Imperturbable-Memorial
0xef1ac5a0517c5d5c9b9983d213b0268d0d612f3b
Activity score
75/100
Performance: thin sample
Open positions
15
Open notional
$287.00
Total PnL
$-513.75
Realised
$0.00
Win rate
n/a
too few closed
Largest open positions
showing 10 of 15- LIANG
WTT - Men's Singles: Sora Matsushima vs Jingkun Liang
574 shares @ 3.0¢·now 50.0¢·exp May 17, 2026$287.00
$269.78
- STONEHENGE ESPORTS
LoL: StoneHenge Esports vs Aeterna Esports (BO5) - LIT Playoffs
658 shares @ 9.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Apr 22, 2026$0.00
$-59.18
- PLEASE NOT HERO BAN
Overwatch: VARREL vs Please Not Hero Ban (BO2) - OCS Asia Stage 1 Group B
288 shares @ 3.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp May 5, 2026$0.00
$-8.64
- MOUZ
Counter-Strike: MOUZ vs TheMongolz (BO3) - BLAST Open Rotterdam Group B
281 shares @ 50.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Mar 19, 2026$0.00
$-140.50
- TEAM PHOENIX
LoL: PCIFIC vs Team Phoenix (BO3) - TCL Regular Season
207 shares @ 6.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Apr 23, 2026$0.00
$-12.42
- WONG
WTT - Men's Singles: Benedikt Duda vs Chun-Ting Wong
204 shares @ 96.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp May 13, 2026$0.00
$-195.84
- GEEK FAM ID
Mobile Legends Bang Bang: EVOS vs Geek Fam ID (BO3) - MPL Indonesia Regular Season
199 shares @ 40.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Mar 28, 2026$0.00
$-79.60
- LT GAMING
Honor of Kings: SYGaming vs LT Gaming (BO5) - KPL Growth League Group Stage
166 shares @ 50.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Mar 23, 2026$0.00
$-83.00
- SHARKS
Counter-Strike: Sharks vs BIG (BO3) - CCT Global Finals Playoffs
165 shares @ 9.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Apr 25, 2026$0.00
$-14.88
- AURORA GAMING
Counter-Strike: Natus Vincere vs Aurora Gaming (BO5) - ESL Pro League Playoffs
129 shares @ 33.0¢·now 0.0¢·exp Mar 15, 2026$0.00
$-42.57
Recent activity
- TRADEBUYWTT - Men's Singles: Sora Matsushima vs Jingkun Liang$17.7219h ago
- REDEEMWTT - Men's Singles: Tomokazu Harimoto vs Yi-Hsin Feng$210.0023h ago
- TRADEBUYWTT - Men's Singles: Tomokazu Harimoto vs Yi-Hsin Feng$407.401d ago
- REDEEMWTT - Men's Singles: Brazil vs France$538.003d ago
- TRADEBUYWTT - Men's Singles: Brazil vs France$22.143d ago
- TRADEBUYWTT - Men's Singles: Benedikt Duda vs Chun-Ting Wong$7.965d ago
- TRADEBUYWTT - Men's Singles: Benedikt Duda vs Chun-Ting Wong$187.885d ago
- REDEEMOverwatch: Falcons vs Please Not Hero Ban (BO2) - OCS Asia Stage 1 Group B$209.005d ago
- TRADEBUYOverwatch: Falcons vs Please Not Hero Ban (BO2) - OCS Asia Stage 1 Group B$204.825d ago
- REDEEMLoL: Bohemian Guardians vs EXILE esports (BO3) - Hitpoint Masters Regular Season$224.006d ago
- TRADEBUYLoL: Bohemian Guardians vs EXILE esports (BO3) - Hitpoint Masters Regular Season$9.106d ago
- TRADEBUYLoL: Bohemian Guardians vs EXILE esports (BO3) - Hitpoint Masters Regular Season$194.746d ago
- TRADEBUYOverwatch: VARREL vs Please Not Hero Ban (BO2) - OCS Asia Stage 1 Group B$8.896d ago
- REDEEMInternazionali BNL d'Italia, Qualification: Beatrice Ricci vs Tamara Korpatsch$191.007d ago
- TRADEBUYInternazionali BNL d'Italia, Qualification: Beatrice Ricci vs Tamara Korpatsch$183.367d ago
- REDEEMIstanbul: Donna Vekic vs Aliona Falei$210.007d ago
- TRADEBUYIstanbul: Donna Vekic vs Aliona Falei$182.017d ago
- TRADEBUYIstanbul: Donna Vekic vs Aliona Falei$13.297d ago
- REDEEMCounter-Strike: MAJIX ESPORTS vs Younglings (BO3) - Exort Series Contenders Stage$195.008d ago
- TRADEBUYCounter-Strike: MAJIX ESPORTS vs Younglings (BO3) - Exort Series Contenders Stage$175.508d ago
Profile dimensions
Trade count + how recently they were active. Low = dormant.
How trustworthy the win-rate number is, based on sample size of closed markets.
Share of trades concentrated in their top category.
Share of positions taken while the market was still uncertain (30–70¢) rather than after direction was obvious.
How risky to blindly copy. Higher = riskier — large size, single-position exposure, or thin win-rate sample.
- Trades (all time)
- 35
- Avg trade size
- $70.71
- Top category
- —
- Category concentration
- 0%
- First seen
- 53d ago
- Last active
- 19h ago
- Win rate sample
- 0 closed
The single Activity score is kept for the leaderboard sort. The five dimensions above are the canonical read — copy-risk bar is inverted so green is always "better for the user".
