Worn-Decline
0xee4ee2273ad7e138d9b1afcada29ca1b60e78b49
Wallet digest
Activity score
75/100
Performance measurable
Open positions
56
Open notional
$8.02
Total PnL
$-51.27
Realised
$35.29
Win rate
88%
41 closed
Largest open positions
showing 10 of 56- NO
Will the US confirm that aliens exist in 2024?
8 shares @ 97.3¢·now 100.0¢·exp Dec 31, 2024$8.02
$0.22
- YES
Will Brandon Aiyuk be the top Fantasy Wide Receiver?
1200 shares @ 0.4¢·now 0.0¢·exp Jan 6, 2025$0.00
$-5.07
- YES
Will Red Bull Salzburg win the UEFA Champions League?
1000 shares @ 0.3¢·now 0.0¢·exp Jan 1, 1970$0.00
$-3.00
- YES
Will Travis Etienne Jr. be the top Fantasy Running Back?
1000 shares @ 0.6¢·now 0.0¢·exp Jan 7, 2025$0.00
$-5.99
- YES
Will Young Boys win the UEFA Champions League?
1000 shares @ 0.2¢·now 0.0¢·exp May 31, 2025$0.00
$-2.50
- YES
Will Dinamo Zagreb win the UEFA Champions League?
1000 shares @ 0.3¢·now 0.0¢·exp May 31, 2025$0.00
$-3.50
- YES
Will Celtic win the UEFA Champions League?
1000 shares @ 0.3¢·now 0.0¢·exp May 31, 2025$0.00
$-3.00
- YES
Will Shakhtar Donetsk win the UEFA Champions League?
1000 shares @ 0.3¢·now 0.0¢·exp May 31, 2025$0.00
$-3.50
- YES
Will Michael Pittman Jr. be the top Fantasy Wide Receiver?
1000 shares @ 0.3¢·now 0.0¢·exp Jan 6, 2025$0.00
$-2.94
- YES
Will Isiah Pacheco be the top Fantasy Running Back?
1000 shares @ 0.3¢·now 0.0¢·exp Jan 7, 2025$0.00
$-3.07
Recent activity
- TRADEBUYNottingham Forest wins the Premier League?$0.03Apr 7, 16:35 UTC
- TRADEBUYNottingham Forest wins the Premier League?$0.00Apr 7, 16:35 UTC
- TRADEBUYNottingham Forest wins the Premier League?$0.00Apr 7, 16:35 UTC
- TRADEBUYNottingham Forest wins the Premier League?$0.00Apr 7, 16:35 UTC
- TRADEBUYNottingham Forest wins the Premier League?$0.00Apr 7, 16:34 UTC
- TRADEBUYNottingham Forest wins the Premier League?$0.05Apr 7, 16:34 UTC
- TRADEBUYNottingham Forest wins the Premier League?$0.00Apr 7, 16:34 UTC
- TRADEBUYNottingham Forest wins the Premier League?$0.05Apr 7, 16:34 UTC
- TRADEBUYNottingham Forest wins the Premier League?$0.00Apr 7, 16:34 UTC
- TRADEBUYNottingham Forest wins the Premier League?$0.00Apr 7, 16:34 UTC
- TRADEBUYNottingham Forest wins the Premier League?$0.00Apr 7, 16:34 UTC
- TRADEBUYNottingham Forest wins the Premier League?$0.05Apr 7, 16:34 UTC
- TRADEBUYNottingham Forest wins the Premier League?$0.00Apr 7, 16:34 UTC
- TRADEBUYNottingham Forest wins the Premier League?$0.00Apr 7, 16:34 UTC
- TRADEBUYNottingham Forest wins the Premier League?$0.00Apr 7, 16:34 UTC
- TRADEBUYNottingham Forest wins the Premier League?$0.06Apr 7, 16:33 UTC
- TRADEBUYNottingham Forest wins the Premier League?$0.06Apr 7, 16:33 UTC
- TRADEBUYNottingham Forest wins the Premier League?$0.00Apr 7, 16:33 UTC
- TRADEBUYNottingham Forest wins the Premier League?$0.00Apr 7, 16:33 UTC
- TRADEBUYNottingham Forest wins the Premier League?$0.00Apr 7, 16:33 UTC
Persistent ledger timeline
persistentNo trades for this wallet in Orrery's persistent ledger yet. The whale-ingest cron writes ≥ $5k trades every 10 minutes; check back after a recovery window.
Ledger intelligence
persistent7d volume
$0.00
0 trades
30d volume
$0.00
0 trades
Buy share
50%
Sample
low
0 ledger trades
No persistent whale trades for this wallet yet. The live Data API score above can still be useful, but the durable ledger sample is empty.
Profile dimensions
Trade count + how recently they were active. Low = dormant.
How trustworthy the win-rate number is, based on sample size of closed markets.
Share of trades concentrated in their top category.
Share of positions taken while the market was still uncertain (30–70¢) rather than after direction was obvious.
How risky to blindly copy. Higher = riskier — large size, single-position exposure, or thin win-rate sample.
- Trades (all time)
- 50
- Avg trade size
- $0.09
- Top category
- —
- Category concentration
- 0%
- First seen
- Feb 7, 15:55 UTC
- Last active
- Apr 7, 16:35 UTC
- Win rate sample
- 41 closed
The single Activity score is kept for the leaderboard sort. The five dimensions above are the canonical read — copy-risk bar is inverted so green is always "better for the user".