Finished-Subset
0xe68a9e2f92b17992577207c77cda7119baec5a2b
Wallet digest
Activity score
50/100
Performance: thin sample
Open positions
79
Open notional
$0.00
Total PnL
$-2.6K
Realised
$18.40
Win rate
n/a
too few closed
Largest open positions
showing 10 of 79- YES
Will Sunderland AFC win on 2025-11-03?
314 shares @ 31.8¢·now 0.0¢·exp Nov 3, 2025$0.00
$-100.00
- MOUZ
Counter-Strike: MOUZ vs FaZe - Map 1 Winner
297 shares @ 35.4¢·now 0.0¢·exp Dec 12, 2025$0.00
$-105.00
- YES
Will FC Barcelona win on 2025-11-25?
250 shares @ 26.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Nov 25, 2025$0.00
$-65.00
- YES
Will Liverpool win on 2025-10-25?
246 shares @ 48.9¢·now 0.0¢·exp Oct 25, 2025$0.00
$-120.00
- YES
Will Manchester City win on 2025-10-26?
245 shares @ 42.9¢·now 0.0¢·exp Oct 26, 2025$0.00
$-105.00
- YES
Will Real Madrid CF win on 2025-11-04?
237 shares @ 38.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Nov 4, 2025$0.00
$-90.00
- YES
Will Inter Miami CF win on 2025-11-01?
227 shares @ 44.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Nov 1, 2025$0.00
$-100.00
- YES
Will Barcelona win on 2025-10-26?
222 shares @ 13.5¢·now 0.0¢·exp Oct 26, 2025$0.00
$-30.00
- YES
Will SSC Napoli win on 2025-12-10?
175 shares @ 22.6¢·now 0.0¢·exp Dec 10, 2025$0.00
$-39.56
- AURORA GAMING
Counter-Strike: Natus Vincere vs Aurora Gaming - Map 4 Winner
167 shares @ 18.6¢·now 0.0¢·exp Mar 15, 2026$0.00
$-30.99
Recent activity
- TRADEBUYGames Total: O/U 2.5$35.00Mar 27, 16:45 UTC
- TRADEBUYCounter-Strike: Natus Vincere vs Aurora Gaming - Map 4 Winner$4.00Mar 15, 20:34 UTC
- TRADEBUYCounter-Strike: Natus Vincere vs Aurora Gaming - Map 4 Winner$25.37Mar 15, 20:31 UTC
- TRADEBUYCounter-Strike: Natus Vincere vs Aurora Gaming - Map 4 Winner$0.41Mar 15, 20:31 UTC
- TRADEBUYCounter-Strike: Natus Vincere vs Aurora Gaming - Map 4 Winner$0.81Mar 15, 20:31 UTC
- TRADEBUYCounter-Strike: Natus Vincere vs Aurora Gaming - Map 4 Winner$0.41Mar 15, 20:30 UTC
- TRADESELLWill Galatasaray SK win on 2026-03-10?$66.00Mar 10, 19:12 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill FC Barcelona win on 2026-03-10?$30.16Mar 10, 17:32 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Galatasaray SK win on 2026-03-10?$22.00Mar 10, 16:56 UTC
- TRADESELLWill Chelsea FC win on 2026-03-04?$52.16Mar 4, 21:12 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Chelsea FC win on 2026-03-04?$19.92Mar 4, 20:18 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Manchester United FC win on 2026-03-04?$39.84Mar 4, 20:12 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Manchester United FC win on 2026-02-10?$24.90Feb 10, 21:29 UTC
- TRADEBUYCounter-Strike: Team Falcons vs MOUZ (BO3) - IEM Krakow Group B$49.74Feb 3, 20:31 UTC
- TRADEBUYGames Total: O/U 2.5$20.00Feb 1, 21:00 UTC
- TRADESELLCounter-Strike: Natus Vincere vs Spirit - Map 1 Winner$81.99Feb 1, 20:07 UTC
- TRADESELLCounter-Strike: Natus Vincere vs Spirit - Map 1 Winner$1.57Feb 1, 20:07 UTC
- TRADEBUYCounter-Strike: Natus Vincere vs Spirit - Map 1 Winner$35.71Feb 1, 19:57 UTC
- TRADEBUYCounter-Strike: Natus Vincere vs Spirit - Map 1 Winner$12.57Feb 1, 19:57 UTC
- TRADEBUYCounter-Strike: Spirit vs Vitality - Map 2 Winner$40.00Dec 13, 18:06 UTC
Persistent ledger timeline
persistentNo trades for this wallet in Orrery's persistent ledger yet. The whale-ingest cron writes ≥ $5k trades every 10 minutes; check back after a recovery window.
Ledger intelligence
persistent7d volume
$0.00
0 trades
30d volume
$0.00
0 trades
Buy share
50%
Sample
low
0 ledger trades
No persistent whale trades for this wallet yet. The live Data API score above can still be useful, but the durable ledger sample is empty.
Profile dimensions
Trade count + how recently they were active. Low = dormant.
How trustworthy the win-rate number is, based on sample size of closed markets.
Share of trades concentrated in their top category.
Share of positions taken while the market was still uncertain (30–70¢) rather than after direction was obvious.
How risky to blindly copy. Higher = riskier — large size, single-position exposure, or thin win-rate sample.
- Trades (all time)
- 48
- Avg trade size
- $29.35
- Top category
- —
- Category concentration
- 0%
- First seen
- Dec 5, 20:45 UTC
- Last active
- Mar 27, 16:45 UTC
- Win rate sample
- 1 closed
The single Activity score is kept for the leaderboard sort. The five dimensions above are the canonical read — copy-risk bar is inverted so green is always "better for the user".