Pink-Menu
0xde8b83774b0b82e238e5285aeaba65b7a513fdb0
Wallet digest
Activity score
50/100
Performance: thin sample
Open positions
11
Open notional
$0.00
Total PnL
$-3.9K
Realised
$70.18
Win rate
n/a
too few closed
Largest open positions
showing 10 of 11- YES
Will the Champions League Final be decided in a penalty shoot-out?
2191 shares @ 15.5¢·now 0.0¢·exp May 31, 2025$0.00
$-339.00
- RAFAEL JODAR
Miami Open: Rafael Jodar vs Tomas Etcheverry
1784 shares @ 60.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Mar 29, 2026$0.00
$-1.1K
- OVER
Brighton & Hove Albion FC vs. Liverpool FC: O/U 3.5
910 shares @ 69.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Mar 21, 2026$0.00
$-628.18
- YES
Will KT Rolster win LoL Worlds 2025?
904 shares @ 42.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Nov 9, 2025$0.00
$-380.00
- UNDER
AS Monaco FC vs. Stade Rennais FC 1901: O/U 2.5
851 shares @ 42.9¢·now 0.0¢·exp Jan 31, 2026$0.00
$-365.05
- UNDER
Chelsea FC vs. West Ham United FC: O/U 3.5
590 shares @ 60.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Jan 31, 2026$0.00
$-354.19
- LIVERPOOL
Spread: Manchester City (-0.5)
580 shares @ 51.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Nov 9, 2025$0.00
$-295.80
- YES
Will Liverpool FC win on 2026-04-14?
491 shares @ 41.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Apr 14, 2026$0.00
$-201.37
- YES
Will Manchester City vs. Liverpool end in a draw?
400 shares @ 25.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Nov 9, 2025$0.00
$-100.00
- YES
Will Liverpool FC win on 2026-02-08?
399 shares @ 47.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Feb 8, 2026$0.00
$-187.72
Recent activity
- TRADEBUYWill Liverpool FC win on 2026-04-14?$205.00Apr 14, 18:29 UTC
- TRADEBUYMiami Open: Rafael Jodar vs Tomas Etcheverry$1.1KMar 22, 18:48 UTC
- TRADEBUYMiami Open: Rafael Jodar vs Tomas Etcheverry$6.00Mar 22, 18:48 UTC
- TRADESELLMiami Open: Rafael Jodar vs Tomas Etcheverry$1.0KMar 22, 18:38 UTC
- TRADESELLMiami Open: Rafael Jodar vs Tomas Etcheverry$18.00Mar 22, 18:38 UTC
- TRADESELLMiami Open: Rafael Jodar vs Tomas Etcheverry$1.83Mar 22, 18:38 UTC
- TRADESELLMiami Open: Rafael Jodar vs Tomas Etcheverry$21.29Mar 22, 18:38 UTC
- TRADEBUYMiami Open: Rafael Jodar vs Tomas Etcheverry$982.45Mar 22, 18:35 UTC
- TRADESELLLoL: Gen.G vs G2 Esports (BO5) - First Stand Playoffs$652.28Mar 21, 15:09 UTC
- TRADEBUYLoL: Gen.G vs G2 Esports (BO5) - First Stand Playoffs$999.38Mar 21, 14:57 UTC
- TRADEBUYBrighton & Hove Albion FC vs. Liverpool FC: O/U 3.5$628.18Mar 21, 14:10 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Liverpool FC win on 2026-02-08?$0.19Feb 8, 16:29 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Liverpool FC win on 2026-02-08?$185.18Feb 8, 16:29 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Liverpool FC win on 2026-02-08?$2.35Feb 8, 16:29 UTC
- TRADEBUYPelicans vs. 76ers$34.14Jan 31, 21:34 UTC
- TRADEBUYAS Monaco FC vs. Stade Rennais FC 1901: O/U 2.5$365.05Jan 31, 20:53 UTC
- TRADEBUYChelsea FC vs. West Ham United FC: O/U 3.5$354.19Jan 31, 17:36 UTC
- TRADEBUYSpread: Manchester City (-0.5)$295.80Nov 9, 13:41 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Manchester City vs. Liverpool end in a draw?$100.00Nov 9, 13:39 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill KT Rolster win LoL Worlds 2025?$380.00Nov 9, 11:22 UTC
Persistent ledger timeline
persistentNo trades for this wallet in Orrery's persistent ledger yet. The whale-ingest cron writes ≥ $5k trades every 10 minutes; check back after a recovery window.
Ledger intelligence
persistent7d volume
$0.00
0 trades
30d volume
$0.00
0 trades
Buy share
50%
Sample
low
0 ledger trades
No persistent whale trades for this wallet yet. The live Data API score above can still be useful, but the durable ledger sample is empty.
Profile dimensions
Trade count + how recently they were active. Low = dormant.
How trustworthy the win-rate number is, based on sample size of closed markets.
Share of trades concentrated in their top category.
Share of positions taken while the market was still uncertain (30–70¢) rather than after direction was obvious.
How risky to blindly copy. Higher = riskier — large size, single-position exposure, or thin win-rate sample.
- Trades (all time)
- 46
- Avg trade size
- $249.93
- Top category
- —
- Category concentration
- 0%
- First seen
- Oct 28, 16:47 UTC
- Last active
- Apr 14, 18:29 UTC
- Win rate sample
- 1 closed
The single Activity score is kept for the leaderboard sort. The five dimensions above are the canonical read — copy-risk bar is inverted so green is always "better for the user".