0xe097a178cb23f0c14b837af7e8f38b093b77b2e6
0xe097a178cb23f0c14b837af7e8f38b093b77b2e6
Wallet digest
Activity score
49/100
Performance: thin sample
Open positions
19
Open notional
$25.34
Total PnL
$-30.93
Realised
$0.00
Win rate
n/a
too few closed
Largest open positions
showing 10 of 19- DOWN
Bitcoin Up or Down - April 11, 1:40AM-1:45AM ET
19 shares @ 82.0¢·now 100.0¢·exp Apr 11, 2026$18.94
$3.42
- DOWN
Bitcoin Up or Down - April 14, 7:25PM-7:30PM ET
2 shares @ 87.0¢·now 100.0¢·exp Apr 14, 2026$2.28
$0.30
- UP
Bitcoin Up or Down - April 15, 2:35AM-2:40AM ET
2 shares @ 96.0¢·now 100.0¢·exp Apr 15, 2026$2.08
$0.08
- DOWN
Bitcoin Up or Down - April 15, 8:00AM-8:05AM ET
2 shares @ 98.0¢·now 100.0¢·exp Apr 15, 2026$2.04
$0.04
- UP
Bitcoin Up or Down - April 11, 6:25PM-6:30PM ET
13 shares @ 91.2¢·now 0.0¢·exp Apr 11, 2026$0.00
$-11.92
- UP
Bitcoin Up or Down - April 11, 8:45PM-8:50PM ET
4 shares @ 97.5¢·now 0.0¢·exp Apr 12, 2026$0.00
$-3.99
- DOWN
Bitcoin Up or Down - April 14, 3:55AM-4:00AM ET
4 shares @ 98.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Apr 14, 2026$0.00
$-3.99
- DOWN
Bitcoin Up or Down - April 11, 9:10PM-9:15PM ET
2 shares @ 89.5¢·now 0.0¢·exp Apr 12, 2026$0.00
$-1.98
- UP
Bitcoin Up or Down - April 23, 10:25AM-10:30AM ET
2 shares @ 92.5¢·now 0.0¢·exp Apr 23, 2026$0.00
$-1.99
- DOWN
Bitcoin Up or Down - April 15, 7:55PM-8:00PM ET
2 shares @ 93.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Apr 16, 2026$0.00
$-1.99
Recent activity
- REDEEMBitcoin Up or Down - May 8, 8:15AM-8:20AM ET$0.00May 8, 12:47 UTC
- REDEEMBitcoin Up or Down - May 8, 7:15AM-7:20AM ET$0.00May 8, 12:47 UTC
- REDEEMBitcoin Up or Down - May 8, 2:55AM-3:00AM ET$0.00May 8, 07:22 UTC
- REDEEMBitcoin Up or Down - May 8, 2:05AM-2:10AM ET$0.00May 8, 06:31 UTC
- REDEEMBitcoin Up or Down - May 8, 1:40AM-1:45AM ET$0.00May 8, 06:07 UTC
- REDEEMBitcoin Up or Down - May 8, 1:15AM-1:20AM ET$0.00May 8, 05:40 UTC
- REDEEMBitcoin Up or Down - May 7, 7:45PM-7:50PM ET$0.00May 8, 00:15 UTC
- REDEEMBitcoin Up or Down - May 7, 4:15PM-4:20PM ET$0.00May 7, 20:45 UTC
- REDEEMBitcoin Up or Down - May 7, 3:45PM-3:50PM ET$0.00May 7, 20:17 UTC
- REDEEMBitcoin Up or Down - May 7, 2:20PM-2:25PM ET$0.00May 7, 18:49 UTC
- REDEEMBitcoin Up or Down - May 7, 7:50AM-7:55AM ET$0.00May 7, 12:21 UTC
- REDEEMBitcoin Up or Down - May 7, 6:50AM-6:55AM ET$0.00May 7, 11:21 UTC
- REDEEMBitcoin Up or Down - May 7, 1:00AM-1:05AM ET$0.00May 7, 05:29 UTC
- REDEEMBitcoin Up or Down - May 7, 12:30AM-12:35AM ET$0.00May 7, 05:02 UTC
- REDEEMBitcoin Up or Down - May 6, 8:50PM-8:55PM ET$0.00May 7, 01:20 UTC
- REDEEMBitcoin Up or Down - May 6, 7:30PM-7:35PM ET$0.00May 6, 23:59 UTC
- REDEEMBitcoin Up or Down - May 6, 4:45PM-4:50PM ET$0.00May 6, 21:18 UTC
- REDEEMBitcoin Up or Down - May 6, 3:45PM-3:50PM ET$0.00May 6, 20:15 UTC
- REDEEMBitcoin Up or Down - May 6, 2:15PM-2:20PM ET$0.00May 6, 18:45 UTC
- REDEEMBitcoin Up or Down - May 6, 8:45AM-8:50AM ET$0.00May 6, 13:16 UTC
Persistent ledger timeline
persistentNo trades for this wallet in Orrery's persistent ledger yet. The whale-ingest cron writes ≥ $5k trades every 10 minutes; check back after a recovery window.
Ledger intelligence
persistent7d volume
$0.00
0 trades
30d volume
$0.00
0 trades
Buy share
50%
Sample
low
0 ledger trades
No persistent whale trades for this wallet yet. The live Data API score above can still be useful, but the durable ledger sample is empty.
Profile dimensions
Trade count + how recently they were active. Low = dormant.
How trustworthy the win-rate number is, based on sample size of closed markets.
Share of trades concentrated in their top category.
Share of positions taken while the market was still uncertain (30–70¢) rather than after direction was obvious.
How risky to blindly copy. Higher = riskier — large size, single-position exposure, or thin win-rate sample.
- Trades (all time)
- 0
- Avg trade size
- $0.00
- Top category
- —
- Category concentration
- 0%
- First seen
- May 3, 06:19 UTC
- Last active
- May 8, 12:47 UTC
- Win rate sample
- 0 closed
The single Activity score is kept for the leaderboard sort. The five dimensions above are the canonical read — copy-risk bar is inverted so green is always "better for the user".