Mediocre-Automation
0xe7b1d92f32c5d1054795e145e7a803e3d8c9b709
Wallet digest
Activity score
40/100
Performance: thin sample
Open positions
1
Open notional
$0.00
Total PnL
$-110.00
Realised
$0.00
Win rate
n/a
too few closed
Recent activity
- TRADESELLArbitrum airdrop by March 31st?$2.01Mar 16, 16:41 UTC
- TRADEBUYArbitrum airdrop by March 31st?$51.75Mar 4, 18:07 UTC
- REDEEMWorld Cup: Monday - Will South Korea beat Ghana?$0.00Nov 29, 17:52 UTC
- REDEEMWill $ETH be above $1,000 on July 8?$0.00Nov 28, 12:37 UTC
- REDEEMWill $ETH be above $1,700 on June 17?$0.00Jun 18, 02:11 UTC
- REDEEMWill $ETH be above $1,700 on June 17?$0.03Jun 18, 02:10 UTC
- REDEEMWill $ETH be above $2,000 on May 27?$0.04Jun 10, 13:34 UTC
- REDEEMWill $MATIC reach 1$ again by June 1?$14.16Jun 3, 18:35 UTC
- REDEEMWill $ETH be above $2,000 on May 20?$0.00May 22, 09:13 UTC
- REDEEMWill $ETH be above $2500 on May 20?$10.21May 22, 09:05 UTC
Persistent ledger timeline
persistentNo trades for this wallet in Orrery's persistent ledger yet. The whale-ingest cron writes ≥ $5k trades every 10 minutes; check back after a recovery window.
Ledger intelligence
persistent7d volume
$0.00
0 trades
30d volume
$0.00
0 trades
Buy share
50%
Sample
low
0 ledger trades
No persistent whale trades for this wallet yet. The live Data API score above can still be useful, but the durable ledger sample is empty.
Profile dimensions
Trade count + how recently they were active. Low = dormant.
How trustworthy the win-rate number is, based on sample size of closed markets.
Share of trades concentrated in their top category.
Share of positions taken while the market was still uncertain (30–70¢) rather than after direction was obvious.
How risky to blindly copy. Higher = riskier — large size, single-position exposure, or thin win-rate sample.
- Trades (all time)
- 2
- Avg trade size
- $26.88
- Top category
- —
- Category concentration
- 0%
- First seen
- May 22, 09:05 UTC
- Last active
- Mar 16, 16:41 UTC
- Win rate sample
- 0 closed
The single Activity score is kept for the leaderboard sort. The five dimensions above are the canonical read — copy-risk bar is inverted so green is always "better for the user".