0xea31452a5581afd3f9024e39f93f25c3b834f286
0xea31452a5581afd3f9024e39f93f25c3b834f286
Wallet digest
Activity score
59/100
Performance: thin sample
Open positions
50
Open notional
$7.13
Total PnL
$-13.0K
Realised
$0.00
Win rate
n/a
too few closed
Largest open positions
showing 10 of 50- NO
Will Ethereum dip to $1,500 by December 31, 2026?
20 shares @ 26.0¢·now 27.5¢·exp Jan 1, 2027$5.50
$0.30
- YES
Pedro Sánchez out as PM of Spain by June 30, 2026?
44 shares @ 9.0¢·now 3.7¢·exp Jun 30, 2026$1.63
$-2.33
- YES
Will Nottingham Forest FC win on 2026-01-03?
2810 shares @ 21.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Jan 3, 2026$0.00
$-590.10
- PACKERS
Packers vs. Bears
2500 shares @ 55.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Jan 11, 2026$0.00
$-1.4K
- TEXAS TECH RED RAIDERS
Spread: Texas Tech Red Raiders (-5.5)
2200 shares @ 50.4¢·now 0.0¢·exp Jan 11, 2026$0.00
$-1.1K
- NO
Will Liverpool FC win on 2025-12-27?
2100 shares @ 21.8¢·now 0.0¢·exp Dec 27, 2025$0.00
$-457.00
- NO
Will Celtic FC win on 2025-12-27?
1834 shares @ 31.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Dec 27, 2025$0.00
$-568.49
- YES
Will Athletic Club win on 2025-12-22?
1667 shares @ 52.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Dec 22, 2025$0.00
$-866.84
- NO
Will Arsenal FC win on 2025-12-20?
1380 shares @ 37.9¢·now 0.0¢·exp Dec 20, 2025$0.00
$-522.60
- GOLDEN KNIGHTS
Devils vs. Golden Knights
1290 shares @ 60.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Dec 18, 2025$0.00
$-774.00
Recent activity
- TRADEBUYWill Ethereum dip to $1,500 by December 31, 2026?$5.20Feb 19, 22:40 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill AC Milan vs. Como 1907 end in a draw?$244.90Feb 18, 21:34 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill AC Milan vs. Como 1907 end in a draw?$1.45Feb 18, 21:34 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill AC Milan vs. Como 1907 end in a draw?$0.15Feb 18, 21:34 UTC
- REDEEMWill FC Barcelona win on 2026-02-12?$589.98Feb 13, 01:39 UTC
- MAKER_REBATE$0.19Feb 13, 00:12 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill FC Barcelona win on 2026-02-12?$1.74Feb 12, 20:37 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Club Atlético de Madrid vs. FC Barcelona end in a draw?$0.07Feb 12, 20:28 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Club Atlético de Madrid vs. FC Barcelona end in a draw?$35.85Feb 12, 20:28 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Club Atlético de Madrid vs. FC Barcelona end in a draw?$15.07Feb 12, 20:27 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Club Atlético de Madrid vs. FC Barcelona end in a draw?$1.50Feb 12, 20:27 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Club Atlético de Madrid vs. FC Barcelona end in a draw?$4.50Feb 12, 20:27 UTC
- TRADESELLUS strikes Iran by February 28, 2026?$56.00Feb 12, 19:17 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill FC Barcelona win on 2026-02-12?$108.30Feb 12, 19:13 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill FC Barcelona win on 2026-02-12?$51.21Feb 12, 17:45 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill FC Barcelona win on 2026-02-12?$14.58Feb 12, 17:45 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill FC Barcelona win on 2026-02-12?$2.82Feb 12, 17:44 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill FC Barcelona win on 2026-02-12?$159.38Feb 12, 17:44 UTC
- TRADEBUYUS strikes Iran by February 28, 2026?$28.00Feb 12, 17:32 UTC
- TRADEBUYUS strikes Iran by February 28, 2026?$30.00Feb 12, 17:15 UTC
Persistent ledger timeline
persistentNo trades for this wallet in Orrery's persistent ledger yet. The whale-ingest cron writes ≥ $5k trades every 10 minutes; check back after a recovery window.
Ledger intelligence
persistent7d volume
$0.00
0 trades
30d volume
$0.00
0 trades
Buy share
50%
Sample
low
0 ledger trades
No persistent whale trades for this wallet yet. The live Data API score above can still be useful, but the durable ledger sample is empty.
Profile dimensions
Trade count + how recently they were active. Low = dormant.
How trustworthy the win-rate number is, based on sample size of closed markets.
Share of trades concentrated in their top category.
Share of positions taken while the market was still uncertain (30–70¢) rather than after direction was obvious.
How risky to blindly copy. Higher = riskier — large size, single-position exposure, or thin win-rate sample.
- Trades (all time)
- 48
- Avg trade size
- $29.32
- Top category
- —
- Category concentration
- 0%
- First seen
- Feb 12, 10:05 UTC
- Last active
- Feb 19, 22:40 UTC
- Win rate sample
- 0 closed
The single Activity score is kept for the leaderboard sort. The five dimensions above are the canonical read — copy-risk bar is inverted so green is always "better for the user".