Long-Term-Kazoo
0xe62fad67b2732b7ed64717f8377faa3deea8c3da
Wallet digest
Activity score
50/100
Performance: thin sample
Open positions
23
Open notional
$0.00
Total PnL
$-178.61
Realised
$0.00
Win rate
n/a
too few closed
Largest open positions
showing 10 of 23- YES
Will Manchester City FC win on 2026-01-17?
100 shares @ 50.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Jan 17, 2026$0.00
$-50.00
- OVER
Leeds United FC vs. Fulham FC: O/U 4.5
72 shares @ 13.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Jan 17, 2026$0.00
$-9.32
- YES
Will RB Leipzig vs. FC Bayern München end in a draw?
48 shares @ 21.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Jan 17, 2026$0.00
$-10.00
- YES
Will Real Madrid CF vs. Levante UD end in a draw?
45 shares @ 11.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Jan 17, 2026$0.00
$-5.00
- YES
Will Brentford FC win on 2026-01-17?
42 shares @ 24.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Jan 17, 2026$0.00
$-10.00
- JAGUARS
Bills vs. Jaguars
39 shares @ 51.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Jan 11, 2026$0.00
$-20.00
- FC BAYERN MÜNCHEN
Spread: FC Bayern München (-2.5)
37 shares @ 41.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Jan 14, 2026$0.00
$-15.00
- YES
Will Atalanta BC win on 2026-01-16?
24 shares @ 41.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Jan 16, 2026$0.00
$-10.00
- STEELERS
Texans vs. Steelers
24 shares @ 42.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Jan 13, 2026$0.00
$-10.00
- YES
Will 1. FC Köln vs. FC Bayern München end in a draw?
22 shares @ 9.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Jan 14, 2026$0.00
$-2.00
Recent activity
- TRADEBUYLeeds United FC vs. Fulham FC: O/U 4.5$9.32Jan 17, 09:20 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Real Madrid CF vs. Levante UD end in a draw?$5.00Jan 17, 09:08 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill RB Leipzig vs. FC Bayern München end in a draw?$10.00Jan 17, 09:06 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Brentford FC win on 2026-01-17?$10.00Jan 17, 09:06 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Manchester City FC win on 2026-01-17?$50.00Jan 17, 09:06 UTC
- TRADESELLWill Bayer 04 Leverkusen win on 2026-01-13?$8.33Jan 17, 08:49 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Atalanta BC win on 2026-01-16?$10.00Jan 16, 20:30 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill RCD Espanyol de Barcelona vs. Girona FC end in a draw?$3.00Jan 16, 20:29 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Burgos CF vs. Valencia CF end in a draw?$1.00Jan 15, 13:10 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Como 1907 win on 2026-01-15?$4.69Jan 15, 13:05 UTC
- REDEEMWill SSC Napoli vs. Parma Calcio 1913 end in a draw?$11.11Jan 15, 07:51 UTC
- REDEEMSpread: BV Borussia 09 Dortmund (-1.5)$20.83Jan 15, 07:51 UTC
- REDEEMVfB Stuttgart vs. Eintracht Frankfurt: O/U 3.5$22.73Jan 15, 07:51 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill 1. FC Köln vs. FC Bayern München end in a draw?$2.00Jan 14, 21:21 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Senegal vs. Egypt end in a draw?$3.00Jan 14, 07:16 UTC
- TRADEBUYNigeria vs. Morocco: O/U 2.5$3.00Jan 14, 07:15 UTC
- TRADEBUYSpread: FC Bayern München (-2.5)$15.00Jan 14, 07:14 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill VfL Wolfsburg vs. FC St. Pauli 1910 end in a draw?$3.00Jan 14, 07:14 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill RB Leipzig vs. SC Freiburg end in a draw?$3.00Jan 14, 07:14 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill TSG 1899 Hoffenheim vs. Borussia Mönchengladbach end in a draw?$3.00Jan 14, 07:14 UTC
Persistent ledger timeline
persistentNo trades for this wallet in Orrery's persistent ledger yet. The whale-ingest cron writes ≥ $5k trades every 10 minutes; check back after a recovery window.
Ledger intelligence
persistent7d volume
$0.00
0 trades
30d volume
$0.00
0 trades
Buy share
50%
Sample
low
0 ledger trades
No persistent whale trades for this wallet yet. The live Data API score above can still be useful, but the durable ledger sample is empty.
Profile dimensions
Trade count + how recently they were active. Low = dormant.
How trustworthy the win-rate number is, based on sample size of closed markets.
Share of trades concentrated in their top category.
Share of positions taken while the market was still uncertain (30–70¢) rather than after direction was obvious.
How risky to blindly copy. Higher = riskier — large size, single-position exposure, or thin win-rate sample.
- Trades (all time)
- 32
- Avg trade size
- $9.15
- Top category
- —
- Category concentration
- 0%
- First seen
- Jan 11, 19:03 UTC
- Last active
- Jan 17, 09:20 UTC
- Win rate sample
- 0 closed
The single Activity score is kept for the leaderboard sort. The five dimensions above are the canonical read — copy-risk bar is inverted so green is always "better for the user".