Honorable-Wholesale
0xee9dbe91dd9d329970dedecd26dece3b5b905f41
Wallet digest
Activity score
71/100
Performance: thin sample
Open positions
107
Open notional
$131.71
Total PnL
$-421.00
Realised
$0.00
Win rate
n/a
too few closed
Largest open positions
showing 10 of 107- UNDER
Detroit Tigers vs. Chicago White Sox: O/U 7.5
26 shares @ 41.6¢·now 77.5¢·exp May 29, 2026$19.94
$9.23
- TEXAS RANGERS
Kansas City Royals vs. Texas Rangers
15 shares @ 53.0¢·now 99.8¢·exp Jun 6, 2026$15.16
$7.11
- UNDER
Detroit Tigers vs. Chicago White Sox: O/U 8.5
10 shares @ 50.0¢·now 84.0¢·exp May 29, 2026$8.74
$3.54
- OVER
New York Yankees vs. Athletics: O/U 13.5
15 shares @ 22.0¢·now 48.5¢·exp May 30, 2026$7.11
$3.88
- OVER
Kansas City Royals vs. Texas Rangers: O/U 8.5
9 shares @ 40.5¢·now 69.0¢·exp May 30, 2026$6.52
$2.69
- DETROIT TIGERS
Detroit Tigers vs. Chicago White Sox
13 shares @ 48.0¢·now 46.5¢·exp Jun 5, 2026$6.26
$-0.20
- LOS ANGELES SPARKS
Los Angeles Sparks vs. Washington Mystics
5 shares @ 40.0¢·now 100.0¢·exp May 29, 2026$5.34
$3.20
- OVER
San Francisco Giants vs. Colorado Rockies: O/U 8.5
7 shares @ 53.0¢·now 69.0¢·exp May 30, 2026$4.91
$1.14
- UNDER
Milwaukee Brewers vs. Houston Astros: O/U 7.5
17 shares @ 47.0¢·now 26.5¢·exp May 30, 2026$4.50
$-3.48
- UNDER
Detroit Tigers vs. Chicago White Sox: O/U 5.5
9 shares @ 25.0¢·now 47.0¢·exp May 29, 2026$4.15
$1.94
Recent activity
- REDEEMChicago Cubs vs. St. Louis Cardinals$9.78May 30, 02:07 UTC
- REDEEMMinnesota Twins vs. Pittsburgh Pirates$6.95May 30, 02:07 UTC
- REDEEMMinnesota Twins vs. Pittsburgh Pirates: O/U 10.5$6.05May 30, 02:05 UTC
- REDEEMMinnesota Twins vs. Pittsburgh Pirates: O/U 9.5$16.93May 30, 02:05 UTC
- REDEEMToronto Blue Jays vs. Baltimore Orioles$4.43May 30, 02:00 UTC
- REDEEMMinnesota Lynx vs. Chicago Sky: O/U 171.5$17.80May 30, 01:59 UTC
- REDEEMMinnesota Lynx vs. Chicago Sky: O/U 170.5$13.57May 30, 01:59 UTC
- TRADEBUYNew York Yankees vs. Athletics: O/U 12.5$3.25May 30, 01:52 UTC
- TRADEBUYNew York Yankees vs. Athletics: O/U 8.5$5.22May 30, 01:44 UTC
- REDEEMBoston Red Sox vs. Cleveland Guardians: O/U 7.5$12.46May 30, 01:43 UTC
- REDEEMBoston Red Sox vs. Cleveland Guardians: O/U 9.5$2.73May 30, 01:43 UTC
- REDEEMBoston Red Sox vs. Cleveland Guardians$14.01May 30, 01:43 UTC
- TRADEBUYNew York Yankees vs. Athletics$2.48May 30, 01:43 UTC
- TRADEBUYNew York Yankees vs. Athletics: O/U 9.5$2.80May 30, 01:43 UTC
- TRADEBUYNew York Yankees vs. Athletics: O/U 9.5$1.23May 30, 01:42 UTC
- REDEEMLos Angeles Angels vs. Tampa Bay Rays: O/U 11.5$16.00May 30, 01:40 UTC
- REDEEMSan Diego Padres vs. Washington Nationals: O/U 10.5$23.88May 30, 01:29 UTC
- REDEEMLos Angeles Angels vs. Tampa Bay Rays: O/U 9.5$6.68May 30, 01:27 UTC
- REDEEMLos Angeles Angels vs. Tampa Bay Rays: O/U 8.5$7.24May 30, 01:27 UTC
- TRADEBUYSan Francisco Giants vs. Colorado Rockies$2.12May 30, 01:24 UTC
Persistent ledger timeline
persistentNo trades for this wallet in Orrery's persistent ledger yet. The whale-ingest cron writes ≥ $5k trades every 10 minutes; check back after a recovery window.
Ledger intelligence
persistent7d volume
$0.00
0 trades
30d volume
$0.00
0 trades
Buy share
50%
Sample
low
0 ledger trades
No persistent whale trades for this wallet yet. The live Data API score above can still be useful, but the durable ledger sample is empty.
Profile dimensions
Trade count + how recently they were active. Low = dormant.
How trustworthy the win-rate number is, based on sample size of closed markets.
Share of trades concentrated in their top category.
Share of positions taken while the market was still uncertain (30–70¢) rather than after direction was obvious.
How risky to blindly copy. Higher = riskier — large size, single-position exposure, or thin win-rate sample.
- Trades (all time)
- 34
- Avg trade size
- $2.74
- Top category
- —
- Category concentration
- 0%
- First seen
- May 29, 23:46 UTC
- Last active
- May 30, 02:07 UTC
- Win rate sample
- 0 closed
The single Activity score is kept for the leaderboard sort. The five dimensions above are the canonical read — copy-risk bar is inverted so green is always "better for the user".