Sour-Gold
0xeb54a1ac7fc377eda072f886ceb050a56fa8ed59
Wallet digest
Activity score
52/100
Performance measurable
Open positions
149
Open notional
$0.00
Total PnL
$-4.4K
Realised
$-17.87
Win rate
56%
9 closed
Largest open positions
showing 10 of 149- YES
Exact Score: Spain 3 - 3 Belgium?
538 shares @ 1.3¢·now 0.0¢·exp Jul 10, 2026$0.00
$-7.00
- YES
Exact Score: Paraguay 2 - 1 France?
500 shares @ 1.4¢·now 0.0¢·exp Jul 4, 2026$0.00
$-7.00
- YES
Exact Score: Switzerland 3 - 3 Colombia?
455 shares @ 1.1¢·now 0.0¢·exp Jul 7, 2026$0.00
$-5.00
- DEIVESON FIGUEIREDO
UFC Fight Night: Song Yadong vs. Deiveson Figueiredo (Bantamweight, Main Card)
386 shares @ 19.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp May 31, 2026$0.00
$-73.40
- ALL GAMERS
Valorant: All Gamers vs G2 Esports (BO3) - VCT Masters Santiago Playoffs
379 shares @ 19.8¢·now 0.0¢·exp Mar 8, 2026$0.00
$-75.00
- KT ROLSTER
LoL: T1 vs KT Rolster (BO5)
328 shares @ 21.3¢·now 0.0¢·exp Nov 9, 2025$0.00
$-70.00
- TYLOO
Valorant: TYLOO vs Bilibili Gaming (BO5) - China Evolution Series Act 1 Playoffs
259 shares @ 30.9¢·now 0.0¢·exp Mar 22, 2026$0.00
$-80.00
- ROCKETS
Rockets vs. Mavericks
250 shares @ 4.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Dec 7, 2025$0.00
$-10.00
- YES
Will 1. FC Heidenheim 1846 win on 2025-12-21?
250 shares @ 6.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Dec 21, 2025$0.00
$-15.00
- YES
Exact Score: England 3 - 2 Argentina?
227 shares @ 2.2¢·now 0.0¢·exp Jul 15, 2026$0.00
$-5.00
Recent activity
- TRADESELLValorant: JD Gaming vs Trace Esports (BO3) - VCT China Stage 2 Group Alpha$5.93Jul 21, 10:40 UTC
- TRADEBUYValorant: JD Gaming vs Trace Esports (BO3) - VCT China Stage 2 Group Alpha$20.86Jul 21, 10:31 UTC
- TRADEBUYValorant: JD Gaming vs Trace Esports - Map 2 Winner$20.72Jul 21, 10:29 UTC
- TRADEBUYValorant: Bilibili Gaming vs XLG Gaming - Map 1 Winner$10.45Jul 20, 11:57 UTC
- TRADEBUYValorant: TEC Esports vs All Gamers - Map 2 Winner$22.86Jul 20, 10:39 UTC
- TRADEBUYValorant: Team Vitality vs BBL Esports - Map 1 Winner$20.00Jul 19, 16:28 UTC
- TRADEBUYValorant: EDward Gaming vs JD Gaming - Map 2 Winner$10.26Jul 19, 15:27 UTC
- TRADEBUYValorant: Dragon Ranger Gaming vs Wolves Esports - Map 1 Winner$12.81Jul 19, 11:18 UTC
- TRADEBUYValorant: Dragon Ranger Gaming vs Wolves Esports - Map 1 Winner$1.08Jul 19, 11:18 UTC
- TRADEBUYValorant: Dragon Ranger Gaming vs Wolves Esports - Map 1 Winner$21.80Jul 19, 11:18 UTC
- TRADESELLValorant: Nongshim RedForce vs Gen.G Esports - Map 2 Winner$2.55Jul 19, 09:38 UTC
- TRADESELLValorant: Nongshim RedForce vs Gen.G Esports - Map 2 Winner$1.65Jul 19, 09:36 UTC
- TRADESELLValorant: Nongshim RedForce vs Gen.G Esports - Map 2 Winner$3.45Jul 19, 09:36 UTC
- TRADESELLValorant: Nongshim RedForce vs Gen.G Esports - Map 2 Winner$2.85Jul 19, 09:36 UTC
- TRADESELLValorant: Nongshim RedForce vs Gen.G Esports - Map 2 Winner$2.85Jul 19, 09:36 UTC
- TRADESELLValorant: Nongshim RedForce vs Gen.G Esports - Map 2 Winner$1.50Jul 19, 09:36 UTC
- TRADESELLValorant: Nongshim RedForce vs Gen.G Esports - Map 2 Winner$5.70Jul 19, 09:35 UTC
- TRADESELLValorant: Nongshim RedForce vs Gen.G Esports - Map 2 Winner$5.70Jul 19, 09:35 UTC
- TRADESELLValorant: Nongshim RedForce vs Gen.G Esports - Map 2 Winner$3.00Jul 19, 09:34 UTC
- TRADEBUYValorant: Nongshim RedForce vs Gen.G Esports - Map 2 Winner$13.00Jul 19, 09:24 UTC
Persistent ledger timeline
persistentNo trades for this wallet in Orrery's persistent ledger yet. The whale-ingest cron writes ≥ $5k trades every 10 minutes; check back after a recovery window.
Wallet edge sanity
Needs review
31/100Useful as a watchlist input, but the edge claim still needs resolved history, cost, and source checks.
Closed-market sample is still too small to treat the win rate as durable.
Use this wallet as an attention signal only, then verify liquidity and resolution risk.
Required before treating wallet flow as useful
56% win rate over 9 closed markets.
A wallet trade is not useful unless a later follower could still enter after spread, slippage, and latency.
Large positions need enough depth to exit; mark-to-market PnL is not cash.
The trade still needs source, expiry, dispute, and settlement checks at the market level.
Leaderboards surface visible winners; losing or abandoned wallets disappear from attention.
Wallet intelligence filter
Watch only
14/100Wallet flow is useful for attention, but missing/review stages stop it from becoming paper attribution.
48 live trades, 0 ledger trades, copy-risk 52/100.
9 closed markets. Enough to inspect, not enough to trust.
No market-level spread or simulated execution cost is attached yet.
No source/expiry/dispute risk context is attached yet.
No market liquidity/depth context is attached yet.
No delayed-entry simulation is attached yet.
No paper receipts attribute this wallet signal to later outcomes yet.
Ledger intelligence
persistent7d volume
$0.00
0 trades
30d volume
$0.00
0 trades
Buy share
50%
Sample
low
0 ledger trades
No persistent whale trades for this wallet yet. The live Data API score above can still be useful, but the durable ledger sample is empty.
Profile dimensions
Trade count + how recently they were active. Low = dormant.
How trustworthy the win-rate number is, based on sample size of closed markets.
Share of trades concentrated in their top category.
Share of positions taken while the market was still uncertain (30–70¢) rather than after direction was obvious.
How risky to blindly copy. Higher = riskier — large size, single-position exposure, or thin win-rate sample.
- Trades (all time)
- 48
- Avg trade size
- $26.76
- Top category
- —
- Category concentration
- 0%
- First seen
- Jul 16, 15:16 UTC
- Last active
- Jul 21, 10:40 UTC
- Win rate sample
- 9 closed
The single Activity score is kept for the leaderboard sort. The five dimensions above are the canonical read; copy-risk is inverted so green means lower risk of over-reading the wallet.