0xe01c6acafc6af2ae26148d113fa10e094ca7c775
0xe01c6acafc6af2ae26148d113fa10e094ca7c775
Wallet digest
Activity score
47/100
Performance: thin sample
Open positions
4
Open notional
$1.48
Total PnL
$-48.53
Realised
$0.00
Win rate
n/a
too few closed
Largest open positions
- YES
Will Çaykur Rizespor win on 2026-05-17?
5 shares @ 30.0¢·now 29.5¢·exp May 17, 2026$1.47
$-0.03
- QINGDAO XIHAIAN FC
Spread: Qingdao Xihaian FC (-1.5)
19 shares @ 8.0¢·now 0.1¢·exp May 15, 2026$0.01
$-1.49
- NO
Will CF Pachuca win on 2026-05-14?
86 shares @ 50.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp May 15, 2026$0.00
$-43.02
- YES
Will Adelaide United FC win on 2026-05-15?
10 shares @ 42.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp May 15, 2026$0.00
$-3.99
Recent activity
- TRADEBUYWill Çaykur Rizespor win on 2026-05-17?$1.53May 15, 08:45 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Adelaide United FC win on 2026-05-15?$4.06May 15, 08:40 UTC
- REDEEMWill Pumas de la UNAM win on 2026-05-14?$6.28May 15, 06:05 UTC
- TRADEBUYSpread: Qingdao Xihaian FC (-1.5)$1.54May 15, 01:30 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill CF Pachuca win on 2026-05-14?$43.67May 15, 00:59 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Pumas de la UNAM win on 2026-05-14?$4.75May 15, 00:55 UTC
Persistent ledger timeline
persistentNo trades for this wallet in Orrery's persistent ledger yet. The whale-ingest cron writes ≥ $5k trades every 10 minutes; check back after a recovery window.
Profile dimensions
Trade count + how recently they were active. Low = dormant.
How trustworthy the win-rate number is, based on sample size of closed markets.
Share of trades concentrated in their top category.
Share of positions taken while the market was still uncertain (30–70¢) rather than after direction was obvious.
How risky to blindly copy. Higher = riskier — large size, single-position exposure, or thin win-rate sample.
- Trades (all time)
- 5
- Avg trade size
- $11.11
- Top category
- —
- Category concentration
- 0%
- First seen
- May 15, 00:55 UTC
- Last active
- May 15, 08:45 UTC
- Win rate sample
- 0 closed
The single Activity score is kept for the leaderboard sort. The five dimensions above are the canonical read — copy-risk bar is inverted so green is always "better for the user".