Selfish-Poor
0xe45c858d2433ef50626c6cc955c1294704b142f5
Wallet digest
Activity score
65/100
Performance: thin sample
Open positions
31
Open notional
$33.29
Total PnL
$-135.84
Realised
$6.37
Win rate
n/a
too few closed
Largest open positions
showing 10 of 31- NO
US x Iran permanent peace deal by June 30, 2026?
44 shares @ 47.0¢·now 76.5¢·exp May 31, 2026$33.29
$12.84
- DOWN
Bitcoin Up or Down - March 11, 5:30AM-5:45AM ET
126 shares @ 39.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Mar 11, 2026$0.00
$-49.29
- OVER
Shenzhen Xinpengcheng FC vs. Tianjin Jinmen Hu FC: O/U 1.5
48 shares @ 21.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Mar 14, 2026$0.00
$-10.00
- DOWN
Bitcoin Up or Down - March 11, 9:15AM-9:30AM ET
47 shares @ 21.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Mar 11, 2026$0.00
$-9.93
- OVER
Al Fateh Saudi Club vs. Al Hilal Saudi Club: O/U 1.5
36 shares @ 28.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Mar 14, 2026$0.00
$-10.08
- OVER
Sunderland AFC vs. Brighton & Hove Albion FC: O/U 1.5
32 shares @ 30.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Mar 14, 2026$0.00
$-9.60
- OVER
Burnley FC vs. AFC Bournemouth: O/U 1.5
32 shares @ 30.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Mar 14, 2026$0.00
$-9.60
- OVER
Eintracht Braunschweig vs. TSV Fortuna 95 Düsseldorf: O/U 1.5
30 shares @ 33.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Mar 14, 2026$0.00
$-10.00
- KNICKS
Pacers vs. Knicks
13 shares @ 84.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Feb 11, 2026$0.00
$-11.00
- UNDER
Girona FC vs. Athletic Club: O/U 2.5
11 shares @ 9.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Mar 14, 2026$0.00
$-1.00
Recent activity
- TRADEBUYUS x Iran permanent peace deal by June 30, 2026?$20.45May 8, 05:50 UTC
- REDEEMLos Angeles FC vs. St. Louis City SC: O/U 1.5$32.00Mar 16, 10:28 UTC
- TRADEBUYLos Angeles FC vs. St. Louis City SC: O/U 1.5$8.10Mar 15, 04:02 UTC
- TRADEBUYLos Angeles FC vs. St. Louis City SC: O/U 1.5$1.50Mar 15, 03:59 UTC
- REDEEMAngers SCO vs. OGC Nice: O/U 1.5$31.99Mar 15, 03:13 UTC
- REDEEMSheffield Wednesday FC vs. Ipswich Town FC: O/U 1.5$31.99Mar 15, 03:13 UTC
- REDEEMMillwall FC vs. Blackburn Rovers FC: O/U 1.5$32.00Mar 15, 03:13 UTC
- REDEEMArsenal FC vs. Everton FC: O/U 1.5$32.00Mar 15, 03:13 UTC
- REDEEMWill Shenzhen Xinpengcheng FC win on 2026-03-14?$33.33Mar 15, 03:13 UTC
- TRADEBUYAl Fateh Saudi Club vs. Al Hilal Saudi Club: O/U 1.5$10.08Mar 14, 20:47 UTC
- TRADEBUYAngers SCO vs. OGC Nice: O/U 1.5$1.10Mar 14, 19:13 UTC
- TRADEBUYAngers SCO vs. OGC Nice: O/U 1.5$0.53Mar 14, 19:13 UTC
- TRADEBUYAngers SCO vs. OGC Nice: O/U 1.5$0.47Mar 14, 19:13 UTC
- TRADEBUYAngers SCO vs. OGC Nice: O/U 1.5$7.50Mar 14, 19:13 UTC
- TRADEBUYArsenal FC vs. Everton FC: O/U 1.5$9.60Mar 14, 18:51 UTC
- REDEEMOxford United FC vs. Charlton Athletic FC: O/U 1.5$30.30Mar 14, 18:19 UTC
- REDEEMMiddlesbrough FC vs. Bristol City FC: O/U 1.5$32.56Mar 14, 18:19 UTC
- TRADEBUYSunderland AFC vs. Brighton & Hove Albion FC: O/U 1.5$1.62Mar 14, 16:43 UTC
- TRADEBUYSunderland AFC vs. Brighton & Hove Albion FC: O/U 1.5$7.98Mar 14, 16:43 UTC
- TRADEBUYBurnley FC vs. AFC Bournemouth: O/U 1.5$4.52Mar 14, 16:23 UTC
Persistent ledger timeline
persistentNo trades for this wallet in Orrery's persistent ledger yet. The whale-ingest cron writes ≥ $5k trades every 10 minutes; check back after a recovery window.
Ledger intelligence
persistent7d volume
$0.00
0 trades
30d volume
$0.00
0 trades
Buy share
50%
Sample
low
0 ledger trades
No persistent whale trades for this wallet yet. The live Data API score above can still be useful, but the durable ledger sample is empty.
Profile dimensions
Trade count + how recently they were active. Low = dormant.
How trustworthy the win-rate number is, based on sample size of closed markets.
Share of trades concentrated in their top category.
Share of positions taken while the market was still uncertain (30–70¢) rather than after direction was obvious.
How risky to blindly copy. Higher = riskier — large size, single-position exposure, or thin win-rate sample.
- Trades (all time)
- 42
- Avg trade size
- $4.61
- Top category
- —
- Category concentration
- 0%
- First seen
- Mar 11, 14:23 UTC
- Last active
- May 8, 05:50 UTC
- Win rate sample
- 1 closed
The single Activity score is kept for the leaderboard sort. The five dimensions above are the canonical read — copy-risk bar is inverted so green is always "better for the user".