Growing-Counterforce
0xe8b7324f2a7d6da8c8d8e976d85711c23268a372
Wallet digest
Activity score
37/100
Performance measurable
Open positions
79
Open notional
$0.00
Total PnL
$-188.08
Realised
$2.45
Win rate
17%
6 closed
Largest open positions
showing 10 of 79- YES
Will Arsenal FC win on 2026-05-30?
5000 shares @ 0.1¢·now 0.0¢·exp May 30, 2026$0.00
$-5.00
- YES
Will Bodo/Glimt win on 2025-09-17?
1000 shares @ 0.1¢·now 0.0¢·exp Sep 17, 2025$0.00
$-1.00
- NO
Thailand strikes Cambodia by Friday?
500 shares @ 0.2¢·now 0.0¢·exp Jul 25, 2025$0.00
$-1.00
- YES
Fed decreases interest rates by 50+ bps after December 2025 meeting?
200 shares @ 0.5¢·now 0.0¢·exp Dec 10, 2025$0.00
$-1.00
- REAL BETIS
Spread: Barcelona (-1.5)
200 shares @ 0.5¢·now 0.0¢·exp Dec 6, 2025$0.00
$-1.10
- FIGUEIREDO
UFC 324: Figueiredo vs. Nurmagomedov (Bantamweight, Prelims)
200 shares @ 0.5¢·now 0.0¢·exp Jan 25, 2026$0.00
$-1.00
- YES
Will Ukraine agree to cede territory to Russia in 2025?
190 shares @ 2.6¢·now 0.0¢·exp Dec 31, 2025$0.00
$-4.98
- YES
Russia x Ukraine ceasefire in 2025?
153 shares @ 6.3¢·now 0.0¢·exp Dec 31, 2025$0.00
$-9.66
- YES
Will Usyk vs. Fury have no official winner?
117 shares @ 6.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Dec 21, 2024$0.00
$-7.00
- YES
US strikes Iran by January 25, 2026?
115 shares @ 1.3¢·now 0.0¢·exp Jan 31, 2026$0.00
$-1.50
Recent activity
- TRADEBUYExact Score: Santos FC 3 - 2 EC Vitória?$2.05May 31, 00:50 UTC
- TRADESELLExact Score: Santos FC 3 - 1 EC Vitória?$5.99May 31, 00:43 UTC
- TRADESELLExact Score: Santos FC 3 - 1 EC Vitória?$6.28May 31, 00:40 UTC
- TRADESELLExact Score: Santos FC 1 - 0 EC Vitória?$1.60May 30, 23:34 UTC
- TRADEBUYExact Score: SC Recife 1 - 1 Clube Náutico Capibaribe?$1.46May 30, 23:01 UTC
- TRADEBUYExact Score: Santos FC 0 - 1 EC Vitória?$1.48May 30, 22:51 UTC
- TRADEBUYExact Score: Santos FC 1 - 0 EC Vitória?$1.48May 30, 22:50 UTC
- TRADESELLEC Bahia vs. Botafogo FR: O/U 2.5$6.44May 30, 22:46 UTC
- TRADEBUYExact Score: Santos FC 3 - 1 EC Vitória?$1.54May 30, 22:32 UTC
- TRADEBUYEC Bahia vs. Botafogo FR: O/U 2.5$2.04May 30, 22:27 UTC
- TRADEBUYExact Score: SC Recife 2 - 1 Clube Náutico Capibaribe?$1.15May 30, 22:20 UTC
- TRADEBUYAthletic Club vs. Fortaleza EC: Both Teams to Score$1.24May 30, 21:55 UTC
- TRADESELLEthereum Up or Down - May 30, 3:00PM-3:15PM ET$1.23May 30, 19:09 UTC
- TRADEBUYEthereum Up or Down - May 30, 3:00PM-3:15PM ET$5.28May 30, 19:06 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Arsenal FC win on 2026-05-30?$5.15May 30, 18:56 UTC
- TRADEBUYBitcoin Up or Down - March 16, 8:45PM-8:50PM ET$1.75Mar 17, 00:46 UTC
- REDEEMBitcoin Up or Down - March 16, 8:35PM-8:40PM ET$0.00Mar 17, 00:46 UTC
- TRADEBUYBitcoin Up or Down - March 16, 8:40PM-8:45PM ET$1.00Mar 17, 00:42 UTC
- TRADEBUYBitcoin Up or Down - March 16, 8:35PM-8:40PM ET$2.00Mar 17, 00:35 UTC
- TRADEBUYBitcoin Up or Down - March 16, 8:30PM-8:35PM ET$1.00Mar 17, 00:32 UTC
Persistent ledger timeline
persistentNo trades for this wallet in Orrery's persistent ledger yet. The whale-ingest cron writes ≥ $5k trades every 10 minutes; check back after a recovery window.
Ledger intelligence
persistent7d volume
$0.00
0 trades
30d volume
$0.00
0 trades
Buy share
50%
Sample
low
0 ledger trades
No persistent whale trades for this wallet yet. The live Data API score above can still be useful, but the durable ledger sample is empty.
Profile dimensions
Trade count + how recently they were active. Low = dormant.
How trustworthy the win-rate number is, based on sample size of closed markets.
Share of trades concentrated in their top category.
Share of positions taken while the market was still uncertain (30–70¢) rather than after direction was obvious.
How risky to blindly copy. Higher = riskier — large size, single-position exposure, or thin win-rate sample.
- Trades (all time)
- 46
- Avg trade size
- $2.30
- Top category
- —
- Category concentration
- 0%
- First seen
- Dec 10, 01:06 UTC
- Last active
- May 31, 00:50 UTC
- Win rate sample
- 6 closed
The single Activity score is kept for the leaderboard sort. The five dimensions above are the canonical read — copy-risk bar is inverted so green is always "better for the user".