Elegant-Mechanic
0xeb3f53f14ed06be6ed6d0668eddf059bb1697589
Wallet digest
Activity score
50/100
Performance: thin sample
Open positions
36
Open notional
$0.00
Total PnL
$-755.80
Realised
$0.59
Win rate
n/a
too few closed
Largest open positions
showing 10 of 36- DOWN
Bitcoin Up or Down - November 28, 10AM ET
69 shares @ 13.6¢·now 0.0¢·exp Nov 28, 2025$0.00
$-9.38
- UNDER
SS Lazio vs. ACF Fiorentina: O/U 3.5
66 shares @ 97.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Jan 7, 2026$0.00
$-64.02
- UNDER
FC Bayern München vs. Sporting CP: O/U 3.5
60 shares @ 86.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Dec 9, 2025$0.00
$-51.60
- UNDER
CA Osasuna vs. Deportivo Alavés: O/U 1.5
60 shares @ 88.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Dec 20, 2025$0.00
$-52.80
- UNDER
Wrexham AFC vs. Nottingham Forest FC: O/U 4.5
50 shares @ 80.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Jan 9, 2026$0.00
$-40.00
- UNDER
Cagliari Calcio vs. Pisa SC: O/U 3.5
50 shares @ 81.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Dec 21, 2025$0.00
$-40.50
- DOWN
Bitcoin Up or Down - November 29, 6AM ET
50 shares @ 21.6¢·now 0.0¢·exp Nov 29, 2025$0.00
$-10.79
- DOWN
Bitcoin Up or Down - November 26, 3:00PM-3:15PM ET
47 shares @ 85.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Nov 26, 2025$0.00
$-40.00
- UP
Bitcoin Up or Down - November 26, 9:30AM-9:45AM ET
44 shares @ 45.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Nov 26, 2025$0.00
$-20.00
- YES
Will Real Sociedad de Fútbol win on 2025-12-20?
44 shares @ 95.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Dec 20, 2025$0.00
$-41.80
Recent activity
- TRADESELLReal Oviedo vs. Athletic Club: O/U 2.5$6.10Feb 15, 14:25 UTC
- TRADESELLReal Oviedo vs. Athletic Club: O/U 2.5$4.10Feb 15, 14:18 UTC
- TRADEBUYReal Oviedo vs. Athletic Club: O/U 2.5$4.10Feb 15, 14:18 UTC
- TRADEBUYReal Oviedo vs. Athletic Club: O/U 2.5$5.90Feb 15, 14:16 UTC
- TRADESELLManchester United FC vs. Brighton & Hove Albion FC: O/U 4.5$52.47Jan 11, 18:08 UTC
- TRADEBUYManchester United FC vs. Brighton & Hove Albion FC: O/U 4.5$21.39Jan 11, 17:58 UTC
- TRADEBUYManchester United FC vs. Brighton & Hove Albion FC: O/U 4.5$27.90Jan 11, 17:58 UTC
- TRADESELLSparta Rotterdam vs. Heracles Almelo: O/U 4.5$24.98Jan 11, 17:37 UTC
- TRADESELLSparta Rotterdam vs. Heracles Almelo: O/U 3.5$24.75Jan 11, 17:25 UTC
- TRADEBUYSparta Rotterdam vs. Heracles Almelo: O/U 3.5$23.50Jan 11, 17:15 UTC
- TRADEBUYSparta Rotterdam vs. Heracles Almelo: O/U 4.5$24.00Jan 11, 17:04 UTC
- TRADESELLFulham FC vs. Middlesbrough FC: O/U 4.5$46.94Jan 10, 16:50 UTC
- TRADEBUYFulham FC vs. Middlesbrough FC: O/U 4.5$44.65Jan 10, 16:35 UTC
- TRADESELLSC Freiburg vs. Hamburger SV: O/U 3.5$45.54Jan 10, 16:32 UTC
- TRADEBUYSC Freiburg vs. Hamburger SV: O/U 3.5$43.24Jan 10, 15:28 UTC
- TRADESELLSC Freiburg vs. Hamburger SV: O/U 4.5$42.57Jan 10, 15:24 UTC
- TRADEBUYSC Freiburg vs. Hamburger SV: O/U 4.5$41.28Jan 10, 14:58 UTC
- TRADESELLEverton FC vs. Sunderland AFC: O/U 4.5$41.96Jan 10, 13:56 UTC
- TRADEBUYEverton FC vs. Sunderland AFC: O/U 4.5$40.32Jan 10, 13:01 UTC
- TRADESELLMilton Keynes Dons FC vs. Oxford United FC: O/U 3.5$29.70Jan 9, 21:25 UTC
Persistent ledger timeline
persistentNo trades for this wallet in Orrery's persistent ledger yet. The whale-ingest cron writes ≥ $5k trades every 10 minutes; check back after a recovery window.
Ledger intelligence
persistent7d volume
$0.00
0 trades
30d volume
$0.00
0 trades
Buy share
50%
Sample
low
0 ledger trades
No persistent whale trades for this wallet yet. The live Data API score above can still be useful, but the durable ledger sample is empty.
Profile dimensions
Trade count + how recently they were active. Low = dormant.
How trustworthy the win-rate number is, based on sample size of closed markets.
Share of trades concentrated in their top category.
Share of positions taken while the market was still uncertain (30–70¢) rather than after direction was obvious.
How risky to blindly copy. Higher = riskier — large size, single-position exposure, or thin win-rate sample.
- Trades (all time)
- 50
- Avg trade size
- $33.45
- Top category
- —
- Category concentration
- 0%
- First seen
- Jan 6, 15:16 UTC
- Last active
- Feb 15, 14:25 UTC
- Win rate sample
- 2 closed
The single Activity score is kept for the leaderboard sort. The five dimensions above are the canonical read — copy-risk bar is inverted so green is always "better for the user".