Elderly-Prompt
0xed33b4624a668bc06e90d295cf2aca23cab0cdc9
Wallet digest
Activity score
45/100
Performance: thin sample
Open positions
1
Open notional
$0.00
Total PnL
$-416.00
Realised
$0.00
Win rate
n/a
too few closed
Largest open positions
Recent activity
- TRADEBUYWarriors vs. Grizzlies$416.00Jul 15, 17:47 UTC
- TRADESELLHan Duck-soo in jail by August 15?$448.00Jul 15, 15:22 UTC
- TRADEBUYHan Duck-soo in jail by August 15?$413.00Jul 15, 11:09 UTC
- TRADESELLIsrael x Hamas ceasefire by August 15?$556.50Jul 15, 11:03 UTC
- TRADEBUYIsrael x Hamas ceasefire by August 15?$577.50Jul 15, 07:42 UTC
- TRADESELLMeta releases Llama 5 in 2025?$578.00Jul 15, 07:37 UTC
- TRADEBUYMeta releases Llama 5 in 2025?$586.50Jul 14, 11:34 UTC
- TRADESELLAnother GTA VI trailer released in 2025?$551.20Jul 14, 11:29 UTC
- TRADEBUYAnother GTA VI trailer released in 2025?$561.80Jul 13, 07:49 UTC
Persistent ledger timeline
persistentNo trades for this wallet in Orrery's persistent ledger yet. The whale-ingest cron writes ≥ $5k trades every 10 minutes; check back after a recovery window.
Ledger intelligence
persistent7d volume
$0.00
0 trades
30d volume
$0.00
0 trades
Buy share
50%
Sample
low
0 ledger trades
No persistent whale trades for this wallet yet. The live Data API score above can still be useful, but the durable ledger sample is empty.
Profile dimensions
Trade count + how recently they were active. Low = dormant.
How trustworthy the win-rate number is, based on sample size of closed markets.
Share of trades concentrated in their top category.
Share of positions taken while the market was still uncertain (30–70¢) rather than after direction was obvious.
How risky to blindly copy. Higher = riskier — large size, single-position exposure, or thin win-rate sample.
- Trades (all time)
- 9
- Avg trade size
- $520.94
- Top category
- —
- Category concentration
- 0%
- First seen
- Jul 13, 07:49 UTC
- Last active
- Jul 15, 17:47 UTC
- Win rate sample
- 0 closed
The single Activity score is kept for the leaderboard sort. The five dimensions above are the canonical read — copy-risk bar is inverted so green is always "better for the user".