Glistening-Melody
0xe3639d46975daa546c0a272d403d6953c221c894
Wallet digest
Activity score
50/100
Performance: thin sample
Open positions
61
Open notional
$0.00
Total PnL
$-4.8K
Realised
$1.3K
Win rate
n/a
too few closed
Largest open positions
showing 10 of 61- RIDDLE
Valorant: Insomnia vs Riddle (BO3) - VCL Japan: Phase 2
2419 shares @ 38.4¢·now 0.0¢·exp Apr 9, 2026$0.00
$-928.03
- CHICAGO CUBS
Pittsburgh Pirates vs. Chicago Cubs
987 shares @ 24.7¢·now 0.0¢·exp Apr 18, 2026$0.00
$-244.18
- OVER
Arsenal FC vs. AFC Bournemouth: O/U 3.5
500 shares @ 35.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Apr 11, 2026$0.00
$-175.00
- OVER
Liverpool FC vs. Fulham FC: O/U 3.5
500 shares @ 40.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Apr 11, 2026$0.00
$-200.00
- RIDDLE
Valorant: Insomnia vs Riddle - Map 1 Winner
487 shares @ 49.9¢·now 0.0¢·exp Apr 9, 2026$0.00
$-242.79
- OVER
Clippers vs. Trail Blazers: O/U 227.5
477 shares @ 46.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Apr 11, 2026$0.00
$-219.31
- OVER
SK Brann vs. Sandefjord Fotball: O/U 3.5
380 shares @ 45.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Apr 12, 2026$0.00
$-171.19
- NO
Will Melbourne City FC win on 2026-04-04?
340 shares @ 49.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Apr 4, 2026$0.00
$-166.60
- OVER
Bulls vs. Knicks: O/U 238.5
300 shares @ 47.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Apr 3, 2026$0.00
$-141.00
- OVER
DSC Arminia Bielefeld vs. SV Darmstadt 98: O/U 3.5
300 shares @ 34.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Apr 4, 2026$0.00
$-102.00
Recent activity
- REDEEMValorant: TYLOO vs JD Gaming - Map 1 Winner$130.89Apr 14, 17:00 UTC
- REDEEMValorant: TYLOO vs JD Gaming (BO3) - VCT China Group Alpha$351.51Apr 14, 17:00 UTC
- TRADEBUYValorant: TYLOO vs JD Gaming (BO3) - VCT China Group Alpha$178.56Apr 14, 11:18 UTC
- TRADEBUYValorant: TYLOO vs JD Gaming (BO3) - VCT China Group Alpha$53.35Apr 14, 11:18 UTC
- TRADEBUYValorant: TYLOO vs JD Gaming (BO3) - VCT China Group Alpha$0.24Apr 14, 11:17 UTC
- TRADEBUYValorant: TYLOO vs JD Gaming (BO3) - VCT China Group Alpha$21.02Apr 14, 11:17 UTC
- TRADEBUYValorant: TYLOO vs JD Gaming (BO3) - VCT China Group Alpha$94.83Apr 14, 11:17 UTC
- TRADEBUYValorant: TYLOO vs JD Gaming - Map 1 Winner$18.29Apr 14, 10:16 UTC
- TRADEBUYValorant: TYLOO vs JD Gaming - Map 1 Winner$58.94Apr 14, 10:16 UTC
- REDEEMHawks vs. Heat: O/U 240.5$500.00Apr 13, 02:19 UTC
- MAKER_REBATE$4.46Apr 13, 01:00 UTC
- REDEEMWill UD Almería win on 2026-04-12?$150.00Apr 12, 23:59 UTC
- REDEEMWill Athletic Club win on 2026-04-12?$150.00Apr 12, 23:39 UTC
- REDEEMSan Francisco Giants vs. Baltimore Orioles: O/U 8.5$50.00Apr 12, 23:00 UTC
- REDEEMValorant: Bonk vs Pixel Lumina - Map 2 Winner$246.63Apr 12, 22:59 UTC
- REDEEMNew York Yankees vs. Tampa Bay Rays: O/U 7.5$500.00Apr 12, 22:59 UTC
- REDEEMWill CD Castellón win on 2026-04-12?$150.00Apr 12, 21:39 UTC
- TRADEBUYHawks vs. Heat: O/U 240.5$183.78Apr 12, 21:17 UTC
- TRADEBUYHawks vs. Heat: O/U 240.5$61.22Apr 12, 21:17 UTC
- REDEEMWill OGC Nice win on 2026-04-12?$150.00Apr 12, 20:19 UTC
Persistent ledger timeline
persistentNo trades for this wallet in Orrery's persistent ledger yet. The whale-ingest cron writes ≥ $5k trades every 10 minutes; check back after a recovery window.
Ledger intelligence
persistent7d volume
$0.00
0 trades
30d volume
$0.00
0 trades
Buy share
50%
Sample
low
0 ledger trades
No persistent whale trades for this wallet yet. The live Data API score above can still be useful, but the durable ledger sample is empty.
Profile dimensions
Trade count + how recently they were active. Low = dormant.
How trustworthy the win-rate number is, based on sample size of closed markets.
Share of trades concentrated in their top category.
Share of positions taken while the market was still uncertain (30–70¢) rather than after direction was obvious.
How risky to blindly copy. Higher = riskier — large size, single-position exposure, or thin win-rate sample.
- Trades (all time)
- 30
- Avg trade size
- $93.66
- Top category
- —
- Category concentration
- 0%
- First seen
- Apr 12, 11:10 UTC
- Last active
- Apr 14, 17:00 UTC
- Win rate sample
- 2 closed
The single Activity score is kept for the leaderboard sort. The five dimensions above are the canonical read — copy-risk bar is inverted so green is always "better for the user".