Drafty-Round
0xe43b13fdd023a043a2bb1967d06be6fc474e044b
Activity score
66/100
Performance: thin sample
Open positions
1
Open notional
$22.95
Total PnL
$-5.28
Realised
$0.00
Win rate
n/a
too few closed
Largest open positions
Recent activity
- TRADEBUYSpread: FK Dinamo Moskva (-1.5)$8.303h ago
- TRADEBUYSpread: FK Dinamo Moskva (-1.5)$5.713h ago
- TRADEBUYSpread: FK Dinamo Moskva (-1.5)$14.273h ago
- REDEEMSpread: Real Madrid CF (-2.5)$20.0117h ago
- TRADEBUYSpread: Real Madrid CF (-2.5)$9.711d ago
- TRADEBUYSpread: Real Madrid CF (-2.5)$9.711d ago
- REDEEMWill FK Sochi win on 2026-05-10?$29.001d ago
- TRADEBUYWill FK Sochi win on 2026-05-10?$9.711d ago
- TRADEBUYWill FK Sochi win on 2026-05-10?$8.741d ago
- TRADEBUYWill FK Sochi win on 2026-05-10?$9.711d ago
- REDEEMSpread: Real Betis Balompié (-2.5)$10.002d ago
- TRADEBUYSpread: Real Betis Balompié (-2.5)$9.512d ago
- TRADESELLSpread: VfL Wolfsburg (-2.5)$3.132d ago
- TRADESELLSpread: VfL Wolfsburg (-2.5)$9.992d ago
- TRADESELLSpread: VfL Wolfsburg (-2.5)$3.002d ago
- TRADESELLSpread: VfL Wolfsburg (-2.5)$9.992d ago
- TRADEBUYSpread: VfL Wolfsburg (-2.5)$9.812d ago
- TRADEBUYSpread: VfL Wolfsburg (-2.5)$9.812d ago
- TRADEBUYSpread: VfL Wolfsburg (-2.5)$5.882d ago
- TRADESELLWill VfB Stuttgart win on 2026-05-09?$5.002d ago
Profile dimensions
Trade count + how recently they were active. Low = dormant.
How trustworthy the win-rate number is, based on sample size of closed markets.
Share of trades concentrated in their top category.
Share of positions taken while the market was still uncertain (30–70¢) rather than after direction was obvious.
How risky to blindly copy. Higher = riskier — large size, single-position exposure, or thin win-rate sample.
- Trades (all time)
- 41
- Avg trade size
- $7.87
- Top category
- —
- Category concentration
- 0%
- First seen
- 7d ago
- Last active
- 3h ago
- Win rate sample
- 0 closed
The single Activity score is kept for the leaderboard sort. The five dimensions above are the canonical read — copy-risk bar is inverted so green is always "better for the user".
