0xea410f47deaf039af26f22f817a413ddfa40a131
0xea410f47deaf039af26f22f817a413ddfa40a131
Wallet digest
Activity score
88/100
Performance: thin sample
Open positions
5
Open notional
$353.31
Total PnL
$-0.04
Realised
$0.00
Win rate
n/a
too few closed
Largest open positions
- SHARKS
Counter-Strike: Sharks vs Lynn Vision (BO1) - IEM Cologne Major Stage 1
158 shares @ 51.0¢·now 50.5¢·exp Jun 3, 2026$79.95
$-0.79
- BETBOOM TEAM
Counter-Strike: GamerLegion vs BetBoom Team - Map 2 Winner
161 shares @ 52.0¢·now 49.5¢·exp Jun 3, 2026$79.62
$-4.02
- MIBR
Counter-Strike: Liquid vs MIBR (BO1) - IEM Cologne Major Stage 1
158 shares @ 53.0¢·now 49.5¢·exp Jun 3, 2026$78.42
$-5.54
- B8
Counter-Strike: M80 vs B8 (BO3) - IEM Cologne Major Stage 1
133 shares @ 60.0¢·now 58.5¢·exp Jun 3, 2026$78.00
$-2.00
- GAMERLEGION
Counter-Strike: GamerLegion vs FlyQuest (BO1) - IEM Cologne Major Stage 1
37 shares @ 67.0¢·now 100.0¢·exp Jun 3, 2026$37.31
$12.31
Recent activity
- TRADEBUYCounter-Strike: Sharks vs Lynn Vision (BO1) - IEM Cologne Major Stage 1$82.33Jun 3, 00:56 UTC
- TRADEBUYCounter-Strike: Liquid vs MIBR (BO1) - IEM Cologne Major Stage 1$85.57Jun 3, 00:56 UTC
- TRADEBUYCounter-Strike: M80 vs B8 (BO3) - IEM Cologne Major Stage 1$81.36Jun 3, 00:54 UTC
- TRADEBUYCounter-Strike: GamerLegion vs BetBoom Team - Map 2 Winner$85.26Jun 3, 00:53 UTC
- REDEEMUS strikes Iran by June 30, 2026?$0.00Jun 2, 21:01 UTC
- REDEEMUS strikes Iran by June 30, 2026?$0.00Jun 2, 21:01 UTC
- REDEEMCounter-Strike: Sinners vs NRG (BO1) - IEM Cologne Major Stage 1$0.00Jun 2, 21:01 UTC
- REDEEMCounter-Strike: B8 vs THUNDER dOWNUNDER (BO1) - IEM Cologne Major Stage 1$15.63Jun 2, 19:38 UTC
- TRADEBUYCounter-Strike: GamerLegion vs FlyQuest (BO1) - IEM Cologne Major Stage 1$25.37Jun 2, 16:08 UTC
- TRADEBUYCounter-Strike: Sinners vs NRG (BO1) - IEM Cologne Major Stage 1$25.45Jun 2, 16:07 UTC
- TRADEBUYCounter-Strike: B8 vs THUNDER dOWNUNDER (BO1) - IEM Cologne Major Stage 1$10.16Jun 2, 16:06 UTC
- REDEEMWill MOUZ win PGL Cluj-Napoca 2026?$0.00Feb 28, 08:59 UTC
- REDEEMCounter-Strike: Vitality vs Aurora Gaming (BO3) - PGL Cluj-Napoca Playoffs$120.48Feb 21, 00:51 UTC
- REDEEMCounter-Strike: Team Falcons vs PARIVISION (BO3) - PGL Cluj-Napoca Playoffs$0.00Feb 21, 00:50 UTC
- REDEEMCounter-Strike: MOUZ vs Natus Vincere (BO3) - PGL Cluj-Napoca Playoffs$156.25Feb 20, 19:27 UTC
- TRADEBUYCounter-Strike: Vitality vs Aurora Gaming (BO3) - PGL Cluj-Napoca Playoffs$100.00Feb 20, 06:14 UTC
- TRADEBUYCounter-Strike: MOUZ vs Natus Vincere (BO3) - PGL Cluj-Napoca Playoffs$100.00Feb 20, 06:14 UTC
- TRADEBUYCounter-Strike: Team Falcons vs PARIVISION (BO3) - PGL Cluj-Napoca Playoffs$100.00Feb 20, 06:13 UTC
- REDEEMCounter-Strike: G2 vs PARIVISION (BO3) - PGL Cluj-Napoca Group Stage$0.00Feb 15, 18:19 UTC
- REDEEMCounter-Strike: 3DMAX vs Astralis (BO3) - PGL Cluj-Napoca Group Stage$0.00Feb 15, 15:58 UTC
Persistent ledger timeline
persistentNo trades for this wallet in Orrery's persistent ledger yet. The whale-ingest cron writes ≥ $5k trades every 10 minutes; check back after a recovery window.
Ledger intelligence
persistent7d volume
$0.00
0 trades
30d volume
$0.00
0 trades
Buy share
50%
Sample
low
0 ledger trades
No persistent whale trades for this wallet yet. The live Data API score above can still be useful, but the durable ledger sample is empty.
Profile dimensions
Trade count + how recently they were active. Low = dormant.
How trustworthy the win-rate number is, based on sample size of closed markets.
Share of trades concentrated in their top category.
Share of positions taken while the market was still uncertain (30–70¢) rather than after direction was obvious.
How risky to blindly copy. Higher = riskier — large size, single-position exposure, or thin win-rate sample.
- Trades (all time)
- 19
- Avg trade size
- $52.82
- Top category
- —
- Category concentration
- 0%
- First seen
- Feb 13, 12:13 UTC
- Last active
- Jun 3, 00:56 UTC
- Win rate sample
- 0 closed
The single Activity score is kept for the leaderboard sort. The five dimensions above are the canonical read — copy-risk bar is inverted so green is always "better for the user".