Rosy-Match
0xe24f5ce00f9ebdea39a49c651a3e3526f54a0c5a
Wallet digest
Activity score
30/100
Performance measurable
Open positions
15
Open notional
$0.00
Total PnL
$-4.1K
Realised
$-201.31
Win rate
0%
3 closed
Largest open positions
showing 10 of 15- OVER
FC Machida Zelvia vs. Kawasaki Frontale: O/U 2.5
1261 shares @ 56.1¢·now 0.0¢·exp Mar 28, 2026$0.00
$-708.17
- OVER
Vietnam vs. Bangladesh: O/U 3.5
1230 shares @ 42.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Mar 26, 2026$0.00
$-516.60
- OVER
Wolverhampton Wanderers FC vs. Sunderland AFC: O/U 2.5
1217 shares @ 54.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp May 2, 2026$0.00
$-657.07
- OVER
Houston Dynamo vs. Colorado Rapids SC: O/U 1.5
1000 shares @ 39.5¢·now 0.0¢·exp May 3, 2026$0.00
$-395.00
- OVER
Tigres de la UANL vs. CD Guadalajara: O/U 4.5
939 shares @ 48.9¢·now 0.0¢·exp May 3, 2026$0.00
$-458.73
- OVER
FC Schalke 04 vs. TSV Fortuna 95 Düsseldorf: O/U 1.5
610 shares @ 43.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp May 2, 2026$0.00
$-262.48
- OVER
Al Fateh Saudi Club vs. NEOM SC: O/U 4.5
500 shares @ 25.9¢·now 0.0¢·exp May 2, 2026$0.00
$-129.54
- OVER
Paris Saint-Germain FC vs. FC Lorient: O/U 4.5
407 shares @ 39.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp May 2, 2026$0.00
$-158.86
- OVER
Atlanta United FC vs. CF Montréal: O/U 4.5
400 shares @ 54.5¢·now 0.0¢·exp May 2, 2026$0.00
$-217.98
- OVER
Colombia vs. Croatia: O/U 4.5
385 shares @ 44.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Mar 26, 2026$0.00
$-169.40
Recent activity
- MAKER_REBATE$4.94May 4, 00:45 UTC
- TRADEBUYTigres de la UANL vs. CD Guadalajara: O/U 4.5$2.30May 3, 02:47 UTC
- TRADEBUYTigres de la UANL vs. CD Guadalajara: O/U 4.5$3.69May 3, 02:47 UTC
- TRADEBUYTigres de la UANL vs. CD Guadalajara: O/U 4.5$8.65May 3, 02:46 UTC
- TRADEBUYTigres de la UANL vs. CD Guadalajara: O/U 4.5$0.38May 3, 02:45 UTC
- TRADEBUYTigres de la UANL vs. CD Guadalajara: O/U 4.5$229.81May 3, 02:45 UTC
- TRADEBUYTigres de la UANL vs. CD Guadalajara: O/U 4.5$217.32May 3, 02:45 UTC
- TRADEBUYHouston Dynamo vs. Colorado Rapids SC: O/U 1.5$129.87May 3, 02:26 UTC
- TRADEBUYHouston Dynamo vs. Colorado Rapids SC: O/U 1.5$5.85May 3, 02:26 UTC
- TRADEBUYHouston Dynamo vs. Colorado Rapids SC: O/U 1.5$1.95May 3, 02:26 UTC
- TRADEBUYHouston Dynamo vs. Colorado Rapids SC: O/U 1.5$7.80May 3, 02:26 UTC
- TRADEBUYHouston Dynamo vs. Colorado Rapids SC: O/U 1.5$33.54May 3, 02:26 UTC
- TRADEBUYHouston Dynamo vs. Colorado Rapids SC: O/U 1.5$7.80May 3, 02:26 UTC
- TRADEBUYHouston Dynamo vs. Colorado Rapids SC: O/U 1.5$1.95May 3, 02:26 UTC
- TRADEBUYHouston Dynamo vs. Colorado Rapids SC: O/U 1.5$6.24May 3, 02:26 UTC
- TRADEBUYHouston Dynamo vs. Colorado Rapids SC: O/U 1.5$136.36May 3, 02:26 UTC
- TRADEBUYHouston Dynamo vs. Colorado Rapids SC: O/U 1.5$6.00May 3, 02:26 UTC
- TRADEBUYHouston Dynamo vs. Colorado Rapids SC: O/U 1.5$2.00May 3, 02:26 UTC
- TRADEBUYHouston Dynamo vs. Colorado Rapids SC: O/U 1.5$26.04May 3, 02:25 UTC
- TRADEBUYHouston Dynamo vs. Colorado Rapids SC: O/U 1.5$2.00May 3, 02:25 UTC
Persistent ledger timeline
persistentNo trades for this wallet in Orrery's persistent ledger yet. The whale-ingest cron writes ≥ $5k trades every 10 minutes; check back after a recovery window.
Ledger intelligence
persistent7d volume
$0.00
0 trades
30d volume
$0.00
0 trades
Buy share
50%
Sample
low
0 ledger trades
No persistent whale trades for this wallet yet. The live Data API score above can still be useful, but the durable ledger sample is empty.
Profile dimensions
Trade count + how recently they were active. Low = dormant.
How trustworthy the win-rate number is, based on sample size of closed markets.
Share of trades concentrated in their top category.
Share of positions taken while the market was still uncertain (30–70¢) rather than after direction was obvious.
How risky to blindly copy. Higher = riskier — large size, single-position exposure, or thin win-rate sample.
- Trades (all time)
- 49
- Avg trade size
- $23.48
- Top category
- —
- Category concentration
- 0%
- First seen
- May 3, 02:01 UTC
- Last active
- May 4, 00:45 UTC
- Win rate sample
- 3 closed
The single Activity score is kept for the leaderboard sort. The five dimensions above are the canonical read — copy-risk bar is inverted so green is always "better for the user".