Wide-Buddy
0xed42ff70b4d4c9e11b32553ea20bde5384c3c0ef
Wallet digest
Activity score
43/100
Performance: thin sample
Open positions
1
Open notional
$0.00
Total PnL
$-1.1K
Realised
$0.00
Win rate
n/a
too few closed
Largest open positions
Recent activity
- TRADEBUYSolana all time high in Q4?$93.82Oct 11, 00:20 UTC
- TRADEBUYSolana all time high in Q4?$440.00Oct 11, 00:05 UTC
- TRADEBUYSolana all time high in Q4?$589.60Oct 10, 23:59 UTC
- REDEEMSolana all time high in Q3?$1.1KOct 10, 23:59 UTC
- TRADEBUYSolana all time high in Q3?$1.1KSep 4, 06:32 UTC
- REDEEMWill Kamala Harris drop out in August?$1.1KSep 2, 08:26 UTC
- REDEEMEthereum above $3,000 on August 9?$5.07Aug 12, 01:11 UTC
- TRADEBUYWill Kamala Harris drop out in August?$1.1KAug 7, 05:05 UTC
- TRADEBUYEthereum above $3,000 on August 9?$5.00Aug 7, 01:16 UTC
Persistent ledger timeline
persistentNo trades for this wallet in Orrery's persistent ledger yet. The whale-ingest cron writes ≥ $5k trades every 10 minutes; check back after a recovery window.
Ledger intelligence
persistent7d volume
$0.00
0 trades
30d volume
$0.00
0 trades
Buy share
50%
Sample
low
0 ledger trades
No persistent whale trades for this wallet yet. The live Data API score above can still be useful, but the durable ledger sample is empty.
Profile dimensions
Trade count + how recently they were active. Low = dormant.
How trustworthy the win-rate number is, based on sample size of closed markets.
Share of trades concentrated in their top category.
Share of positions taken while the market was still uncertain (30–70¢) rather than after direction was obvious.
How risky to blindly copy. Higher = riskier — large size, single-position exposure, or thin win-rate sample.
- Trades (all time)
- 6
- Avg trade size
- $553.51
- Top category
- —
- Category concentration
- 0%
- First seen
- Aug 7, 01:16 UTC
- Last active
- Oct 11, 00:20 UTC
- Win rate sample
- 0 closed
The single Activity score is kept for the leaderboard sort. The five dimensions above are the canonical read — copy-risk bar is inverted so green is always "better for the user".