Anguished-Spiritual
0xea7738bacd5caa24d7d4f69f83f66cb08158686e
Wallet digest
Activity score
50/100
Performance: thin sample
Open positions
178
Open notional
$0.00
Total PnL
$-2.3K
Realised
$0.00
Win rate
n/a
too few closed
Largest open positions
showing 10 of 178- YES
Will West Ham United FC win on 2026-04-04?
11178 shares @ 0.2¢·now 0.0¢·exp Apr 4, 2026$0.00
$-23.99
- YES
Will Italy win on 2026-03-31?
3880 shares @ 0.1¢·now 0.0¢·exp Mar 31, 2026$0.00
$-3.88
- YES
Will Bosnia and Herzegovina win on 2026-03-31?
3880 shares @ 0.1¢·now 0.0¢·exp Mar 31, 2026$0.00
$-3.88
- YES
Will West Ham United FC win on 2026-03-07?
1000 shares @ 0.1¢·now 0.0¢·exp Mar 7, 2026$0.00
$-1.00
- YES
Will Leeds United FC win on 2026-04-04?
1000 shares @ 0.1¢·now 0.0¢·exp Apr 4, 2026$0.00
$-1.00
- OVER
AC Reggiana 1919 vs. Carrarese Calcio: O/U 2.5
288 shares @ 73.9¢·now 0.0¢·exp Apr 12, 2026$0.00
$-212.63
- YES
AC Reggiana 1919 vs. Carrarese Calcio: Both Teams to Score
134 shares @ 74.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Apr 12, 2026$0.00
$-99.22
- OVER
US Sassuolo Calcio vs. Como 1907: O/U 3.5
122 shares @ 64.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Apr 17, 2026$0.00
$-77.86
- OVER
Wuhan San Zhen FC vs. Chengdu Rongcheng FC: O/U 1.5
112 shares @ 62.4¢·now 0.0¢·exp Apr 17, 2026$0.00
$-70.00
- OVER
CA River Plate vs. Carabobo FC: O/U 1.5
89 shares @ 78.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Apr 16, 2026$0.00
$-69.54
Recent activity
- TRADEBUYChelsea FC vs. Manchester United FC: Both Teams to Score$27.60Apr 18, 19:54 UTC
- REDEEMCerezo Ōsaka vs. Kyōto Sanga FC: O/U 1.5$27.60Apr 18, 11:20 UTC
- TRADEBUYCerezo Ōsaka vs. Kyōto Sanga FC: O/U 1.5$22.31Apr 17, 21:46 UTC
- TRADEBUYTōkyō Verdy vs. JEF United Ichihara Chiba: O/U 1.5$15.00Apr 17, 21:46 UTC
- TRADESELLWill FC Internazionale Milano win on 2026-04-17?$37.31Apr 17, 21:29 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill FC Internazionale Milano win on 2026-04-17?$26.02Apr 17, 19:19 UTC
- TRADESELLFenerbahçe SK vs. Çaykur Rizespor: O/U 2.5$26.01Apr 17, 19:11 UTC
- TRADEBUYFenerbahçe SK vs. Çaykur Rizespor: O/U 2.5$14.00Apr 17, 18:50 UTC
- TRADESELLUC Sampdoria vs. AC Monza: O/U 1.5$14.01Apr 17, 18:50 UTC
- TRADEBUYUS Sassuolo Calcio vs. Como 1907: O/U 3.5$78.71Apr 17, 17:57 UTC
- TRADESELLUS Sassuolo Calcio vs. Como 1907: Both Teams to Score$18.24Apr 17, 17:56 UTC
- TRADEBUYUS Sassuolo Calcio vs. Como 1907: Both Teams to Score$10.00Apr 17, 14:42 UTC
- TRADEBUYUC Sampdoria vs. AC Monza: O/U 1.5$10.00Apr 17, 14:40 UTC
- TRADEBUYSV 07 Elversberg vs. Karlsruher SC: Both Teams to Score$10.00Apr 17, 14:40 UTC
- TRADEBUYWuhan San Zhen FC vs. Chengdu Rongcheng FC: O/U 1.5$10.00Apr 17, 13:23 UTC
- TRADEBUYYunnan Yukun FC vs. Tianjin Jinmen Hu FC: Both Teams to Score$56.00Apr 17, 13:14 UTC
- TRADESELLCruzeiro EC vs. CD Universidad Católica: O/U 1.5$26.78Apr 17, 13:11 UTC
- TRADESELLRacing Club vs. Botafogo FR: O/U 1.5$29.09Apr 17, 13:11 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Yunnan Yukun FC win on 2026-04-17?$32.00Apr 17, 12:30 UTC
- TRADEBUYWuhan San Zhen FC vs. Chengdu Rongcheng FC: O/U 1.5$60.00Apr 17, 12:21 UTC
Persistent ledger timeline
persistentNo trades for this wallet in Orrery's persistent ledger yet. The whale-ingest cron writes ≥ $5k trades every 10 minutes; check back after a recovery window.
Ledger intelligence
persistent7d volume
$0.00
0 trades
30d volume
$0.00
0 trades
Buy share
50%
Sample
low
0 ledger trades
No persistent whale trades for this wallet yet. The live Data API score above can still be useful, but the durable ledger sample is empty.
Profile dimensions
Trade count + how recently they were active. Low = dormant.
How trustworthy the win-rate number is, based on sample size of closed markets.
Share of trades concentrated in their top category.
Share of positions taken while the market was still uncertain (30–70¢) rather than after direction was obvious.
How risky to blindly copy. Higher = riskier — large size, single-position exposure, or thin win-rate sample.
- Trades (all time)
- 35
- Avg trade size
- $26.99
- Top category
- —
- Category concentration
- 0%
- First seen
- Apr 14, 21:38 UTC
- Last active
- Apr 18, 19:54 UTC
- Win rate sample
- 0 closed
The single Activity score is kept for the leaderboard sort. The five dimensions above are the canonical read — copy-risk bar is inverted so green is always "better for the user".