADEBUYShanghai Shenhua FC vs. Wuhan San Zhen FC: O/U 1.5$200.84May 20, 10:25 UTC
- TRADEBUYZhejiang Zhiye FC vs. Shandong Taishan FC: Both Teams to Score$100.99May 20, 10:24 UTC
- TRADEBUYZhejiang Zhiye FC vs. Shandong Taishan FC: O/U 1.5$200.88May 20, 10:23 UTC
- TRADEBUYChelsea FC vs. Tottenham Hotspur FC: O/U 3.5$12.27May 19, 21:03 UTC
Persistent ledger timeline
persistentNo trades for this wallet in Orrery's persistent ledger yet. The whale-ingest cron writes ≥ $5k trades every 10 minutes; check back after a recovery window.
Ledger intelligence
persistent7d volume
$0.00
0 trades
30d volume
$0.00
0 trades
Buy share
50%
Sample
low
0 ledger trades
No persistent whale trades for this wallet yet. The live Data API score above can still be useful, but the durable ledger sample is empty.
Profile dimensions
Trade count + how recently they were active. Low = dormant.
How trustworthy the win-rate number is, based on sample size of closed markets.
Share of trades concentrated in their top category.
Share of positions taken while the market was still uncertain (30–70¢) rather than after direction was obvious.
How risky to blindly copy. Higher = riskier — large size, single-position exposure, or thin win-rate sample.
- Trades (all time)
- 38
- Avg trade size
- $73.84
- Top category
- —
- Category concentration
- 0%
- First seen
- May 19, 18:47 UTC
- Last active
- May 20, 13:27 UTC
- Win rate sample
- 0 closed
The single Activity score is kept for the leaderboard sort. The five dimensions above are the canonical read — copy-risk bar is inverted so green is always "better for the user".