Happy-Go-Lucky-Child
0xea4b6a32cf878300cbf74af019aa4fb9bed007fa
Wallet digest
Activity score
30/100
Performance measurable
Open positions
88
Open notional
$0.00
Total PnL
$-1.0K
Realised
$-202.06
Win rate
0%
18 closed
Largest open positions
showing 10 of 88- UP
Bitcoin Up or Down - April 24, 8:20PM-8:25PM ET
175 shares @ 61.4¢·now 0.0¢·exp Apr 25, 2026$0.00
$-107.33
- UP
Bitcoin Up or Down - May 3, 4:10PM-4:15PM ET
171 shares @ 75.4¢·now 0.0¢·exp May 3, 2026$0.00
$-128.70
- UP
Bitcoin Up or Down - May 4, 6:20AM-6:25AM ET
160 shares @ 63.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp May 4, 2026$0.00
$-101.00
- DOWN
Bitcoin Up or Down - April 23, 3:45AM-3:50AM ET
131 shares @ 78.9¢·now 0.0¢·exp Apr 23, 2026$0.00
$-103.17
- DOWN
Bitcoin Up or Down - April 25, 12:05AM-12:10AM ET
38 shares @ 98.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Apr 25, 2026$0.00
$-37.19
- DOWN
Solana Up or Down - April 23, 3:45AM-3:50AM ET
38 shares @ 72.4¢·now 0.0¢·exp Apr 23, 2026$0.00
$-27.20
- DOWN
Solana Up or Down - May 3, 10:15AM-10:20AM ET
35 shares @ 82.5¢·now 0.0¢·exp May 3, 2026$0.00
$-29.00
- UP
Bitcoin Up or Down - May 4, 6:15AM-6:20AM ET
33 shares @ 51.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp May 4, 2026$0.00
$-16.70
- DOWN
Bitcoin Up or Down - April 24, 6:45AM-6:50AM ET
31 shares @ 74.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Apr 24, 2026$0.00
$-22.88
- ATHLETICS
San Francisco Giants vs. Athletics
30 shares @ 8.8¢·now 0.0¢·exp May 24, 2026$0.00
$-2.64
Recent activity
- TRADESELLTexas Rangers vs. Colorado Rockies$0.73May 20, 21:52 UTC
- TRADEBUYTexas Rangers vs. Colorado Rockies$1.71May 20, 21:36 UTC
- TRADESELLWill Liaoning Tieren FC win on 2026-05-20?$0.17May 20, 13:46 UTC
- TRADESELLShanghai Shenhua FC vs. Wuhan San Zhen FC: O/U 2.5$2.08May 20, 13:46 UTC
- TRADESELLZhejiang Zhiye FC vs. Shandong Taishan FC: O/U 4.5$1.54May 20, 13:45 UTC
- TRADEBUYZhejiang Zhiye FC vs. Shandong Taishan FC: O/U 4.5$2.03May 20, 13:44 UTC
- TRADESELLWill Liaoning Tieren FC win on 2026-05-20?$1.18May 20, 12:20 UTC
- TRADEBUYShanghai Shenhua FC vs. Wuhan San Zhen FC: O/U 2.5$1.45May 20, 12:06 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Liaoning Tieren FC win on 2026-05-20?$1.67May 20, 11:26 UTC
- REDEEMWill Manchester City FC win on 2026-05-19?$0.00May 20, 08:44 UTC
- REDEEMKahrabaa Ismailia FC vs. Haras El Hodood SC: O/U 2.5$0.17May 20, 08:44 UTC
- REDEEMWill AC Monza win on 2026-05-19?$0.24May 20, 08:44 UTC
- REDEEMAssociação Chapecoense de Futebol vs. Clube do Remo: O/U 3.5$0.29May 20, 08:44 UTC
- REDEEMChengdu Rongcheng FC vs. Shanghai Haigang FC: O/U 1.5$0.37May 20, 08:44 UTC
- REDEEMWill AFC Bournemouth win on 2026-05-19?$0.56May 20, 08:44 UTC
- REDEEMWill CD Coquimbo Unido win on 2026-05-19?$0.00May 20, 08:44 UTC
- REDEEMWill CD Cuenca win on 2026-05-19?$0.00May 20, 08:44 UTC
- REDEEMWill Manchester City FC win on 2026-05-19?$0.00May 20, 08:44 UTC
- REDEEMWill CD Cuenca win on 2026-05-19?$2.10May 20, 07:55 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill CD Cuenca win on 2026-05-19?$1.75May 20, 03:50 UTC
Persistent ledger timeline
persistentNo trades for this wallet in Orrery's persistent ledger yet. The whale-ingest cron writes ≥ $5k trades every 10 minutes; check back after a recovery window.
Ledger intelligence
persistent7d volume
$0.00
0 trades
30d volume
$0.00
0 trades
Buy share
50%
Sample
low
0 ledger trades
No persistent whale trades for this wallet yet. The live Data API score above can still be useful, but the durable ledger sample is empty.
Profile dimensions
Trade count + how recently they were active. Low = dormant.
How trustworthy the win-rate number is, based on sample size of closed markets.
Share of trades concentrated in their top category.
Share of positions taken while the market was still uncertain (30–70¢) rather than after direction was obvious.
How risky to blindly copy. Higher = riskier — large size, single-position exposure, or thin win-rate sample.
- Trades (all time)
- 34
- Avg trade size
- $1.59
- Top category
- —
- Category concentration
- 0%
- First seen
- May 19, 19:07 UTC
- Last active
- May 20, 21:52 UTC
- Win rate sample
- 18 closed
The single Activity score is kept for the leaderboard sort. The five dimensions above are the canonical read — copy-risk bar is inverted so green is always "better for the user".