Musty-Lox
0xecd3c5e60ddb68e10bbdcf696d9c8f59d47af6e9
Wallet digest
Activity score
79/100
Performance: thin sample
Open positions
8
Open notional
$220.22
Total PnL
$-35.04
Realised
$0.00
Win rate
n/a
too few closed
Largest open positions
- NO
Will Silver (SI) hit (HIGH) $110 by end of March?
220 shares @ 99.7¢·now 100.0¢·exp Mar 31, 2026$220.22
$0.66
- YES
Will Elon Musk post 180-199 tweets from March 20 to March 27, 2026?
520 shares @ 0.4¢·now 0.0¢·exp Mar 27, 2026$0.00
$-2.08
- YES
Will the price of XRP be less than $1.80 on November 14?
510 shares @ 1.4¢·now 0.0¢·exp Nov 14, 2025$0.00
$-7.14
- YES
Will Al Ain beat Manchester City?
490 shares @ 3.8¢·now 0.0¢·exp Jun 23, 2025$0.00
$-18.62
- YES
Will Crude Oil (CL) hit (HIGH) $180 by end of March?
390 shares @ 0.4¢·now 0.0¢·exp Mar 31, 2026$0.00
$-1.56
- YES
Will OpenAI have the top AI model on October 31?
354 shares @ 0.6¢·now 0.0¢·exp Oct 31, 2025$0.00
$-2.30
- YES
Will the price of XRP be between $3.10 and $3.20 on October 16?
280 shares @ 0.8¢·now 0.0¢·exp Oct 16, 2025$0.00
$-2.24
- YES
Will 'Opalite' be the most streamed song on 'The Life of a Showgirl' on Oct 10th?
220 shares @ 0.8¢·now 0.0¢·exp Oct 10, 2025$0.00
$-1.76
Recent activity
- TRADEBUYWill Silver (SI) hit (HIGH) $110 by end of March?$219.56Mar 27, 21:08 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Crude Oil (CL) hit (HIGH) $180 by end of March?$1.56Mar 25, 08:03 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Elon Musk post 180-199 tweets from March 20 to March 27, 2026?$2.08Mar 22, 12:03 UTC
- REDEEMWill Elon Musk post 500-519 tweets from March 10 to March 17, 2026?$330.00Mar 19, 19:18 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Elon Musk post 500-519 tweets from March 10 to March 17, 2026?$329.01Mar 14, 10:10 UTC
- REDEEMWill OpenAI have the top AI model on September 30?$150.00Nov 13, 17:53 UTC
- REDEEMWill the price of Ethereum be between $3800 and $3900 on August 4?$260.04Nov 13, 17:53 UTC
- REDEEMIsrael x Hamas ceasefire by Friday?$320.00Nov 13, 17:53 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill the price of XRP be less than $1.80 on November 14?$7.14Nov 9, 12:02 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill OpenAI have the top AI model on October 31?$2.30Oct 30, 20:03 UTC
- TRADESELLWill the Jets win the AFC Championship?$69.65Oct 29, 16:46 UTC
- TRADESELLWill the Dolphins win the AFC Championship?$99.60Oct 29, 10:36 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill the Dolphins win the AFC Championship?$9.35Oct 25, 02:35 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill the Dolphins win the AFC Championship?$7.97Oct 25, 02:32 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill the Dolphins win the AFC Championship?$9.96Oct 25, 02:26 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill the Dolphins win the AFC Championship?$12.95Oct 25, 00:10 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill the Dolphins win the AFC Championship?$8.96Oct 24, 23:40 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill the Dolphins win the AFC Championship?$10.96Oct 24, 22:58 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill the Dolphins win the AFC Championship?$6.97Oct 24, 21:27 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill the Dolphins win the AFC Championship?$11.95Oct 24, 21:25 UTC
Persistent ledger timeline
persistentNo trades for this wallet in Orrery's persistent ledger yet. The whale-ingest cron writes ≥ $5k trades every 10 minutes; check back after a recovery window.
Ledger intelligence
persistent7d volume
$0.00
0 trades
30d volume
$0.00
0 trades
Buy share
50%
Sample
low
0 ledger trades
No persistent whale trades for this wallet yet. The live Data API score above can still be useful, but the durable ledger sample is empty.
Profile dimensions
Trade count + how recently they were active. Low = dormant.
How trustworthy the win-rate number is, based on sample size of closed markets.
Share of trades concentrated in their top category.
Share of positions taken while the market was still uncertain (30–70¢) rather than after direction was obvious.
How risky to blindly copy. Higher = riskier — large size, single-position exposure, or thin win-rate sample.
- Trades (all time)
- 44
- Avg trade size
- $293.03
- Top category
- —
- Category concentration
- 0%
- First seen
- May 8, 02:29 UTC
- Last active
- Mar 27, 21:08 UTC
- Win rate sample
- 0 closed
The single Activity score is kept for the leaderboard sort. The five dimensions above are the canonical read — copy-risk bar is inverted so green is always "better for the user".